Continuing care retirement communities: contracts.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1044 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1044.
You're tracking AB 1044
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1044 — Continuing care retirement communities: contracts.
Last action — From Senate committee without further action.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
(1) Under existing law, the State Department of Social Services is responsible for regulating activities relating to continuing care contracts that govern care provided to an elderly resident in a continuing care retirement community for the duration of the resident's life or a term in excess of one year. This bill would transfer that responsibility, except with respect to oversight and regulation of programs and services provided directly to residents of the communities, to the Department of Insurance and would make related conforming changes. The bill would require, by not later than January 1, 2011, the Insurance Commissioner, the State Public Health Officer, and the Director of Social Services to jointly develop and adopt regulations regarding standards, staff training, policies, and procedures to ensure maximum coordination and consistency of implementation of the transfer required by the bill. (2) Existing law establishes the Continuing Care Provider Fee Fund, which is continuously appropriated to the State Department of Social Services for purposes of administering the continuing care retirement community requirements of existing law. This bill would, for purposes of administering the above provisions, create 2 accounts within the fund, the Insurance Account, which would be continuously appropriated to the Department of Insurance, and the State Department of Social Services Account, which would be continuously appropriated to the State Department of Social Services. Ninety-five percent of fees collected pursuant to the above-described provisions would be deposited into the Insurance Account and 5% into the State Department of Social Services Account. (3) Existing law requires insurers to comply with various requirements. This bill would require the Insurance Commissioner to apply certain of those requirements to continuing care retirement communities and contracts, including requirements related to the disclosure of material transactions and requirements related to provider holding company systems, as defined. The bill would additionally revise and recast other provisions applicable to continuing care retirement communities and contracts, including, among other things, requirements relating to application contents, increases in monthly care fees, dividends and distributions, reserve requirements, disclosure of beneficial ownership of a provider, and personal interests of officers of a provider. The bill would enact other related provisions.
Bill Text
- Amended 06/24/09 - Amended Senate Current pdf June 24, 2009
- Amended 05/05/09 - Amended Assembly pdf May 05, 2009
- Amended 04/23/09 - Amended Assembly pdf April 23, 2009
- Amended 04/14/09 - Amended Assembly pdf April 14, 2009
- Introduced 02/27/09 - Introduced pdf February 27, 2009
- AB1044 View text html
Action History
-
From Senate committee without further action.
-
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Referred to Coms. on HUMAN S. and B., F. & I.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 49. Noes 30. Page 1936.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 28).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 13. Noes 6.) (April 28).
-
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Re-referred. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (April 21).
-
Re-referred to Com. on AGING & L.T.C. by unanimous consent, and then be re-referred to Com. on HEALTH
-
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Coms. on HEALTH and AGING & L.T.C.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.
-
Introduced. To print.
Sponsors
- Jones · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Jones
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 54 | 31 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 58 | 33 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 63% | 36% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (92)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Nay |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Galgiani | — | Nay |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Huber | — | Nay |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Tran | — | Nay |
| Duvall | — | Nay |
| Villines | — | Nay |
| Adams | — | Nay |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Block | — | Not Voting |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Nay |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 15 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 27% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (22)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Nay |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 17 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 19 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 27% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (26)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Conway | — | Nay |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Gaines | — | Nay |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 22% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1044 do?
- (1) Under existing law, the State Department of Social Services is responsible for regulating activities relating to continuing care contracts that govern care provided to an elderly resident in a continuing care retirement community for the duration of the resident's life or a term in excess of one year. This bill would transfer that responsibility, except with respect to oversight and regulation of programs and services provided directly to residents of the communities, to the Department of Insurance and would make related conforming changes. The bill would require, by not later than January 1, 2011, the Insurance Commissioner, the State Public Health Officer, and the Director of Social Services to jointly develop and adopt regulations regarding standards, staff training, policies, and procedures to ensure maximum coordination and consistency of implementation of the transfer required by the bill. (2) Existing law establishes the Continuing Care Provider Fee Fund, which is continuously appropriated to the State Department of Social Services for purposes of administering the continuing care retirement community requirements of existing law. This bill would, for purposes of administering the above provisions, create 2 accounts within the fund, the Insurance Account, which would be continuously appropriated to the Department of Insurance, and the State Department of Social Services Account, which would be continuously appropriated to the State Department of Social Services. Ninety-five percent of fees collected pursuant to the above-described provisions would be deposited into the Insurance Account and 5% into the State Department of Social Services Account. (3) Existing law requires insurers to comply with various requirements. This bill would require the Insurance Commissioner to apply certain of those requirements to continuing care retirement communities and contracts, including requirements related to the disclosure of material transactions and requirements related to provider holding company systems, as defined. The bill would additionally revise and recast other provisions applicable to continuing care retirement communities and contracts, including, among other things, requirements relating to application contents, increases in monthly care fees, dividends and distributions, reserve requirements, disclosure of beneficial ownership of a provider, and personal interests of officers of a provider. The bill would enact other related provisions.
- Who sponsors AB 1044?
- AB 1044 is sponsored by Jones.
- What is the current status of AB 1044?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1044?
- Track AB 1044 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1044
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1044
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →