California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 1540 — Health.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 298, Statutes of 2009.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 04, 2009. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 9 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Existing law, the California Public Records Act, requires certain public records to be made available for public inspection. Existing law, the Health Data and Advisory Council Consolidation Act, requires every organization that operates, conducts, or maintains a health facility to make and file with the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development, specified reports containing various financial and patient data. Existing law requires the office to publish risk-adjusted outcome reports for coronary artery bypass graft surgeries, as specified. This bill would provide, with respect to the above provisions, that patient medical record numbers and any other data elements that the office believes could be used to determine the identity of an individual patient shall be exempt from the disclosure requirements of the California Public Records Act. (2) Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care. Existing law provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance. The Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975 authorizes the director of the department to adopt, amend, and rescind any rules necessary to carry out the act and requires health care service plans to provide certain notices. This bill would authorize the director to, by regulation, modify the wording of any notice required by the act for purposes of clarity, readability, and accuracy. The bill would make other technical, nonsubstantive changes to related provisions governing health care service plans. (3) Existing law, known as the California Safe Drinking Water Act, requires the State Department of Public Health to administer provisions relating to the regulation of drinking water to protect public health. Existing law requires the department to adopt regulations it determines to be necessary to carry out the purposes of the California Safe Drinking Water Act. Existing law requires regulations adopted by the department to include requirements governing the use of point-of-entry treatment by public water systems in lieu of centralized treatment, as specified. This bill would require regulations adopted by the department to include requirements governing the use of point-of-entry and point-of-use treatment by public water systems in lieu of centralized treatment, as specified. The bill would also prohibit the department from issuing or amending a permit to allow the use of point-of-use treatment unless the department determines, after a public hearing, that there is no substantial community opposition. It would also limit the issuance of that permit to the lesser of 3 years or until funding for centralized treatment is available. (4) Under existing law, when a primary drinking water standard is not complied with, when a monitoring requirement is not performed, or when a water purveyor fails to comply with the conditions of a variance or exception, a public water system is required to notify the department and users, as specified. This bill would, if user notification is required pursuant to this provision, require the department to make a reasonable effort to ensure that notification is given. (5) Existing law provides that the department may issue a citation to a public water system that violates the California Safe Drinking Water Act. Existing law provides that for noncontinuing violations of primary drinking standards, other than turbidity, the department may assess a civil penalty in the citation, as specified. This bill would delete the exemption for turbidity. This bill would make other technical, nonsubstantive changes to related provisions governing the issuance of citations for violations of the California Safe Drinking Water Act. (6) Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services and under which qualified low-income persons receive health care benefits. Existing law requires that health care providers apply to, and be certified by, the department prior to their participation in the Medi-Cal program. Existing law allows the department to grant provisional provider status or preferred provisional provider status to an applicant or provider, and requires the department to terminate that status if any specified grounds exist. This bill would correct obsolete references in the above provisions. (7) Under existing law, the Medi‑Cal program is partially governed and funded as part of the federal Medicaid Program. Existing law requires the department to amend the Medicaid state plan with respect to the billing option for services by local educational agencies to ensure that schools are reimbursed for all eligible services that they provide that are not precluded by federal requirements. Existing law would repeal these provisions on January 1, 2010. This bill would change the repeal date to January 1, 2013. (8) Existing law establishes the Local Education Agency Medi‑Cal Recovery Account in the Special Deposit Fund, to be used only to support the department in meeting the requirements of the above provisions, and specifies a formula for funding and staffing activities provided for under these provisions. Existing law provides that as of January 1, 2010, unless the Legislature enacts a new statute or extends the date beyond January 1, 2010, all funds in the Local Education Agency Medi‑Cal Recovery Account shall be returned proportionately to all local education agencies whose federal Medicaid funds were used to create the account. This bill would rename the account the Local Educational Agency Medi‑Cal Recovery Fund. This bill would also provide that, as of January 1, 2013, unless the Legislature enacts a new statute or extends the repeal date, all funds in the Local Educational Agency Medi-Cal Recovery Fund shall be returned proportionally to all local educational agencies whose federal Medicaid funds were used to create the fund. (9) Existing law, until January 1, 2011, requests the University of California to establish the California Health Benefit Review Program to assess legislation proposing a mandated health benefit or service, as defined, to be provided by health care service plans and health insurers, and to prepare a written analysis in accordance with specified criteria. This bill would extend the repeal date of the above provisions to June 30, 2015. (10) Existing law requests the University of California to submit a report to the Governor and the Legislature no later than January 1, 2010, regarding the implementation of the above provisions. This bill would, instead, request the University of California to submit a report no later than January 1, 2014. (11) Existing law, for fiscal years 2006–07 to 2009–10, inclusive, provides funding for the University of California's implementation of the above provisions from a fee imposed upon health care service plans and health insurers, which would not exceed a total of $2,000,000, and is to be deposited in the Health Care Benefits Fund. This bill, instead, provides for the imposition of that fee for fiscal years 2010–11 to 2014–15, inclusive. (12) Existing law requires the State Department of Public Health to maintain a program for the control of tuberculosis. Existing law, until January 1, 2011, requires a local health department that elects to participate in the program to provide for certification for one year, by the local health officer, of tuberculin skin test technicians. This bill would delete the repeal date of these provisions, thereby extending the operation of these provisions indefinitely. (13) This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 6276.24 of the Government Code proposed by SB 359, that would become operative only if SB 359 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2010, and this bill is chaptered last. The bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 14043.28 of the Welfare and Institutions Code proposed by AB 839, that would become operative only if AB 839 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2010, and this bill is chaptered last.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 298, Statutes of 2009.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and to the Governor at 4 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 3300.)

  5. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.

  6. Read third time, passed, and to Assembly. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 2314.)

  7. Read second time. To third reading.

  8. Read third time, amended. To second reading.

  9. Read second time. To third reading.

  10. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (August 24).

  11. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  12. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  13. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  14. From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (July 13).

  15. From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on EQ. Re-referred. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (July 8).

  16. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  17. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  18. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  19. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  20. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  21. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  22. Referred to Coms. on HEALTH and EQ.

  23. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  24. Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 1856.)

  25. Read second time. To third reading.

  26. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 28).

  27. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  28. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  29. Read second time and amended.

  30. From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 28).

  31. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  32. From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on E.S. & T.M. Re-referred. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (April 21).

  33. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  34. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.

  35. Referred to Coms. on HEALTH and E.S. & T.M.

  36. From printer. May be heard in committee April 4.

  37. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Committee on Health · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Committee on Health

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 91 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 85001
Democratic 3000
Republican 3000
Total 91001
% of votes cast 99%0%0%1%
How each member voted (92)
Member Party Vote
Hagman — Yea
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Bill — Yea
Tom — Yea
Charles — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Evans — Yea
Feuer — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Audra — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Cook — Yea
Coto — Yea
Duvall — Not Voting
Garrick — Yea
Bass — Yea
Gilmore — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Krekorian — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nava — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Silva — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Tran — Yea
Adams — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Beall — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Huber — Yea
Knight — Yea
Logue — Yea
Miller — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Villines — Yea
Conway — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Eng — Yea
Davis — Yea
DeVore — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 39 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 36002
Democratic 2000
Republican 1000
Total 39002
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (41)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Cogdill — Yea
Hancock — Not Voting
Harman — Yea
Hollingsworth — Yea
Huff — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Runner — Yea
Liu — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Oropeza — Not Voting
Ashburn — Yea
Benoit — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Romero — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wiggins — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Aanestad — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Maldonado — Yea
Price — Yea
Walters — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Correa — Yea
Cox — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Yea
Florez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 13 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 13000
Total 13000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Leno — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Runner — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Price — Yea
Walters — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Cox — Yea
Denham — Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 90 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 84002
Democratic 3000
Republican 3000
Total 90002
% of votes cast 98%0%0%2%
How each member voted (92)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Yea
Tran — Yea
Charles — Yea
Evans — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Gilmore — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Audra — Yea
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Yea
Coto — Yea
Duvall — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huber — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Knight — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Logue — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nava — Yea
Price — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Silva — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Bill — Yea
Tom — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Beall — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Villines — Yea
Adams — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Bass — Not Voting
Blakeslee — Yea
Block — Not Voting
Blumenfield — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Krekorian — Yea
Ma — Yea
Miller — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Cook — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Eng — Yea
Davis — Yea
DeVore — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 22 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 20000
Democratic 1000
Republican 1000
Total 22000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (22)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Yea
Duvall — Yea
Charles — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Audra — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Krekorian — Yea
Miller — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Price — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Davis — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 24 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 21002
Republican 2000
Democratic 1000
Total 24002
% of votes cast 92%0%0%8%
How each member voted (26)
Member Party Vote
Carter — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Audra — Yea
Gaines — Not Voting
Conway — Yea
Hall — Not Voting
Hayashi — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Nava — Yea
Adams — Yea
Block — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 1540 do?
(1) Existing law, the California Public Records Act, requires certain public records to be made available for public inspection. Existing law, the Health Data and Advisory Council Consolidation Act, requires every organization that operates, conducts, or maintains a health facility to make and file with the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development, specified reports containing various financial and patient data. Existing law requires the office to publish risk-adjusted outcome reports for coronary artery bypass graft surgeries, as specified. This bill would provide, with respect to the above provisions, that patient medical record numbers and any other data elements that the office believes could be used to determine the identity of an individual patient shall be exempt from the disclosure requirements of the California Public Records Act. (2) Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care. Existing law provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance. The Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975 authorizes the director of the department to adopt, amend, and rescind any rules necessary to carry out the act and requires health care service plans to provide certain notices. This bill would authorize the director to, by regulation, modify the wording of any notice required by the act for purposes of clarity, readability, and accuracy. The bill would make other technical, nonsubstantive changes to related provisions governing health care service plans. (3) Existing law, known as the California Safe Drinking Water Act, requires the State Department of Public Health to administer provisions relating to the regulation of drinking water to protect public health. Existing law requires the department to adopt regulations it determines to be necessary to carry out the purposes of the California Safe Drinking Water Act. Existing law requires regulations adopted by the department to include requirements governing the use of point-of-entry treatment by public water systems in lieu of centralized treatment, as specified. This bill would require regulations adopted by the department to include requirements governing the use of point-of-entry and point-of-use treatment by public water systems in lieu of centralized treatment, as specified. The bill would also prohibit the department from issuing or amending a permit to allow the use of point-of-use treatment unless the department determines, after a public hearing, that there is no substantial community opposition. It would also limit the issuance of that permit to the lesser of 3 years or until funding for centralized treatment is available. (4) Under existing law, when a primary drinking water standard is not complied with, when a monitoring requirement is not performed, or when a water purveyor fails to comply with the conditions of a variance or exception, a public water system is required to notify the department and users, as specified. This bill would, if user notification is required pursuant to this provision, require the department to make a reasonable effort to ensure that notification is given. (5) Existing law provides that the department may issue a citation to a public water system that violates the California Safe Drinking Water Act. Existing law provides that for noncontinuing violations of primary drinking standards, other than turbidity, the department may assess a civil penalty in the citation, as specified. This bill would delete the exemption for turbidity. This bill would make other technical, nonsubstantive changes to related provisions governing the issuance of citations for violations of the California Safe Drinking Water Act. (6) Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services and under which qualified low-income persons receive health care benefits. Existing law requires that health care providers apply to, and be certified by, the department prior to their participation in the Medi-Cal program. Existing law allows the department to grant provisional provider status or preferred provisional provider status to an applicant or provider, and requires the department to terminate that status if any specified grounds exist. This bill would correct obsolete references in the above provisions. (7) Under existing law, the Medi‑Cal program is partially governed and funded as part of the federal Medicaid Program. Existing law requires the department to amend the Medicaid state plan with respect to the billing option for services by local educational agencies to ensure that schools are reimbursed for all eligible services that they provide that are not precluded by federal requirements. Existing law would repeal these provisions on January 1, 2010. This bill would change the repeal date to January 1, 2013. (8) Existing law establishes the Local Education Agency Medi‑Cal Recovery Account in the Special Deposit Fund, to be used only to support the department in meeting the requirements of the above provisions, and specifies a formula for funding and staffing activities provided for under these provisions. Existing law provides that as of January 1, 2010, unless the Legislature enacts a new statute or extends the date beyond January 1, 2010, all funds in the Local Education Agency Medi‑Cal Recovery Account shall be returned proportionately to all local education agencies whose federal Medicaid funds were used to create the account. This bill would rename the account the Local Educational Agency Medi‑Cal Recovery Fund. This bill would also provide that, as of January 1, 2013, unless the Legislature enacts a new statute or extends the repeal date, all funds in the Local Educational Agency Medi-Cal Recovery Fund shall be returned proportionally to all local educational agencies whose federal Medicaid funds were used to create the fund. (9) Existing law, until January 1, 2011, requests the University of California to establish the California Health Benefit Review Program to assess legislation proposing a mandated health benefit or service, as defined, to be provided by health care service plans and health insurers, and to prepare a written analysis in accordance with specified criteria. This bill would extend the repeal date of the above provisions to June 30, 2015. (10) Existing law requests the University of California to submit a report to the Governor and the Legislature no later than January 1, 2010, regarding the implementation of the above provisions. This bill would, instead, request the University of California to submit a report no later than January 1, 2014. (11) Existing law, for fiscal years 2006–07 to 2009–10, inclusive, provides funding for the University of California's implementation of the above provisions from a fee imposed upon health care service plans and health insurers, which would not exceed a total of $2,000,000, and is to be deposited in the Health Care Benefits Fund. This bill, instead, provides for the imposition of that fee for fiscal years 2010–11 to 2014–15, inclusive. (12) Existing law requires the State Department of Public Health to maintain a program for the control of tuberculosis. Existing law, until January 1, 2011, requires a local health department that elects to participate in the program to provide for certification for one year, by the local health officer, of tuberculin skin test technicians. This bill would delete the repeal date of these provisions, thereby extending the operation of these provisions indefinitely. (13) This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 6276.24 of the Government Code proposed by SB 359, that would become operative only if SB 359 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2010, and this bill is chaptered last. The bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 14043.28 of the Welfare and Institutions Code proposed by AB 839, that would become operative only if AB 839 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2010, and this bill is chaptered last.
Who sponsors AB 1540?
AB 1540 is sponsored by Committee on Health.
What is the current status of AB 1540?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 04, 2009. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 1540?
Track AB 1540 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 1540

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 1540

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →