Public employment: County of Alameda.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1667 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1667.
You're tracking AB 1667
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1667 — Public employment: County of Alameda.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 81, Statutes of 2010.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 20, 2010. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 5 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
The County Employees Retirement Law of 1937 authorizes, until January 1, 2011, the board of supervisors of the Counties of Solano and Santa Barbara to, by resolution, ordinance, contract, or contract amendment, provide different retirement benefits for some safety member bargaining units within the safety member classification of a county retirement system, as specified. This bill would authorize the Board of Supervisors of the County of Alameda, by resolution adopted by majority vote as part of any negotiated memorandum of understanding with a bargaining unit that represents safety employees, to require a safety employee of that bargaining unit or unrepresented safety employee hired after approval of the resolution, to elect in writing a permanent choice between 2 specified pension calculations, as specified. The bill would also authorize the board to adopt a resolution by majority vote to provide a different formula or calculation of retirement benefits for new members of other safety bargaining units or other unrepresented safety employees hired after approval of the resolution, as specified, or to provide a different formula or calculation of safety retirement benefits for new safety members in one bargaining unit than that which is provided for new safety members of other bargaining units or new unrepresented safety members. The bill would also specify that the board shall not require that a bargaining unit be divided solely for the purpose of providing different retirement benefits. The bill would authorize the board to separately negotiate retirement benefits with a bargaining unit if the members of that bargaining unit so elect. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 07/15/10 - Chaptered Current pdf July 15, 2010
- Enrolled 07/02/10 - Enrolled pdf July 02, 2010
- Amended 05/06/10 - Amended Assembly pdf May 06, 2010
- Amended 04/27/10 - Amended Assembly pdf April 27, 2010
- Amended 04/05/10 - Amended Assembly pdf April 05, 2010
- Amended 03/02/10 - Amended Assembly pdf March 02, 2010
- Introduced 01/20/10 - Introduced pdf January 20, 2010
- AB1667 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 81, Statutes of 2010.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and to the Governor at 2 p.m.
-
In Assembly. To enrollment.
-
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed and to Assembly. (Ayes 34. Noes 0. Page 4203.)
-
Ordered to Special Consent Calendar.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 28).
-
Referred to Com. on P.E. & R.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed and to Senate. (Ayes 72. Noes 0. Page 5236.)
-
To Consent Calendar.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5.
-
Read second time. To Consent Calendar.
-
(Corrected May 13.)
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. To Consent Calendar. (May 5).
-
Re-referred to Com. on P.E.,R. & S.S.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on P.E.,R. & S.S. Read second time and amended.
-
Re-referred to Com. on P.E.,R. & S.S.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on P.E.,R. & S.S. Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on P.E.,R. & S.S. Re-referred. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (March 11).
-
Re-referred to Com. on RULES by unanimous consent.
-
Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. & E. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on L. & E.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee February 20.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Swanson · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Swanson
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 32 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 35 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 0% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Not Voting |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 74 | 0 | 0 | 11 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 80 | 0 | 0 | 11 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 0% | 0% | 12% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| De | — | Not Voting |
| La | — | Not Voting |
| Torre | — | Not Voting |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Not Voting |
| John | — | Not Voting |
| A. | — | Not Voting |
| Perez | — | Not Voting |
| Nava | — | Not Voting |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Not Voting |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Not Voting |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Not Voting |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 0% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Not Voting |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1667 do?
- The County Employees Retirement Law of 1937 authorizes, until January 1, 2011, the board of supervisors of the Counties of Solano and Santa Barbara to, by resolution, ordinance, contract, or contract amendment, provide different retirement benefits for some safety member bargaining units within the safety member classification of a county retirement system, as specified. This bill would authorize the Board of Supervisors of the County of Alameda, by resolution adopted by majority vote as part of any negotiated memorandum of understanding with a bargaining unit that represents safety employees, to require a safety employee of that bargaining unit or unrepresented safety employee hired after approval of the resolution, to elect in writing a permanent choice between 2 specified pension calculations, as specified. The bill would also authorize the board to adopt a resolution by majority vote to provide a different formula or calculation of retirement benefits for new members of other safety bargaining units or other unrepresented safety employees hired after approval of the resolution, as specified, or to provide a different formula or calculation of safety retirement benefits for new safety members in one bargaining unit than that which is provided for new safety members of other bargaining units or new unrepresented safety members. The bill would also specify that the board shall not require that a bargaining unit be divided solely for the purpose of providing different retirement benefits. The bill would authorize the board to separately negotiate retirement benefits with a bargaining unit if the members of that bargaining unit so elect. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
- Who sponsors AB 1667?
- AB 1667 is sponsored by Swanson.
- What is the current status of AB 1667?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 20, 2010. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 1667?
- Track AB 1667 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1667
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1667
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →