California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: To Executive 1 R cosponsors

SB 945 — Juvenile court jurisdiction: services and benefits.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 631, Statutes of 2010.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law provides that a minor may be adjudged a dependent child or a ward of the juvenile court under specified circumstances. Existing law authorizes the court to place a minor who has been removed from the custody of his or her parent or guardian in foster care, among other placements. Existing law provides for the termination of the juvenile court jurisdiction when the minor reaches a specified age. Existing law authorizes the State Department of Social Services to develop statewide standards for the implementation and administration of the Independent Living Program. Existing regulations specify eligibility requirements for the Independent Living Program, and require county social workers and probation officers to determine eligibility for the program in conjunction with the preparation of a Transitional Independent Living Plan. An existing regulation requires county social workers and probation officers to ensure that foster or probation youth are given appropriate information about the opportunity to participate in the Independent Living Program. This bill would require a probation officer or parole officer, whenever the juvenile court terminates jurisdiction over a ward, or upon release of a ward from a facility that is not a foster care facility, to provide to the person a written notice stating that the person is a former foster child and may be eligible for the services and benefits that are available to a former foster child through public and private programs, and information that informs the person of the availability of assistance to enable the ward to apply for, and gain acceptance into, federal and state programs that provide independent living services and benefits to former foster children for which the person is or may be eligible. The bill would make related findings and declarations. By imposing additional duties upon probation officers, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. Existing law establishes that a case plan, which is required to be adopted by the county for each child receiving child welfare services, is the foundation and central unifying tool in child welfare services. Existing law requires that a case plan include information about a parent's incarceration in a jail or prison during the time that a minor child of that parent is involved in dependency care. This bill would delete duplicative provisions of that law. The bill also would incorporate additional changes in Section 16501.1 of the Welfare and Institutions Code proposed by AB 12 and SB 1353, to be operative only if this bill and one or both of the other bills are chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2011, and this bill is chaptered last. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 631, Statutes of 2010.

  2. Approved by Governor.

  3. Enrolled. To Governor at 4 p.m.

  4. Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 34. Noes 0. Page 4977.) To enrollment.

  5. In Senate. To unfinished business.

  6. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 72. Noes 2. Page 6741.) To Senate.

  7. Assembly Rule 69(d) suspended. (Ayes 49. Noes 27. Page 6644.)

  8. Read third time. Amended. (Page 6607.) To third reading.

  9. Assembly Rule 69(d) suspended. (Page 6463.)

  10. Read third time. Amended. (Page 6423.) To third reading.

  11. (August 12 amended measure version corrected August 16.)

  12. Read third time. Amended. (Page 6174.) To third reading.

  13. Read second time. To third reading.

  14. (Heard in committee on June 30).

  15. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 1.)

  16. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  17. (Heard in committee on June 15.)

  18. From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  19. To Com. on HUM. S.

  20. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  21. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 30. Noes 0. Page 3481.) To Assembly.

  22. To Special Consent Calendar.

  23. Read second time. To third reading.

  24. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 3427.)

  25. Set for hearing May 3.

  26. From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3308.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  27. Set for hearing April 20.

  28. From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on PUB. S. (Ayes 4. Noes 0. Page 3162.) Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  29. Set for hearing April 13.

  30. Re-referred to Coms. on HUMAN S. and PUB. S.

  31. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  32. Withdrawn from committee.

  33. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  34. To Com. on JUD.

  35. From print. May be acted upon on or after March 6.

  36. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Liu

Co-sponsors (1)

Not signed on (120)

120 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 120 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 35 Yea · 0 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 33004
Republican 1000
Democratic 1001
Total 35005
% of votes cast 88%0%0%13%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Cogdill — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Florez — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Hollingsworth — Yea
Huff — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Ashburn — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Liu — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Runner — Not Voting
Oropeza — Not Voting
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Aanestad — Yea
Harman — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Romero — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wiggins — Not Voting
Wyland — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Correa — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Not Voting
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 82 Yea · 2 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 2001
Unaffiliated 77205
Republican 3000
Total 82206
% of votes cast 91%2%0%7%
How each member voted (90)
Member Party Vote
Bill — Yea
Tom — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bass — Yea
Beall — Yea
Evans — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Furutani — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Audra — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Charles — Not Voting
De — Not Voting
Leon — Not Voting
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cook — Yea
Gilmore — Not Voting
Hagman — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Huber — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Knight — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nava — Yea
Norby — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Silva — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Tran — Not Voting
Villines — Yea
Adams — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hill — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Logue — Yea
Ma — Yea
Nestande — Nay
Nielsen — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Carter — Yea
Coto — Yea
Eng — Yea
Davis — Yea
DeVore — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 17 Yea · 1 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 16101
Democratic 1000
Total 17101
% of votes cast 89%5%0%5%
How each member voted (19)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Yea
Conway — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Charles — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Norby — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Miller — Not Voting
Nielsen — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Coto — Yea
Davis — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 31 Yea · 0 Nay · 8 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 29007
Democratic 2000
Republican 0001
Total 31008
% of votes cast 79%0%0%21%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Cogdill — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Hollingsworth — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Ashburn — Yea
Runner — Yea
Corbett — Not Voting
Dutton — Not Voting
Harman — Not Voting
Liu — Not Voting
McLeod — Yea
Oropeza — Not Voting
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Aanestad — Yea
Huff — Yea
Leno — Yea
Romero — Yea
Wiggins — Not Voting
Wyland — Yea
Correa — Yea
Cox — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Not Voting
Florez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 9 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 9002
Total 9002
% of votes cast 82%0%0%18%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Cox — Yea
Leno — Yea
Walters — Yea
Alquist — Not Voting
Kehoe — Yea
Price — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Denham — Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 945 do?
Existing law provides that a minor may be adjudged a dependent child or a ward of the juvenile court under specified circumstances. Existing law authorizes the court to place a minor who has been removed from the custody of his or her parent or guardian in foster care, among other placements. Existing law provides for the termination of the juvenile court jurisdiction when the minor reaches a specified age. Existing law authorizes the State Department of Social Services to develop statewide standards for the implementation and administration of the Independent Living Program. Existing regulations specify eligibility requirements for the Independent Living Program, and require county social workers and probation officers to determine eligibility for the program in conjunction with the preparation of a Transitional Independent Living Plan. An existing regulation requires county social workers and probation officers to ensure that foster or probation youth are given appropriate information about the opportunity to participate in the Independent Living Program. This bill would require a probation officer or parole officer, whenever the juvenile court terminates jurisdiction over a ward, or upon release of a ward from a facility that is not a foster care facility, to provide to the person a written notice stating that the person is a former foster child and may be eligible for the services and benefits that are available to a former foster child through public and private programs, and information that informs the person of the availability of assistance to enable the ward to apply for, and gain acceptance into, federal and state programs that provide independent living services and benefits to former foster children for which the person is or may be eligible. The bill would make related findings and declarations. By imposing additional duties upon probation officers, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. Existing law establishes that a case plan, which is required to be adopted by the county for each child receiving child welfare services, is the foundation and central unifying tool in child welfare services. Existing law requires that a case plan include information about a parent's incarceration in a jail or prison during the time that a minor child of that parent is involved in dependency care. This bill would delete duplicative provisions of that law. The bill also would incorporate additional changes in Section 16501.1 of the Welfare and Institutions Code proposed by AB 12 and SB 1353, to be operative only if this bill and one or both of the other bills are chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2011, and this bill is chaptered last. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Who sponsors SB 945?
SB 945 is sponsored by Liu and Jones, Brian W. (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 945?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 945?
Track SB 945 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 945

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 945

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →