California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: Passed Assembly

AB 1665 — School employees: scope of representation.

Last action — From Senate committee without further action.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

(1) Existing law gives public school employee organizations the right to represent their members in their employment relations with public school employers, and limits the scope of representation to matters relating to wages, hours of employment, and other terms and conditions of employment, as defined. Existing law provides that subjects other than those specified may not be included as part of collective bargaining. This bill would require public school employers to give reasonable written notice to the exclusive representative of classified personnel of a public school employer's intent to make any change to matters within the scope of representation, including, but not necessarily limited to, start time. The bill would also require public school employers to provide a recognized employee organization with the opportunity to meet and negotiate with the public school employer. The bill would require, in cases of emergency when the public school employer determines that a rule, policy, or procedure must be adopted immediately, that the public school employer give this notice and opportunity to meet and negotiate at the earliest practicable time following the adoption of the rule, policy, or procedure. This bill would also make various nonsubstantive technical and conforming changes. Because the bill would impose new duties on public school employers, it would constitute a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From Senate committee without further action.

  2. In committee: Set first hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.

  3. Referred to Com. on P.E. & R.

  4. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  5. Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 49. Noes 28. Page 5554.)

  6. Read second time. To third reading.

  7. Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.

  8. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 28).

  9. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  10. From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (April 21).

  11. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  12. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  13. Re-referred to Com. on P.E.,R. & S.S.

  14. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on P.E.,R. & S.S. Read second time and amended.

  15. Referred to Com. on P.E.,R. & S.S.

  16. From printer. May be heard in committee February 20.

  17. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Swanson · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Swanson

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

AB 1665 SWANSON Assembly Third Reading

Passed 58 Yea · 29 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 552703
Democratic 2100
Republican 1101
Total 582904
% of votes cast 64%32%0%4%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Yea
Carter — Yea
Charles — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bass — Yea
Beall — Yea
Eng — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Cook — Nay
Bill — Nay
Feuer — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Fletcher — Nay
Tom — Not Voting
Blakeslee — Nay
Coto — Yea
Gilmore — Nay
Hagman — Nay
Harkey — Nay
Hayashi — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huber — Yea
Jeffries — Nay
Knight — Nay
Logue — Nay
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Nay
Nava — Yea
Nestande — Nay
Norby — Nay
Ruskin — Yea
Silva — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Smyth — Nay
Swanson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Tran — Nay
Audra — Not Voting
Adams — Nay
Anderson — Nay
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Ma — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Villines — Nay
Conway — Nay
Emmerson — Nay
Evans — Yea
Davis — Yea
DeVore — Nay
Fuller — Nay
Garrick — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Nay
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Strickland, Tony Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 13 Yea · 5 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 12500
Democratic 1000
Total 13500
% of votes cast 72%28%0%0%
How each member voted (18)
Member Party Vote
Conway — Nay
Miller — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Coto — Yea
Charles — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Monning — Yea
Norby — Nay
Ruskin — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Davis — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

labor education
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 1665 do?
(1) Existing law gives public school employee organizations the right to represent their members in their employment relations with public school employers, and limits the scope of representation to matters relating to wages, hours of employment, and other terms and conditions of employment, as defined. Existing law provides that subjects other than those specified may not be included as part of collective bargaining. This bill would require public school employers to give reasonable written notice to the exclusive representative of classified personnel of a public school employer's intent to make any change to matters within the scope of representation, including, but not necessarily limited to, start time. The bill would also require public school employers to provide a recognized employee organization with the opportunity to meet and negotiate with the public school employer. The bill would require, in cases of emergency when the public school employer determines that a rule, policy, or procedure must be adopted immediately, that the public school employer give this notice and opportunity to meet and negotiate at the earliest practicable time following the adoption of the rule, policy, or procedure. This bill would also make various nonsubstantive technical and conforming changes. Because the bill would impose new duties on public school employers, it would constitute a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Who sponsors AB 1665?
AB 1665 is sponsored by Swanson.
What is the current status of AB 1665?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 1665?
Track AB 1665 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 1665

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 1665

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →