Food stamps: eligibility: drug felonies.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1198 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1198.
You're tracking AB 1198
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1198 — Food stamps: eligibility: drug felonies.
Last action — From Senate committee without further action.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law provides for the Food Stamp Program, under which food stamps allocated to the state by the federal government are distributed to eligible individuals by each county. Existing law provides that a person convicted of a drug-related felony, with certain exceptions, is eligible for aid under the Food Stamp Program, if specified drug treatment conditions are met. This bill would remove the limitation that excepts certain drug-related felonies from these provisions. The bill would authorize the State Department of Social Services to implement its provisions through an all-county letter or similar instructions from the director. By changing the eligibility standards under the Food Stamp Program, this bill would increase the responsibilities of counties in the administration of the program, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removed1 line(s) added, 1 removed.
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBillText Information PDF2 Add To My Favorites | Version:
View plain text versions (2)
- Introduced 02/27/09 - Introduced Current pdf February 27, 2009
- AB1198 View text html
Action History
-
From Senate committee without further action.
-
In committee: Held under submission.
-
In committee: Placed on Appropriations suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 3. Noes 2.) (June 23).
-
Referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 45. Noes 31. Page 1749.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 4.) (May 20).
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (April 28).
-
Referred to Com. on HUM. S.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.
-
Introduced. To print.
Sponsors
- Swanson · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Swanson
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 40% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 48 | 32 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 54 | 34 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 59% | 37% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (92)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Bill | — | Nay |
| Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Tom | — | Nay |
| Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Gaines | — | Nay |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Gilmore | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Nay |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Krekorian | — | Not Voting |
| Lieu | — | Nay |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Not Voting |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Nay |
| Villines | — | Nay |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Block | — | Not Voting |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Not Voting |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Nay |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 14 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 15 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 24% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (21)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Duvall | — | Nay |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Not Voting |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 63% | 38% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (8)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Nay |
| Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1198 do?
- Existing law provides for the Food Stamp Program, under which food stamps allocated to the state by the federal government are distributed to eligible individuals by each county. Existing law provides that a person convicted of a drug-related felony, with certain exceptions, is eligible for aid under the Food Stamp Program, if specified drug treatment conditions are met. This bill would remove the limitation that excepts certain drug-related felonies from these provisions. The bill would authorize the State Department of Social Services to implement its provisions through an all-county letter or similar instructions from the director. By changing the eligibility standards under the Food Stamp Program, this bill would increase the responsibilities of counties in the administration of the program, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
- Who sponsors AB 1198?
- AB 1198 is sponsored by Swanson.
- What is the current status of AB 1198?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1198?
- Track AB 1198 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1198
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1198
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →