AB 1592 — State employees: memorandum of understanding.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 163, Statutes of 2010.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 04, 2010. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
3 sponsors
1 primary, 2 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 8 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) Existing law provides that if any provision of a memorandum of understanding reached between the state employer and a recognized employee organization representing state civil service employees requires the expenditure of funds, those provisions of the memorandum of understanding shall not become effective unless approved by the Legislature in the annual Budget Act. This bill would approve provisions that require the expenditure of funds for memoranda of understanding entered into between the state employer and State Bargaining Units 8, 16, and 19 and would provide that the provisions of any memorandum of understanding that require the expenditure of funds shall become effective even if the provisions of the memorandum of understanding are approved by the Legislature in legislation other than the annual Budget Act. The bill would provide that provisions of the memoranda of understanding approved by this bill that require the expenditure of funds will not take effect unless funds for these provisions are specifically appropriated by the Legislature, and would authorize the state employer and the affected employee organizations to reopen negotiations on all or part of the memorandum of understanding if the memorandum of understanding that requires the expenditure of funds is not approved by the Legislature. This bill would, with respect to salaries that are continuously appropriated prior to the enactment of the annual Budget Act, require the Director of Finance to reduce the necessary items for the payment of salaries from specified funds scheduled in that Budget Act to reflect the salaries paid prior to the enactment of the annual Budget Act. (2) Existing law establishes an alternate retirement program and provides that state employees, as defined, who become new members of the Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS) during their first 24 months of employment, do not make contributions to the system or receive service credit for their service, and the state employer shall not make contributions on their behalf. These members are instead required to contribute either 5% or 6% of their monthly compensation, as specified, to the alternate retirement program, administered by the Department of Personnel Administration, and these contributions cease when the state employees begin making their own contributions to PERS. This bill would require all state employees participating in the alternate retirement system to contribute an amount equal to the same amount that employees in the same employment classifications in the same state bargaining units are required to contribute to PERS. (3) The Public Employees' Retirement Law (PERL) provides a comprehensive set of rights and benefits based upon age, service credit, and final compensation. Existing law defines final compensation variously for different member classifications and bargaining units and, in this regard, defines final compensation for a state member for the purpose of calculating retirement benefits as the highest annual average compensation earnable by the member during a designated 12-month or 36-month period, depending upon the bargaining unit and classification of that employee. Currently the final compensation for members hired on or after July 1, 2006, who are represented by State Bargaining Units 12, 16, 18, and 19, means the final compensation earnable by the member during a designated 36-month period. This bill would provide that final compensation for a person who becomes a state member, as specified, on or after October 31, 2010, and who is represented by State Bargaining Units 5 and 8, means the highest annual average compensation earnable by the member during a designated 36-month period. (4) PERL provides that the contribution rate for state miscellaneous members and specified state safety members is 5% or 6% of the compensation in excess of $513. Existing law provides that the contribution rate for specified state firefighters is 8% of compensation in excess of $238 per month. Existing law provides that the contribution rate for specified state safety patrol members is 8% of the compensation in excess of $863 per month. This bill would increase the contributions rates by 5% for state miscellaneous members of State Bargaining Units 5, 8, 12, 16, 18, and 19 and state safety members of State Bargaining Units 12, 16, 18, and 19, and by 2% for state firefighter members of State Bargaining Unit 8 and state patrol members of State Bargaining Unit 5. By increasing member contributions into a continuously appropriated fund, this bill would make an appropriation. (5) PERL establishes various retirement formulas that apply to specified membership categories. Under PERL, state miscellaneous members are generally subject to a retirement formula commonly known as 2% at 55, which, if the member retires at 55 years of age, yields a benefit equal to 2% of the member's final compensation multiplied by the member's years of service credit, as specified. Under PERL, patrol members and specified state peace officer/firefighter members are generally subject to a 3% at 50 retirement formula. Under PERL, state safety members are generally subject to a 2.5% at 55 retirement formula. This bill would provide that state miscellaneous members who are first employed on and after the date the act takes effect, are subject to a 2% at 60 retirement formula. The bill would also provide that patrol members and firefighter members in State Bargaining Units 5 and 8 who are first employed on and after October 31, 2010, are subject to a 3% at 55 retirement formula. (6) The annual Budget Act appropriates specified amounts from the General Fund, unallocated special funds, and unallocated nongovernmental cost funds, for state employee compensation. This bill would, in the event that the annual Budget Act is not enacted prior to July 1 of each year covered by the memoranda of understanding for State Bargaining Units 5, 8, 12, 16, 18, and 19, provide for a continuous appropriation for the amount necessary for the payment of compensation and benefits to members of those bargaining units. (7) This bill would provide that its provisions would not become operative unless SB 846 of the 2009–10 Regular Session is enacted and takes effect on or before January 1, 2011. (8) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 08/23/10 - Chaptered Current pdf August 23, 2010
- Enrolled 08/19/10 - Enrolled pdf August 19, 2010
- Amended 08/04/10 - Amended Senate pdf August 04, 2010
- Amended 08/02/10 - Amended Senate pdf August 02, 2010
- Introduced 01/04/10 - Introduced pdf January 04, 2010
- AB1592 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 163, Statutes of 2010.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and to the Governor at 5:20 p.m.
-
Urgency clause adopted. Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 73. Noes 4. Page 6374.)
-
Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Page 6374.)
-
From committee: With recommendation: That Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (August 19).
-
Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Page 6339.)
-
Re-referred to Com. on P.E.,R. & S.S. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 20 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed and to Assembly. (Ayes 31. Noes 1. Page 4588.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (August 9).
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (August 3).
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on P.E. & R.
-
Referred to Com. on P.E. & R.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 49. Noes 24. Page 5507.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (May 28).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (April 7).
-
Referred to Com. on P.E.,R. & S.S.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee February 4.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Buchanan · Primary
- Huber · Cosponsor
- Nava · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 119 not signed on · 3 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Buchanan
Co-sponsors (2)
- Huber
- Nava
Not signed on (119)
119 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 119 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 79 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 85 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 93% | 4% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Not Voting |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Not Voting |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 83% | 17% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 29 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 32 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 82% | 3% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Cogdill | — | Not Voting |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Not Voting |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Not Voting |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 0% | 0% | 27% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Not Voting |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 54 | 24 | 0 | 7 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 58 | 25 | 0 | 8 |
| % of votes cast | 64% | 27% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Not Voting |
| Bill | — | Nay |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Tom | — | Not Voting |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Audra | — | Not Voting |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Gilmore | — | Nay |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Blakeslee | — | Not Voting |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Not Voting |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Nay |
| Adams | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Not Voting |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Nay |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Nay |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 72% | 0% | 0% | 28% |
How each member voted (18)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Not Voting |
| Harkey | — | Not Voting |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Not Voting |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Not Voting |
| Norby | — | Not Voting |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 17% | 0% | 17% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Not Voting |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1592 do?
- (1) Existing law provides that if any provision of a memorandum of understanding reached between the state employer and a recognized employee organization representing state civil service employees requires the expenditure of funds, those provisions of the memorandum of understanding shall not become effective unless approved by the Legislature in the annual Budget Act. This bill would approve provisions that require the expenditure of funds for memoranda of understanding entered into between the state employer and State Bargaining Units 8, 16, and 19 and would provide that the provisions of any memorandum of understanding that require the expenditure of funds shall become effective even if the provisions of the memorandum of understanding are approved by the Legislature in legislation other than the annual Budget Act. The bill would provide that provisions of the memoranda of understanding approved by this bill that require the expenditure of funds will not take effect unless funds for these provisions are specifically appropriated by the Legislature, and would authorize the state employer and the affected employee organizations to reopen negotiations on all or part of the memorandum of understanding if the memorandum of understanding that requires the expenditure of funds is not approved by the Legislature. This bill would, with respect to salaries that are continuously appropriated prior to the enactment of the annual Budget Act, require the Director of Finance to reduce the necessary items for the payment of salaries from specified funds scheduled in that Budget Act to reflect the salaries paid prior to the enactment of the annual Budget Act. (2) Existing law establishes an alternate retirement program and provides that state employees, as defined, who become new members of the Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS) during their first 24 months of employment, do not make contributions to the system or receive service credit for their service, and the state employer shall not make contributions on their behalf. These members are instead required to contribute either 5% or 6% of their monthly compensation, as specified, to the alternate retirement program, administered by the Department of Personnel Administration, and these contributions cease when the state employees begin making their own contributions to PERS. This bill would require all state employees participating in the alternate retirement system to contribute an amount equal to the same amount that employees in the same employment classifications in the same state bargaining units are required to contribute to PERS. (3) The Public Employees' Retirement Law (PERL) provides a comprehensive set of rights and benefits based upon age, service credit, and final compensation. Existing law defines final compensation variously for different member classifications and bargaining units and, in this regard, defines final compensation for a state member for the purpose of calculating retirement benefits as the highest annual average compensation earnable by the member during a designated 12-month or 36-month period, depending upon the bargaining unit and classification of that employee. Currently the final compensation for members hired on or after July 1, 2006, who are represented by State Bargaining Units 12, 16, 18, and 19, means the final compensation earnable by the member during a designated 36-month period. This bill would provide that final compensation for a person who becomes a state member, as specified, on or after October 31, 2010, and who is represented by State Bargaining Units 5 and 8, means the highest annual average compensation earnable by the member during a designated 36-month period. (4) PERL provides that the contribution rate for state miscellaneous members and specified state safety members is 5% or 6% of the compensation in excess of $513. Existing law provides that the contribution rate for specified state firefighters is 8% of compensation in excess of $238 per month. Existing law provides that the contribution rate for specified state safety patrol members is 8% of the compensation in excess of $863 per month. This bill would increase the contributions rates by 5% for state miscellaneous members of State Bargaining Units 5, 8, 12, 16, 18, and 19 and state safety members of State Bargaining Units 12, 16, 18, and 19, and by 2% for state firefighter members of State Bargaining Unit 8 and state patrol members of State Bargaining Unit 5. By increasing member contributions into a continuously appropriated fund, this bill would make an appropriation. (5) PERL establishes various retirement formulas that apply to specified membership categories. Under PERL, state miscellaneous members are generally subject to a retirement formula commonly known as 2% at 55, which, if the member retires at 55 years of age, yields a benefit equal to 2% of the member's final compensation multiplied by the member's years of service credit, as specified. Under PERL, patrol members and specified state peace officer/firefighter members are generally subject to a 3% at 50 retirement formula. Under PERL, state safety members are generally subject to a 2.5% at 55 retirement formula. This bill would provide that state miscellaneous members who are first employed on and after the date the act takes effect, are subject to a 2% at 60 retirement formula. The bill would also provide that patrol members and firefighter members in State Bargaining Units 5 and 8 who are first employed on and after October 31, 2010, are subject to a 3% at 55 retirement formula. (6) The annual Budget Act appropriates specified amounts from the General Fund, unallocated special funds, and unallocated nongovernmental cost funds, for state employee compensation. This bill would, in the event that the annual Budget Act is not enacted prior to July 1 of each year covered by the memoranda of understanding for State Bargaining Units 5, 8, 12, 16, 18, and 19, provide for a continuous appropriation for the amount necessary for the payment of compensation and benefits to members of those bargaining units. (7) This bill would provide that its provisions would not become operative unless SB 846 of the 2009–10 Regular Session is enacted and takes effect on or before January 1, 2011. (8) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
- Who sponsors AB 1592?
- AB 1592 is sponsored by Buchanan, Huber, and Nava.
- What is the current status of AB 1592?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 04, 2010. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 1592?
- Track AB 1592 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1592
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1592
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →