California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: Passed Assembly

AB 965 — State employees: memorandum of understanding.

Last action — From Senate committee without further action.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Under existing law, a provision of a memorandum of understanding reached between the state employer and a recognized employee organization representing state civil service employees that requires the expenditure of funds does not become effective unless approved by the Legislature in the annual Budget Act. This bill would approve provisions of a memorandum of understanding entered into between the state employer and State Bargaining Unit 10, the California Association of Professional Scientists, that require the expenditure of funds, and would provide that these provisions will become effective even if these provisions are approved by the Legislature in legislation other than the annual Budget Act. This bill would provide that provisions of the memorandum of understanding approved by this bill that require the expenditure of funds will not take effect unless funds for these provisions are specifically appropriated by the Legislature, and would require the state employer and the affected employee organization to meet and confer to renegotiate the affected provisions if funds for these provisions are not specifically appropriated by the Legislature.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From Senate committee without further action.

  2. Referred to Com. on P.E. & R.

  3. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  4. Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 49. Noes 29. Page 2039.)

  5. Read second time. To third reading.

  6. Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.

  7. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (May 28).

  8. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  9. From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (April 22).

  10. Referred to Com. on P.E.,R. & S.S.

  11. From printer. May be heard in committee March 29.

  12. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Retirement and Social Security Committee on Public Employees · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Committee on Public Employees, Retirement and Social Security

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

AB 965 P.E., R.& S.S. Assembly Third Reading By HERNANDEZ

Passed 58 Yea · 32 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 543002
Republican 1200
Democratic 3000
Total 583202
% of votes cast 63%35%0%2%
How each member voted (92)
Member Party Vote
Hagman — Nay
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Conway — Nay
Bill — Nay
Tom — Nay
Garrick — Nay
Gilmore — Nay
Yamada — Not Voting
Fletcher — Nay
Audra — Nay
Harkey — Nay
Cook — Nay
Jeffries — Nay
Logue — Nay
Miller — Nay
Nestande — Nay
Price — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Silva — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Bass — Yea
DeVore — Nay
Duvall — Nay
Villines — Nay
Evans — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Carter — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Charles — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huber — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Krekorian — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nava — Yea
Adams — Nay
Beall — Yea
Blakeslee — Nay
Block — Not Voting
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Knight — Nay
Ma — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Smyth — Nay
Torlakson — Yea
Tran — Nay
Emmerson — Nay
Eng — Yea
Coto — Yea
Davis — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Galgiani — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 16 Yea · 0 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 15005
Democratic 1000
Republican 0001
Total 16006
% of votes cast 73%0%0%27%
How each member voted (22)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Not Voting
Charles — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Audra — Not Voting
Krekorian — Yea
Davis — Yea
Duvall — Not Voting
Price — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Miller — Not Voting
Nielsen — Not Voting
Skinner — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

labor
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 965 do?
Under existing law, a provision of a memorandum of understanding reached between the state employer and a recognized employee organization representing state civil service employees that requires the expenditure of funds does not become effective unless approved by the Legislature in the annual Budget Act. This bill would approve provisions of a memorandum of understanding entered into between the state employer and State Bargaining Unit 10, the California Association of Professional Scientists, that require the expenditure of funds, and would provide that these provisions will become effective even if these provisions are approved by the Legislature in legislation other than the annual Budget Act. This bill would provide that provisions of the memorandum of understanding approved by this bill that require the expenditure of funds will not take effect unless funds for these provisions are specifically appropriated by the Legislature, and would require the state employer and the affected employee organization to meet and confer to renegotiate the affected provisions if funds for these provisions are not specifically appropriated by the Legislature.
Who sponsors AB 965?
AB 965 is sponsored by Committee on Public Employees, Retirement and Social Security.
What is the current status of AB 965?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 965?
Track AB 965 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 965

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 965

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →