Endangered species: experimental populations: Chinook salmon.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 1349 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 1349.
You're tracking SB 1349
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 1349 — Endangered species: experimental populations: Chinook salmon.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 291, Statutes of 2010.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 (FESA) directs federal agencies, in consultation with the Secretary of the Interior or the Secretary of Commerce, as appropriate, to carry out conservation programs for endangered species listed under FESA. FESA generally prohibits activities affecting these threatened and endangered species unless authorized by a permit from the United States Fish and Wildlife Service or the National Marine Fisheries Service, as appropriate. FESA provides for enhancement of survival permits to allow actions necessary for the establishment and maintenance of experimental populations designated pursuant to that act. The California Endangered Species Act (CESA) prohibits the taking of an endangered or threatened species, except as specified. The Department of Fish and Game may authorize the take of listed species if the take is incidental to an otherwise lawful activity and the impacts are minimized and fully mitigated. Existing law provides that if any person obtains from the Secretary of the Interior or the Secretary of Commerce an incidental take statement or incidental take permit pursuant to FESA that authorizes the taking of an endangered species or threatened species listed pursuant to FESA, and that is an endangered species, threatened species, or candidate species pursuant to CESA, no further authorization or approval is necessary under CESA for that person to take the endangered species, threatened species, or candidate species identified in, and in accordance with, the incidental take statement or incidental take permit, if that person notifies the Director of Fish and Game, as specified, and the director determines that the statement or permit is consistent with CESA. This bill would provide that a person who obtains a federal enhancement of survival permit that authorizes the take of spring run Chinook salmon, in order to establish or maintain an experimental population in the San Joaquin River pursuant to FESA and the federal San Joaquin River Restoration Settlement Act, requires no further authorization or approval under CESA for that person to take that species as identified in, and in accordance with, the enhancement of survival permit, if specified requirements are met. These provisions would remain in effect only until the effective date of an amendment to FESA that alters the requirements for issuing an enhancement of survival permit. The bill would authorize the incidental take of spring run Chinook salmon in the San Joaquin River that are designated as an experimental population under FESA, without the need for further authorization or approval under CESA, if specified requirements are met.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/24/10 - Chaptered Current pdf September 24, 2010
- Enrolled 08/23/10 - Enrolled pdf August 23, 2010
- Amended 06/24/10 - Amended Assembly pdf June 24, 2010
- Amended 05/28/10 - Amended Senate pdf May 28, 2010
- Amended 04/13/10 - Amended Senate pdf April 13, 2010
- Introduced 02/19/10 - Introduced pdf February 19, 2010
- SB1349 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 291, Statutes of 2010.
-
Approved by Governor.
-
Enrolled. To Governor at 5 p.m.
-
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 4652.) To enrollment.
-
In Senate. To unfinished business.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 6180.) To Senate.
-
Read second time. To Consent Calendar.
-
(Heard in committee on August 4.)
-
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.)
-
(Heard in committee on June 29.)
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 4.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on W.,P. & W.
-
To Com. on W.,P. & W.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 3732.) To Assembly.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
Read third time. Amended. To second reading.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
Set for hearing April 26.
-
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 3002.)
-
Set for hearing March 23.
-
To Com. on N.R. & W.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 22.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Cogdill · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Cogdill
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 33 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 36 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Wiggins | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 84 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 90 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 99% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Not Voting |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (19)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Tom | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 34 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 37 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Not Voting |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1349 do?
- The federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 (FESA) directs federal agencies, in consultation with the Secretary of the Interior or the Secretary of Commerce, as appropriate, to carry out conservation programs for endangered species listed under FESA. FESA generally prohibits activities affecting these threatened and endangered species unless authorized by a permit from the United States Fish and Wildlife Service or the National Marine Fisheries Service, as appropriate. FESA provides for enhancement of survival permits to allow actions necessary for the establishment and maintenance of experimental populations designated pursuant to that act. The California Endangered Species Act (CESA) prohibits the taking of an endangered or threatened species, except as specified. The Department of Fish and Game may authorize the take of listed species if the take is incidental to an otherwise lawful activity and the impacts are minimized and fully mitigated. Existing law provides that if any person obtains from the Secretary of the Interior or the Secretary of Commerce an incidental take statement or incidental take permit pursuant to FESA that authorizes the taking of an endangered species or threatened species listed pursuant to FESA, and that is an endangered species, threatened species, or candidate species pursuant to CESA, no further authorization or approval is necessary under CESA for that person to take the endangered species, threatened species, or candidate species identified in, and in accordance with, the incidental take statement or incidental take permit, if that person notifies the Director of Fish and Game, as specified, and the director determines that the statement or permit is consistent with CESA. This bill would provide that a person who obtains a federal enhancement of survival permit that authorizes the take of spring run Chinook salmon, in order to establish or maintain an experimental population in the San Joaquin River pursuant to FESA and the federal San Joaquin River Restoration Settlement Act, requires no further authorization or approval under CESA for that person to take that species as identified in, and in accordance with, the enhancement of survival permit, if specified requirements are met. These provisions would remain in effect only until the effective date of an amendment to FESA that alters the requirements for issuing an enhancement of survival permit. The bill would authorize the incidental take of spring run Chinook salmon in the San Joaquin River that are designated as an experimental population under FESA, without the need for further authorization or approval under CESA, if specified requirements are met.
- Who sponsors SB 1349?
- SB 1349 is sponsored by Cogdill.
- What is the current status of SB 1349?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1349?
- Track SB 1349 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1349
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1349
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →