California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: To Executive

SB 65 — State finances.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 633, Statutes of 2009.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

(1) Existing law sets forth the duties and authority of the Treasurer generally in the sale of state bonds. Moneys are continuously appropriated from the General Fund in an annual amount necessary to pay all obligations, including principal, interest, fees, costs, indemnities, and all other amounts incurred by the state under or in connection with any credit enhancement or liquidity agreement entered into by the state, as specified, for bonds payable pursuant to an appropriation from the General Fund. Existing law prohibits the amount appropriated for these fees, costs, and other similar expenses from exceeding a percentage of the original principal amount of the bonds that is specified in the federal Internal Revenue Code. This bill would, until June 30, 2013, instead increase that percentage by which those expenses are calculated to 3%, thereby making an appropriation. (2) Existing law authorizes the Director of Finance to defer payments of General Fund moneys in July through September of 2009, in an amount not to exceed $750,000,000, appropriated to the University of California in the Budget Act of 2009, as specified. Existing law also authorizes the director to defer payments of General Fund moneys in July 2009, in an amount not to exceed $290,000,000, appropriated to the California State University in the Budget Act of 2009, as specified. Existing law specifies the schedule of payments for these deferred amounts. This bill would additionally authorize the director to defer payments of General Fund moneys owed in February 2010, in an amount not to exceed $250,000,000, appropriated to the University of California in the Budget Act of 2009. The bill also would authorize the director to defer payments of General Fund moneys owed in February 2010 in an amount not to exceed $250,000,000, and owed in March 2010 in an amount not to exceed $150,000,000, appropriated to the California State University in the Budget Act of 2009, as specified. The bill would specify a schedule of payments for these deferred amounts. (3) Existing law defers, until October 2009, the disbursal of payments of General Fund moneys for July 2009, in an amount not to exceed $200,000,000, appropriated to the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges for apportionments to community college districts. This bill would additionally defer, until May 2010, the disbursal of payments of General Fund moneys for March 2010, in an amount not to exceed $100,000,000, appropriated to the board for apportionments to community college districts. (4) Existing law requires state excise fuel tax revenues to be deposited in various accounts and to be allocated, in part, for various purposes, including the cost of collection and authorized refunds. Existing law requires the balance of these funds remaining after authorized deductions to be transferred to, and deposited monthly in, the Highway Users Tax Account in the Transportation Tax Fund. Existing law provides for annual and monthly apportionment by the Controller of specified revenues in the Highway Users Tax Account to cities, counties, and cities and counties for the transportation purposes authorized by Article XIX of the California Constitution. Existing law, pursuant to Chapter 23 of the Fourth Extraordinary Session of the Statutes of 2009, requires transfers of those revenues from the Highway Users Tax Account to counties or cities that would otherwise be made during certain months of 2009 to instead be deferred and made after January 1, 2010. This bill would instead provide for the apportionments for the months of July and August of 2009 to cities, counties, and cities and counties to be paid in September 2009, and apportionments for November and December of 2009 and January, February, and March of 2010 to be paid on or within 2 working days of April 28, 2010, with specified exceptions. The bill would also authorize the affected local agencies to use specified transportation bond funds and other available funds to meet certain cash obligations. (5) Existing law provides for the State Supplementary Program for the Aged, Blind and Disabled (SSP) , which requires the State Department of Social Services to contract with the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services to, on behalf of the state, make combined state and federal payments to SSP recipients to supplement Supplemental Security Income (SSI) payments made available pursuant to the federal Social Security Act. Existing law provides that the contract with the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services requires the state to pay the secretary an amount equal to expenditures made by the secretary as supplemental payments to SSP recipients less amounts payable by the federal government. This bill would, upon the order of the Director of Finance, require the Director of Social Services to defer the above-described payments to the federal government in February 2010, and March 2010, and, instead, make payments for those months after April 20, 2010, but no later than May 31, 2010. (6) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 633, Statutes of 2009.

  2. Approved by Governor.

  3. Enrolled. To Governor at 11:30 a.m.

  4. Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 2517.) To enrollment.

  5. Urgency clause adopted.

  6. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 2448.)

  7. Reconsideration granted.

  8. Motion to reconsider made by Senator Ducheny.

  9. Senate refuses to concur in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 26. Noes 1. Page 2447.)

  10. Urgency clause refused adoption.

  11. In Senate. To unfinished business.

  12. Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 64. Noes 10. Page 3338.) To Senate.

  13. Read third time. Amended. (Page 3039.) To third reading.

  14. From inactive file to third reading file.

  15. Notice of motion to remove from inactive file given by Assembly Member Krekorian.

  16. Placed on inactive file on request of Assembly Member Krekorian.

  17. Read second time. To third reading.

  18. Placed on second reading file.

  19. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  20. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 22. Noes 14. Page 510.) To Assembly.

  21. Read second time. To third reading.

  22. Placed on second reading file.

  23. Withdrawn from committee.

  24. To Com. on RLS.

  25. Read first time.

  26. From print. May be acted upon on or after February 20.

  27. Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 3 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 39 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 36002
Democratic 2000
Republican 1000
Total 39002
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (41)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Ashburn — Yea
Benoit — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Runner — Yea
Harman — Yea
Hollingsworth — Yea
Huff — Yea
Liu — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Cedillo — Not Voting
Corbett — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Correa — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Price — Yea
Romero — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wiggins — Yea
Wright — Yea
Aanestad — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Maldonado — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Cogdill — Yea
Cox — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Yea
Florez — Not Voting
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 39 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 36002
Democratic 2000
Republican 1000
Total 39002
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (41)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Ashburn — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Cogdill — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Florez — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Harman — Yea
Hollingsworth — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Liu — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Romero — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wiggins — Yea
Wright — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Runner — Yea
Negrete — Not Voting
McLeod — Not Voting
Aanestad — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Benoit — Yea
Huff — Yea
Leno — Yea
Maldonado — Yea
Price — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Correa — Yea
Cox — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Failed 27 Yea · 1 Nay · 13 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 251012
Democratic 2000
Republican 0001
Total 271013
% of votes cast 66%2%0%32%
How each member voted (41)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Cogdill — Not Voting
Wyland — Not Voting
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Harman — Not Voting
Huff — Not Voting
Leno — Yea
Runner — Not Voting
Liu — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Benoit — Not Voting
Ducheny — Yea
Dutton — Not Voting
Oropeza — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Romero — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wiggins — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Aanestad — Not Voting
Ashburn — Not Voting
Hollingsworth — Not Voting
Kehoe — Yea
Maldonado — Yea
Walters — Not Voting
Wright — Yea
Correa — Yea
Cox — Not Voting
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Nay
Florez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Passed 73 Yea · 12 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 691006
Democratic 2100
Republican 2100
Total 731206
% of votes cast 80%13%0%7%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Evans — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Charles — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huber — Yea
Huffman — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Krekorian — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cook — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Bass — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Coto — Yea
Davis — Yea
DeVore — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Nava — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Silva — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Tran — Yea
Villines — Yea
Audra — Nay
Tom — Not Voting
Gilmore — Not Voting
Hagman — Not Voting
Harkey — Nay
Adams — Not Voting
Knight — Nay
Miller — Nay
Smyth — Nay
Ammiano — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Jeffries — Not Voting
Lieu — Yea
Logue — Nay
Monning — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Bill — Nay
Emmerson — Yea
Eng — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Garrick — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 23 Yea · 14 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 211302
Democratic 2001
Republican 0100
Total 231403
% of votes cast 58%35%0%8%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Cedillo — Not Voting
Florez — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Cogdill — Nay
Corbett — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Harman — Nay
Hollingsworth — Nay
Runner — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Dutton — Nay
Leno — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Ashburn — Nay
Benoit — Nay
Pavley — Yea
Romero — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wiggins — Yea
Wright — Yea
Aanestad — Nay
Huff — Nay
Liu — Yea
Maldonado — Not Voting
Oropeza — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Correa — Yea
Cox — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 65 do?
(1) Existing law sets forth the duties and authority of the Treasurer generally in the sale of state bonds. Moneys are continuously appropriated from the General Fund in an annual amount necessary to pay all obligations, including principal, interest, fees, costs, indemnities, and all other amounts incurred by the state under or in connection with any credit enhancement or liquidity agreement entered into by the state, as specified, for bonds payable pursuant to an appropriation from the General Fund. Existing law prohibits the amount appropriated for these fees, costs, and other similar expenses from exceeding a percentage of the original principal amount of the bonds that is specified in the federal Internal Revenue Code. This bill would, until June 30, 2013, instead increase that percentage by which those expenses are calculated to 3%, thereby making an appropriation. (2) Existing law authorizes the Director of Finance to defer payments of General Fund moneys in July through September of 2009, in an amount not to exceed $750,000,000, appropriated to the University of California in the Budget Act of 2009, as specified. Existing law also authorizes the director to defer payments of General Fund moneys in July 2009, in an amount not to exceed $290,000,000, appropriated to the California State University in the Budget Act of 2009, as specified. Existing law specifies the schedule of payments for these deferred amounts. This bill would additionally authorize the director to defer payments of General Fund moneys owed in February 2010, in an amount not to exceed $250,000,000, appropriated to the University of California in the Budget Act of 2009. The bill also would authorize the director to defer payments of General Fund moneys owed in February 2010 in an amount not to exceed $250,000,000, and owed in March 2010 in an amount not to exceed $150,000,000, appropriated to the California State University in the Budget Act of 2009, as specified. The bill would specify a schedule of payments for these deferred amounts. (3) Existing law defers, until October 2009, the disbursal of payments of General Fund moneys for July 2009, in an amount not to exceed $200,000,000, appropriated to the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges for apportionments to community college districts. This bill would additionally defer, until May 2010, the disbursal of payments of General Fund moneys for March 2010, in an amount not to exceed $100,000,000, appropriated to the board for apportionments to community college districts. (4) Existing law requires state excise fuel tax revenues to be deposited in various accounts and to be allocated, in part, for various purposes, including the cost of collection and authorized refunds. Existing law requires the balance of these funds remaining after authorized deductions to be transferred to, and deposited monthly in, the Highway Users Tax Account in the Transportation Tax Fund. Existing law provides for annual and monthly apportionment by the Controller of specified revenues in the Highway Users Tax Account to cities, counties, and cities and counties for the transportation purposes authorized by Article XIX of the California Constitution. Existing law, pursuant to Chapter 23 of the Fourth Extraordinary Session of the Statutes of 2009, requires transfers of those revenues from the Highway Users Tax Account to counties or cities that would otherwise be made during certain months of 2009 to instead be deferred and made after January 1, 2010. This bill would instead provide for the apportionments for the months of July and August of 2009 to cities, counties, and cities and counties to be paid in September 2009, and apportionments for November and December of 2009 and January, February, and March of 2010 to be paid on or within 2 working days of April 28, 2010, with specified exceptions. The bill would also authorize the affected local agencies to use specified transportation bond funds and other available funds to meet certain cash obligations. (5) Existing law provides for the State Supplementary Program for the Aged, Blind and Disabled (SSP) , which requires the State Department of Social Services to contract with the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services to, on behalf of the state, make combined state and federal payments to SSP recipients to supplement Supplemental Security Income (SSI) payments made available pursuant to the federal Social Security Act. Existing law provides that the contract with the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services requires the state to pay the secretary an amount equal to expenditures made by the secretary as supplemental payments to SSP recipients less amounts payable by the federal government. This bill would, upon the order of the Director of Finance, require the Director of Social Services to defer the above-described payments to the federal government in February 2010, and March 2010, and, instead, make payments for those months after April 20, 2010, but no later than May 31, 2010. (6) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Who sponsors SB 65?
SB 65 is sponsored by Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review.
What is the current status of SB 65?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 65?
Track SB 65 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 65

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 65

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →