California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate

SB 854 — Transportation.

Last action — Senate refuses to concur in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 12. Noes 18. Page 5257.)

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

(1) Existing law creates the California Transportation Commission, with various duties and responsibilities relative to the programming and allocation of funds for transportation capital projects. Existing law requires the commission to submit, by December 15 of each year, an annual report to the Legislature summarizing the commission's prior year decisions in allocating transportation capital funds and identifying timely and relevant transportation issues facing the state. Existing law, the Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006, authorizes the issuance of $19.25 billion of general obligation bonds for specified purposes, including $2 billion to be transferred to the Trade Corridors Improvement Fund to be available, upon appropriation in the annual Budget Act by the Legislature and subject to such conditions and criteria as the Legislature may provide by statute, for allocation by the commission. Existing law requires the Department of Transportation to, on or before February 18, 2009, report to specified committees of the Legislature a summary of any memorandum of understanding or any other agreement executed between a railroad company and any state or local transportation agency relative to any project funded with moneys allocated from the Trade Corridors Improvement Fund. This bill would instead require the commission to provide that report to specified committees of the Legislature within 30 days of receiving such a memorandum of understanding or executed agreement. The bill would also, commencing January 1, 2011, require the commission to provide semiannual reports to those committees on the status of all railroad projects programmed in the Trade Corridors Improvement Fund program. The bill would make these reporting requirements inoperative on January 1, 2015. (2) The Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006 also requires that $1,000,000,000 of bond funds be deposited in the Transit System Safety, Security, and Disaster Response Account, administered by the California Emergency Management Agency (Cal EMA) , for capital projects that provide increased protection against a security and safety threat, and for capital expenditures to increase the capacity of transit operators to develop disaster response transportation systems, as specified. Existing law requires 25% of available funds to be allocated to certain regional public waterborne transit agencies. Existing law requires entities receiving funds from that account to expend those funds within 3 fiscal years of the fiscal year in which the funds were allocated and requires that funds remaining unexpended after those 3 years revert to Cal EMA for reallocation in subsequent fiscal years. This bill, notwithstanding these provisions, would provide that entities receiving an allocation of the funds set aside for regional public waterborne transit agencies, relative to allocations of funds made prior to June 30, 2011, shall have 4 fiscal years from the last day of the fiscal year in which the funds were received by that entity to expend those funds. (3) Existing law requires funds from the Local Street and Road Improvement, Congestion Relief, and Traffic Safety Account of 2006 to be made available to the Controller for allocation to cities, counties, and a city and county, for purposes of the Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006, as specified. Upon receipt of funds, a city, county, or city and county is required to expend those funds within 3 fiscal years from the date that the funds are allocated to it by the Controller, and any funds not expended within that period are required to be returned to the Controller and reallocated to other cities, counties, or a city and county, as specified. Existing law establishes the Highway Users Tax Account in the Transportation Tax Fund for various purposes, including the research, planning, construction, improvement, maintenance, and operation of public streets and highways, the research and planning for exclusive public mass transit guideways, and the construction and improvement of exclusive public mass transit guideways, as specified. This bill would authorize a city, county, or city and county that receives these funds in a fiscal year in which funds from the Highway Users Tax Account are deferred, suspended, borrowed, or shifted, to expend those funds within 4 fiscal years from the last date of the fiscal year in which the funds are allocated to it by the Controller. (4) Existing law authorizes the Department of Transportation to transfer funds among 5 specified transportation funds or accounts as short-term loans, subject to certain conditions and any terms and conditions imposed by the Director of Finance. These provisions are inoperative on July 1, 2011, and are repealed on January 1, 2012. This bill would extend the inoperative and repeal dates of these provisions to July 1, 2014, and January 1, 2015, respectively. (5) Existing law, the California High-Speed Rail Act, creates the High-Speed Rail Authority to develop and implement a high-speed rail system in the state, with specified powers and duties. Existing law provides for appointment of an executive director by the authority, who is exempt from civil service and serves at the pleasure of the authority. Existing law requires the executive director to be paid a salary established by the authority and approved by the Department of Personnel Administration. This bill, for purposes of managing and administering the ongoing work of the authority in implementing the high-speed train project, would authorize the Governor, upon the recommendation of the executive director, to appoint up to 6 additional authority employees, exempt from civil service, who would serve in specified positions at the pleasure of the executive director. The bill would require a salary survey to be conducted to determine the compensation for the executive director and additional exempt employees, and would require the salaries to be established by the authority and approved by the Department of Personnel Administration. (6) Existing law requires the High-Speed Rail Authority to establish an independent peer review group for the purpose of reviewing the authority's plans and issuing analyses of the authority's assumptions and the authority's funding plan for each corridor. Existing law requires the peer review group to consist of persons meeting specified requirements and to be designated by certain public officers. This bill would require the initial designations to the peer group to be made by November 1, 2010. The bill would require the peer review group to designate a chairperson and would require the authority to designate a member of its staff to serve as a liaison to the peer review group. The bill would require members of the peer review group to receive specified per diem compensation and reimbursement for travel expenses. The bill would require the authority to provide a specified progress report to the Legislature commencing March 1, 2011, and biannually thereafter. (7) Existing law provides that the Department of Transportation has full possession and control of the state highway system. Existing law creates various programs to fund transportation capital improvement programs and provides for allocation of those funds. Existing law requires the department to prepare an annual budget, as specified for submission to the Governor. This bill would require the department to submit specified supplemental information by May 1 of each year to the Legislative Analyst and to the appropriations committees to substantiate the department's proposed capital outlay support budget. (8) Existing law, the Outdoor Advertising Act, provides for the regulation by the Department of Transportation of advertising displays, as defined, within view of public highways. This bill would enact the Transportation Revenue Partnership Act. The bill would authorize the department, upon approval of the Federal Highway Administration, to enter into an agreement pursuant to a competitive process for an experimental project to plan, develop, finance, maintain, and operate a network of changeable message signs within the rights-of-way of the state highway system, as specified. The bill would authorize the department to allow the person with whom it has entered into the agreement to place advertisements, meeting certain standards established by the department, on the changeable message signs when they are not being used by the department. The bill would require revenues derived from the experimental project to be allocated between the department and the person with whom the department has entered into the agreement and would require those revenues received by the department to be subject to appropriation by the Legislature. The bill would authorize the department to adopt guidelines and procedures relative to advertising on changeable message signs. The bill would require the department to submit specified reports to the fiscal ad policy committees of the Legislature having jurisdiction over transportation matters, and would prohibit an agreement from being entered into on or after January 1, 2014. (9) Existing law requires specified revenues from an increase in the gasoline excise tax, pursuant to Chapters 11 and 12 of the 8th Extraordinary Session of the Statutes of 2010, to be used to reimburse the General Fund for the amount needed for debt service on specified general obligation transportation bonds, and in the 2010–11 fiscal year, after the reimbursement of the General Fund, requires the sum of $54,167,000 per month to be held in the Highway Users Tax Account for future appropriation by the Legislature. This bill would instead require, in the 2010–11 fiscal year, after the reimbursement of the General Fund for debt service on those specified general obligation transportation bonds, the sum of $63,470,000 per month to be held in the account for future appropriation by the Legislature. Existing law also provides for apportionment by the Controller of a specified amount of gasoline excise tax revenues in the Highway Users Tax Account to cities and counties for local street and road purposes, including revenues from the increase in the gasoline excise tax, pursuant to Chapters 11 and 12 of the 8th Extraordinary Session of the Statutes of 2010. These revenues, including the revenues from the increase in the gasoline excise tax, are not subject to expenditure requirements and restrictions that were applicable to revenues from the gasoline sales tax that was repealed by the above-referenced legislation. This bill would clarify that the revenues apportioned to cities and counties from the increase in the gasoline excise tax may be used for any local street and road purpose and are not subject to the requirements and restrictions applicable to the former gasoline sales tax revenues. (10) Existing law designates the Commissioner of the California Highway Patrol as the Statewide Vehicle Theft Investigation and Apprehension Coordinator and authorizes the commissioner to establish vehicle theft prevention, investigation, and apprehension programs and to assist local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies in combating vehicle theft. Existing law requires the commissioner to submit a report to the Legislature, no later than 90 days following the end of the fiscal year, accounting for funds received and disbursed from the Motor Vehicle Account for the purposes of preventing and enhancing investigative efforts to deter economic automobile theft. This bill would authorize the Department of the California Highway Patrol to retain license plate data captured by a license plate reader (LPR) for not more than 72 hours unless the data is being used as evidence or for a legitimate law enforcement purpose. The bill would prohibit the department from selling the data or from making the data available to an agency that is not a law enforcement agency or an individual that is not a law enforcement officer. The bill would authorize the use of the data for purposes of locating vehicles or persons reasonably suspected of being involved in the commission of a public offense. The bill would require the department to monitor internal use of the data to prevent unauthorized use and to submit to the Legislature, as a part of the annual automobile theft report, information on the department's LPR practices and usage. (11) Under existing law, when the Department of Motor Vehicles determines that an applicant is lawfully entitled to a driver's license, the department is required to issue that license to the applicant. Existing law specifies the contents of a driver's license. Existing law requires that the front of an application for an original or renewal of a driver's license or identification card contain a space for an applicant to give his or her consent to be an organ and tissue donor upon death. This bill would also require the front of an application for an original or renewal of a driver's license or identification card to contain a space for an applicant to indicate whether he or she has served in the Armed Forces of the United States and to give his or her consent to be contacted regarding eligibility to receive state or federal veteran benefits. The bill would require the Department of Motor Vehicles to electronically transmit to the Department of Veterans Affairs specified information on an applicant who has identified on his or her application for a driver's license or identification card that he or she has served in the Armed Forces of the United States and consents to being contacted about veterans benefits. (12) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Senate refuses to concur in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 12. Noes 18. Page 5257.)

  2. Urgency clause refused adoption.

  3. In Senate. To unfinished business.

  4. Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 63. Noes 10. Page 7131.) To Senate.

  5. Read third time. Amended. (Page 7114.) To third reading.

  6. Read second time. To third reading.

  7. Placed on second reading file.

  8. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  9. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 24. Noes 5. Page 3268.) To Assembly.

  10. Read second time. To third reading.

  11. Placed on second reading file.

  12. Withdrawn from committee.

  13. To Com. on RLS.

  14. From print. May be acted upon on or after February 11.

  15. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 3 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Failed 12 Yea · 18 Nay · 10 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 111709
Republican 1000
Democratic 0101
Total 1218010
% of votes cast 30%45%0%25%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Nay
Hancock — Nay
Cogdill — Yea
Corbett — Nay
Hollingsworth — Yea
Runner — Yea
Huff — Yea
Leno — Nay
Liu — Nay
Lowenthal — Nay
Ducheny — Not Voting
Negrete — Not Voting
Alquist — Not Voting
Ashburn — Yea
Blakeslee — Not Voting
Dutton — Yea
Pavley — Nay
Price — Nay
Romero — Nay
Simitian — Nay
McLeod — Not Voting
Oropeza — Not Voting
Steinberg — Not Voting
Wiggins — Not Voting
Aanestad — Not Voting
Harman — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wolk — Nay
Wright — Nay
Cedillo — Nay
Wyland — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Correa — Nay
DeSaulnier — Nay
Denham — Nay
Florez — Nay
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Nay
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Not Voting
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 72 Yea · 11 Nay · 7 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 671007
Democratic 3000
Republican 2100
Total 721107
% of votes cast 80%12%0%8%
How each member voted (90)
Member Party Vote
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Bill — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Gilmore — Yea
Charles — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Huber — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
Bass — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cook — Yea
Coto — Yea
Davis — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Knight — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Nava — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Norby — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Silva — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torres — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Audra — Nay
Tom — Not Voting
De — Not Voting
Leon — Not Voting
Portantino — Not Voting
Salas — Not Voting
Saldana — Not Voting
Fuller — Nay
Harkey — Nay
Miller — Nay
Adams — Nay
Tran — Yea
Villines — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Lieu — Nay
Logue — Nay
Monning — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Eng — Yea
Evans — Yea
DeVore — Nay
Yamada — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 25 Yea · 5 Nay · 10 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 234010
Democratic 2000
Republican 0100
Total 255010
% of votes cast 63%13%0%25%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Florez — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Harman — Not Voting
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Cogdill — Not Voting
Huff — Not Voting
Leno — Yea
Runner — Not Voting
Liu — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Correa — Yea
Cox — Not Voting
Oropeza — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Ashburn — Nay
Ducheny — Yea
Dutton — Nay
Price — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Aanestad — Not Voting
Hollingsworth — Not Voting
Kehoe — Yea
Maldonado — Not Voting
Romero — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wiggins — Not Voting
Wyland — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Not Voting
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 854 do?
(1) Existing law creates the California Transportation Commission, with various duties and responsibilities relative to the programming and allocation of funds for transportation capital projects. Existing law requires the commission to submit, by December 15 of each year, an annual report to the Legislature summarizing the commission's prior year decisions in allocating transportation capital funds and identifying timely and relevant transportation issues facing the state. Existing law, the Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006, authorizes the issuance of $19.25 billion of general obligation bonds for specified purposes, including $2 billion to be transferred to the Trade Corridors Improvement Fund to be available, upon appropriation in the annual Budget Act by the Legislature and subject to such conditions and criteria as the Legislature may provide by statute, for allocation by the commission. Existing law requires the Department of Transportation to, on or before February 18, 2009, report to specified committees of the Legislature a summary of any memorandum of understanding or any other agreement executed between a railroad company and any state or local transportation agency relative to any project funded with moneys allocated from the Trade Corridors Improvement Fund. This bill would instead require the commission to provide that report to specified committees of the Legislature within 30 days of receiving such a memorandum of understanding or executed agreement. The bill would also, commencing January 1, 2011, require the commission to provide semiannual reports to those committees on the status of all railroad projects programmed in the Trade Corridors Improvement Fund program. The bill would make these reporting requirements inoperative on January 1, 2015. (2) The Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006 also requires that $1,000,000,000 of bond funds be deposited in the Transit System Safety, Security, and Disaster Response Account, administered by the California Emergency Management Agency (Cal EMA) , for capital projects that provide increased protection against a security and safety threat, and for capital expenditures to increase the capacity of transit operators to develop disaster response transportation systems, as specified. Existing law requires 25% of available funds to be allocated to certain regional public waterborne transit agencies. Existing law requires entities receiving funds from that account to expend those funds within 3 fiscal years of the fiscal year in which the funds were allocated and requires that funds remaining unexpended after those 3 years revert to Cal EMA for reallocation in subsequent fiscal years. This bill, notwithstanding these provisions, would provide that entities receiving an allocation of the funds set aside for regional public waterborne transit agencies, relative to allocations of funds made prior to June 30, 2011, shall have 4 fiscal years from the last day of the fiscal year in which the funds were received by that entity to expend those funds. (3) Existing law requires funds from the Local Street and Road Improvement, Congestion Relief, and Traffic Safety Account of 2006 to be made available to the Controller for allocation to cities, counties, and a city and county, for purposes of the Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006, as specified. Upon receipt of funds, a city, county, or city and county is required to expend those funds within 3 fiscal years from the date that the funds are allocated to it by the Controller, and any funds not expended within that period are required to be returned to the Controller and reallocated to other cities, counties, or a city and county, as specified. Existing law establishes the Highway Users Tax Account in the Transportation Tax Fund for various purposes, including the research, planning, construction, improvement, maintenance, and operation of public streets and highways, the research and planning for exclusive public mass transit guideways, and the construction and improvement of exclusive public mass transit guideways, as specified. This bill would authorize a city, county, or city and county that receives these funds in a fiscal year in which funds from the Highway Users Tax Account are deferred, suspended, borrowed, or shifted, to expend those funds within 4 fiscal years from the last date of the fiscal year in which the funds are allocated to it by the Controller. (4) Existing law authorizes the Department of Transportation to transfer funds among 5 specified transportation funds or accounts as short-term loans, subject to certain conditions and any terms and conditions imposed by the Director of Finance. These provisions are inoperative on July 1, 2011, and are repealed on January 1, 2012. This bill would extend the inoperative and repeal dates of these provisions to July 1, 2014, and January 1, 2015, respectively. (5) Existing law, the California High-Speed Rail Act, creates the High-Speed Rail Authority to develop and implement a high-speed rail system in the state, with specified powers and duties. Existing law provides for appointment of an executive director by the authority, who is exempt from civil service and serves at the pleasure of the authority. Existing law requires the executive director to be paid a salary established by the authority and approved by the Department of Personnel Administration. This bill, for purposes of managing and administering the ongoing work of the authority in implementing the high-speed train project, would authorize the Governor, upon the recommendation of the executive director, to appoint up to 6 additional authority employees, exempt from civil service, who would serve in specified positions at the pleasure of the executive director. The bill would require a salary survey to be conducted to determine the compensation for the executive director and additional exempt employees, and would require the salaries to be established by the authority and approved by the Department of Personnel Administration. (6) Existing law requires the High-Speed Rail Authority to establish an independent peer review group for the purpose of reviewing the authority's plans and issuing analyses of the authority's assumptions and the authority's funding plan for each corridor. Existing law requires the peer review group to consist of persons meeting specified requirements and to be designated by certain public officers. This bill would require the initial designations to the peer group to be made by November 1, 2010. The bill would require the peer review group to designate a chairperson and would require the authority to designate a member of its staff to serve as a liaison to the peer review group. The bill would require members of the peer review group to receive specified per diem compensation and reimbursement for travel expenses. The bill would require the authority to provide a specified progress report to the Legislature commencing March 1, 2011, and biannually thereafter. (7) Existing law provides that the Department of Transportation has full possession and control of the state highway system. Existing law creates various programs to fund transportation capital improvement programs and provides for allocation of those funds. Existing law requires the department to prepare an annual budget, as specified for submission to the Governor. This bill would require the department to submit specified supplemental information by May 1 of each year to the Legislative Analyst and to the appropriations committees to substantiate the department's proposed capital outlay support budget. (8) Existing law, the Outdoor Advertising Act, provides for the regulation by the Department of Transportation of advertising displays, as defined, within view of public highways. This bill would enact the Transportation Revenue Partnership Act. The bill would authorize the department, upon approval of the Federal Highway Administration, to enter into an agreement pursuant to a competitive process for an experimental project to plan, develop, finance, maintain, and operate a network of changeable message signs within the rights-of-way of the state highway system, as specified. The bill would authorize the department to allow the person with whom it has entered into the agreement to place advertisements, meeting certain standards established by the department, on the changeable message signs when they are not being used by the department. The bill would require revenues derived from the experimental project to be allocated between the department and the person with whom the department has entered into the agreement and would require those revenues received by the department to be subject to appropriation by the Legislature. The bill would authorize the department to adopt guidelines and procedures relative to advertising on changeable message signs. The bill would require the department to submit specified reports to the fiscal ad policy committees of the Legislature having jurisdiction over transportation matters, and would prohibit an agreement from being entered into on or after January 1, 2014. (9) Existing law requires specified revenues from an increase in the gasoline excise tax, pursuant to Chapters 11 and 12 of the 8th Extraordinary Session of the Statutes of 2010, to be used to reimburse the General Fund for the amount needed for debt service on specified general obligation transportation bonds, and in the 2010–11 fiscal year, after the reimbursement of the General Fund, requires the sum of $54,167,000 per month to be held in the Highway Users Tax Account for future appropriation by the Legislature. This bill would instead require, in the 2010–11 fiscal year, after the reimbursement of the General Fund for debt service on those specified general obligation transportation bonds, the sum of $63,470,000 per month to be held in the account for future appropriation by the Legislature. Existing law also provides for apportionment by the Controller of a specified amount of gasoline excise tax revenues in the Highway Users Tax Account to cities and counties for local street and road purposes, including revenues from the increase in the gasoline excise tax, pursuant to Chapters 11 and 12 of the 8th Extraordinary Session of the Statutes of 2010. These revenues, including the revenues from the increase in the gasoline excise tax, are not subject to expenditure requirements and restrictions that were applicable to revenues from the gasoline sales tax that was repealed by the above-referenced legislation. This bill would clarify that the revenues apportioned to cities and counties from the increase in the gasoline excise tax may be used for any local street and road purpose and are not subject to the requirements and restrictions applicable to the former gasoline sales tax revenues. (10) Existing law designates the Commissioner of the California Highway Patrol as the Statewide Vehicle Theft Investigation and Apprehension Coordinator and authorizes the commissioner to establish vehicle theft prevention, investigation, and apprehension programs and to assist local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies in combating vehicle theft. Existing law requires the commissioner to submit a report to the Legislature, no later than 90 days following the end of the fiscal year, accounting for funds received and disbursed from the Motor Vehicle Account for the purposes of preventing and enhancing investigative efforts to deter economic automobile theft. This bill would authorize the Department of the California Highway Patrol to retain license plate data captured by a license plate reader (LPR) for not more than 72 hours unless the data is being used as evidence or for a legitimate law enforcement purpose. The bill would prohibit the department from selling the data or from making the data available to an agency that is not a law enforcement agency or an individual that is not a law enforcement officer. The bill would authorize the use of the data for purposes of locating vehicles or persons reasonably suspected of being involved in the commission of a public offense. The bill would require the department to monitor internal use of the data to prevent unauthorized use and to submit to the Legislature, as a part of the annual automobile theft report, information on the department's LPR practices and usage. (11) Under existing law, when the Department of Motor Vehicles determines that an applicant is lawfully entitled to a driver's license, the department is required to issue that license to the applicant. Existing law specifies the contents of a driver's license. Existing law requires that the front of an application for an original or renewal of a driver's license or identification card contain a space for an applicant to give his or her consent to be an organ and tissue donor upon death. This bill would also require the front of an application for an original or renewal of a driver's license or identification card to contain a space for an applicant to indicate whether he or she has served in the Armed Forces of the United States and to give his or her consent to be contacted regarding eligibility to receive state or federal veteran benefits. The bill would require the Department of Motor Vehicles to electronically transmit to the Department of Veterans Affairs specified information on an applicant who has identified on his or her application for a driver's license or identification card that he or she has served in the Armed Forces of the United States and consents to being contacted about veterans benefits. (12) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Who sponsors SB 854?
SB 854 is sponsored by Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review.
What is the current status of SB 854?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 854?
Track SB 854 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 854

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 854

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →