SB 699 — Sales and use taxes: exemption: sustainable development: manufacturing.
Last action — Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The Sales and Use Tax Law imposes a tax on retailers measured by the gross receipts from the sale of tangible personal property sold at retail in this state, or on the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of tangible personal property purchased from a retailer for storage, use, or other consumption in this state, and provides various exemptions from the taxes imposed by that law. This bill would exempt from a specified portion of those taxes, for calendar years beginning on and after January 1, 2011, the gross receipts from the sale of, and the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of, sustainable development equipment investments of tangible personal property purchased for use by a qualified person, as specified, and tangible personal property used primarily during the research and development process on qualified research. The bill would also exempt from a specified portion of those taxes, for calendar years beginning on and after January 1, 2013, the gross receipts from the sale of, and the storage, use, or other consumption of, tangible personal property purchased by a qualified person for use primarily in any stage of the manufacturing, processing, refining, fabricating, or recycling of property, as specified, and tangible personal property purchased for use by a contractor purchasing that property for use in the performance of a construction contract for the qualified person who will use the property as an integral part of the manufacturing, processing, refining, fabricating, or recycling process, or as a storage facility for use in connection with the manufacturing process. This bill would specify that this exemption does not apply to local sales and use taxes or transactions and use taxes. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.
Bill Text
- Amended 05/28/09 - Amended Senate Current pdf May 28, 2009
- Amended 04/02/09 - Amended Senate pdf April 02, 2009
- Introduced 02/27/09 - Introduced pdf February 27, 2009
- SB699 View text html
Action History
-
Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
-
Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Set for hearing May 13.
-
Re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
To Com. on RLS.
-
Read first time.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 30.
-
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Tony Strickland · Cosponsor
- Alquist · Primary
- Blakeslee · Cosponsor
- Buchanan · Cosponsor
- Portantino · Cosponsor
- Calderon · Cosponsor
- Coto · Cosponsor
- Fuentes · Cosponsor
- Galgiani · Cosponsor
- Garrick · Cosponsor
- Harkey · Cosponsor
- Harman · Cosponsor
- Jeffries · Cosponsor
- Lieu · Cosponsor
- Maldonado · Cosponsor
- Ruskin · Cosponsor
- Walters · Cosponsor
- Roger W. Niello · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 17 co-sponsors · 104 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Alquist
Co-sponsors (17)
- Strickland, Tony Republican
- Blakeslee
- Buchanan
- Portantino
- Calderon
- Coto
- Fuentes
- Galgiani
- Garrick
- Harkey
- Harman
- Jeffries
- Lieu
- Maldonado
- Ruskin
- Walters
- Niello, Roger W. Republican
Not signed on (104)
104 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 104 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 699 do?
- The Sales and Use Tax Law imposes a tax on retailers measured by the gross receipts from the sale of tangible personal property sold at retail in this state, or on the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of tangible personal property purchased from a retailer for storage, use, or other consumption in this state, and provides various exemptions from the taxes imposed by that law. This bill would exempt from a specified portion of those taxes, for calendar years beginning on and after January 1, 2011, the gross receipts from the sale of, and the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of, sustainable development equipment investments of tangible personal property purchased for use by a qualified person, as specified, and tangible personal property used primarily during the research and development process on qualified research. The bill would also exempt from a specified portion of those taxes, for calendar years beginning on and after January 1, 2013, the gross receipts from the sale of, and the storage, use, or other consumption of, tangible personal property purchased by a qualified person for use primarily in any stage of the manufacturing, processing, refining, fabricating, or recycling of property, as specified, and tangible personal property purchased for use by a contractor purchasing that property for use in the performance of a construction contract for the qualified person who will use the property as an integral part of the manufacturing, processing, refining, fabricating, or recycling process, or as a storage facility for use in connection with the manufacturing process. This bill would specify that this exemption does not apply to local sales and use taxes or transactions and use taxes. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.
- Who sponsors SB 699?
- SB 699 is sponsored by Strickland, Tony (Republican), Alquist, Blakeslee, Buchanan, Portantino, Calderon, Coto, Fuentes, Galgiani, Garrick, Harkey, Harman, Jeffries, Lieu, Maldonado, Ruskin, Walters, and Niello, Roger W. (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 699?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 699?
- Track SB 699 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 699
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 699
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →