California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate 1 R cosponsors

SB 69 — In-home supportive services: program changes: implementation.

Last action — Stricken from Senate file.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law provides for the In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program, under which qualified aged, blind, and disabled persons receive services enabling them to remain in their own homes and avoid institutionalization. Existing law permits services to be provided under the IHSS program either through the employment of individual providers, a contract between the county and an entity for the provision of services, the creation by the county of a public authority, or a contract between the county and a nonprofit consortium. Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which health care services are provided to qualified low-income persons. Under existing law, IHSS recipients who are eligible for the Medi-Cal program are provided with personal care option services, as defined, in lieu of receiving these services under the IHSS program. Existing law, enacted in 2009, makes various statutory changes with respect to the provision of in-home supportive services, relating to matters, including, but not limited to, provider enrollment procedures, criminal background checks, orientation, and duties, as well as eligibility standards for recipients, unannounced home visits, and program integrity and fraud prevention. This bill would make the operation of the statutory changes described above subject to a stakeholder process, to be conducted, as specified, by the State Department of Social Services, prior to the implementation of those changes. The bill would require implementation of any of the statutory changes described in the bill to occur either on the date specified in an applicable statute, or 60 days after the department notifies the Joint Legislative Budget Committee that the changes may be implemented, whichever is later. This bill would prohibit information notices relating to the implementation of these statutory changes from being sent to recipients or providers until the stakeholder process is completed. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Stricken from Senate file.

  2. Senate refuses to concur in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 23. Noes 12. Page 2555.)

  3. Urgency clause refused adoption.

  4. In Senate. To unfinished business.

  5. Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 68. Noes 0. Page 3582.) To Senate.

  6. Read third time. Amended. (Page 3581.)

  7. From inactive file to third reading file.

  8. Notice of motion to remove from inactive file given by Assembly Member Krekorian.

  9. Placed on inactive file on request of Assembly Member Krekorian.

  10. Read second time. To third reading.

  11. Placed on second reading file.

  12. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  13. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 22. Noes 14. Page 511.) To Assembly.

  14. Read second time. To third reading.

  15. Placed on second reading file.

  16. Withdrawn from committee.

  17. To Com. on RLS.

  18. Read first time.

  19. From print. May be acted upon on or after February 20.

  20. Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Beall · Cosponsor
  • Bass · Cosponsor
  • Bradford · Cosponsor
  • Brownley · Cosponsor
  • Carter · Cosponsor
  • Chesbro · Cosponsor
  • De Leon · Cosponsor
  • John A. Perez · Cosponsor
  • V. Manuel Perez · Cosponsor
  • Portantino · Cosponsor
  • Salas · Cosponsor
  • Saldana · Cosponsor
  • Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review · Primary
  • Davis · Cosponsor
  • De La Torre · Cosponsor
  • Eng · Cosponsor
  • Evans · Cosponsor
  • Fuentes · Cosponsor
  • Galgiani · Cosponsor
  • Hill · Cosponsor
  • Huffman · Cosponsor
  • Krekorian · Cosponsor
  • Lieu · Cosponsor
  • Monning · Cosponsor
  • Nava · Cosponsor
  • Skinner · Cosponsor
  • Solorio · Cosponsor
  • Swanson · Cosponsor
  • Torres · Cosponsor
  • Torrico · Cosponsor
  • Yamada · Cosponsor
  • Brian W. Jones · Cosponsor
  • Bonnie Lowenthal · Cosponsor
  • Vince Fong · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 33 co-sponsors · 88 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review

Co-sponsors (33)

  • Beall
  • Bass
  • Bradford
  • Brownley
  • Carter
  • Chesbro
  • De Leon
  • John A. Perez
  • V. Manuel Perez
  • Portantino
  • Salas
  • Saldana
  • Davis
  • De La Torre
  • Eng
  • Evans
  • Fuentes
  • Galgiani
  • Hill
  • Huffman
  • Krekorian
  • Lieu
  • Monning
  • Nava
  • Skinner
  • Solorio
  • Swanson
  • Torres
  • Torrico
  • Yamada
  • Jones, Brian W. Republican
  • Bonnie Lowenthal
  • Vince Fong

Not signed on (88)

88 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 88 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Unfinished Business SB69 Committee on B. & F.R. (Ducheny) Urgency Clause

Failed 24 Yea · 12 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 221105
Democratic 2000
Republican 0100
Total 241205
% of votes cast 59%29%0%12%
How each member voted (41)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Cogdill — Nay
Hancock — Yea
Huff — Nay
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Ashburn — Nay
Benoit — Nay
Ducheny — Yea
Dutton — Nay
Pavley — Yea
Romero — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Runner — Not Voting
Correa — Not Voting
Harman — Not Voting
Oropeza — Not Voting
Aanestad — Not Voting
Alquist — Yea
Hollingsworth — Nay
Maldonado — Nay
Price — Yea
Wiggins — Yea
Cox — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Nay
Florez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

SB 69 B.& F. R. Third Reading Urgency By EVANS

Passed 77 Yea · 0 Nay · 14 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 720013
Democratic 3000
Republican 2001
Total 770014
% of votes cast 85%0%0%15%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Not Voting
Bill — Yea
Adams — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Beall — Yea
Eng — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuentes — Not Voting
Fuller — Yea
Charles — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huber — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
Knight — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Carter — Yea
Tom — Not Voting
De — Not Voting
Leon — Not Voting
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cook — Yea
Coto — Yea
Davis — Yea
DeVore — Yea
Krekorian — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Monning — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Silva — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Tran — Yea
Audra — Not Voting
Hernandez — Not Voting
Jeffries — Not Voting
Mendoza — Not Voting
Miller — Not Voting
Nava — Not Voting
Ammiano — Yea
Bass — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Logue — Not Voting
Ma — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Villines — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Gilmore — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Senate 3rd Reading SB69 Committee on B. & F.R. (Ducheny)

Passed 23 Yea · 14 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 211302
Democratic 2001
Republican 0100
Total 231403
% of votes cast 58%35%0%8%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Cedillo — Not Voting
Cogdill — Nay
Negrete — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Hollingsworth — Nay
Huff — Nay
Runner — Nay
Ducheny — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Ashburn — Nay
Benoit — Nay
Dutton — Nay
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wiggins — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Aanestad — Nay
Harman — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Maldonado — Not Voting
Oropeza — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Romero — Yea
Walters — Nay
Correa — Yea
Cox — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Nay
Florez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety healthcare labor
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 69 do?
Existing law provides for the In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program, under which qualified aged, blind, and disabled persons receive services enabling them to remain in their own homes and avoid institutionalization. Existing law permits services to be provided under the IHSS program either through the employment of individual providers, a contract between the county and an entity for the provision of services, the creation by the county of a public authority, or a contract between the county and a nonprofit consortium. Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which health care services are provided to qualified low-income persons. Under existing law, IHSS recipients who are eligible for the Medi-Cal program are provided with personal care option services, as defined, in lieu of receiving these services under the IHSS program. Existing law, enacted in 2009, makes various statutory changes with respect to the provision of in-home supportive services, relating to matters, including, but not limited to, provider enrollment procedures, criminal background checks, orientation, and duties, as well as eligibility standards for recipients, unannounced home visits, and program integrity and fraud prevention. This bill would make the operation of the statutory changes described above subject to a stakeholder process, to be conducted, as specified, by the State Department of Social Services, prior to the implementation of those changes. The bill would require implementation of any of the statutory changes described in the bill to occur either on the date specified in an applicable statute, or 60 days after the department notifies the Joint Legislative Budget Committee that the changes may be implemented, whichever is later. This bill would prohibit information notices relating to the implementation of these statutory changes from being sent to recipients or providers until the stakeholder process is completed. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Who sponsors SB 69?
SB 69 is sponsored by Beall, Bass, Bradford, Brownley, Carter, Chesbro, De Leon, John A. Perez, V. Manuel Perez, Portantino, Salas, Saldana, Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review, Davis, De La Torre, Eng, Evans, Fuentes, Galgiani, Hill, Huffman, Krekorian, Lieu, Monning, Nava, Skinner, Solorio, Swanson, Torres, Torrico, Yamada, Jones, Brian W. (Republican), Bonnie Lowenthal, and Vince Fong.
What is the current status of SB 69?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 69?
Track SB 69 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 69

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 69

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →