Employment: apprenticeship programs.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 395 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 395.
You're tracking AB 395
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 395 — Employment: apprenticeship programs.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 438, Statutes of 2009.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 23, 2009. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 8 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Under existing law, the Director of Industrial Relations is the Administrator of Apprenticeship and is authorized to appoint assistants necessary to effectuate the purposes of state law governing apprenticeships. Existing law requires, with certain exceptions, that all workers employed on public works be paid not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed and establishes prevailing wage requirements with regard to holiday and overtime work. Existing law requires that every apprentice employed on public works projects be paid the prevailing rate of per diem wages for apprentices in the trade for which he or she is registered and that employers who employ apprentices on public works projects comply with other specified provisions. Existing law exempts certain public works projects from the prevailing wage requirements applicable to workers if the awarding body contracting for public work initiates and enforces a labor compliance program that meets specific statutory and regulatory requirements and ensures compliance with prevailing rate wage laws. Existing law requires that all labor compliance programs obtain the approval of the director. This bill would provide that an awarding body that implements an approved labor compliance program may, upon mutual agreement with the Chief of the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and at his or her discretion, assist the director in the enforcement of prevailing rate wage laws and other requirements that apply to apprenticeships in public works projects through the operation of that approved labor compliance program under terms and conditions prescribed by the Chief of the Division of Apprenticeship Standards. The bill would allow a contractor to appeal the result of a labor compliance program enforcement action related to apprenticeships in public works projects through specified procedures. The bill would provide that, if the involvement of the Chief of the Division of Apprenticeship Standards in a labor compliance program enforcement action is limited to a review of an assessment and the matter is resolved without litigation, the awarding body that has implemented the labor compliance program shall enforce any applicable penalties and shall deposit any penalties and forfeitures collected in its general fund.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/11/09 - Chaptered Current pdf October 11, 2009
- Enrolled 09/11/09 - Enrolled pdf September 11, 2009
- Amended 07/06/09 - Amended Senate pdf July 06, 2009
- Introduced 02/23/09 - Introduced pdf February 23, 2009
- AB395 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 438, Statutes of 2009.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and to the Governor at 1 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 54. Noes 21. Page 3224.)
-
Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Ayes 50. Noes 26. Page 3191.)
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 10 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Assembly. (Ayes 26. Noes 13. Page 2202.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
(received by desk August 28, 2009 pursuant to JR61(a)(11))
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 4.) (August 27).
-
In committee: Placed on Appropriations suspense file.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (June 25).
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 51. Noes 28. Page 1878.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 28).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (April 1).
-
Referred to Com. on L. & E.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 26.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Fuentes · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 3 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Fuentes
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 60 | 20 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 64 | 22 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 70% | 24% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Tom | — | Not Voting |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Duvall | — | Not Voting |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Mendoza | — | Not Voting |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Villines | — | Nay |
| Adams | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Nay |
| Emmerson | — | Not Voting |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Nay |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 25 | 12 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 27 | 13 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 66% | 32% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (41)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Nay |
| Hollingsworth | — | Nay |
| Cogdill | — | Nay |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Ashburn | — | Nay |
| Benoit | — | Nay |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 69% | 31% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Nay |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 83% | 17% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Nay |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 54 | 29 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 60 | 31 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 65% | 34% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (92)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Bill | — | Nay |
| Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Tom | — | Nay |
| Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Gilmore | — | Nay |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Gaines | — | Nay |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Duvall | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Nay |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Block | — | Not Voting |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Nay |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Nay |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 15 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 27% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (22)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Nay |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 13% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (8)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Gaines | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 395 do?
- Under existing law, the Director of Industrial Relations is the Administrator of Apprenticeship and is authorized to appoint assistants necessary to effectuate the purposes of state law governing apprenticeships. Existing law requires, with certain exceptions, that all workers employed on public works be paid not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed and establishes prevailing wage requirements with regard to holiday and overtime work. Existing law requires that every apprentice employed on public works projects be paid the prevailing rate of per diem wages for apprentices in the trade for which he or she is registered and that employers who employ apprentices on public works projects comply with other specified provisions. Existing law exempts certain public works projects from the prevailing wage requirements applicable to workers if the awarding body contracting for public work initiates and enforces a labor compliance program that meets specific statutory and regulatory requirements and ensures compliance with prevailing rate wage laws. Existing law requires that all labor compliance programs obtain the approval of the director. This bill would provide that an awarding body that implements an approved labor compliance program may, upon mutual agreement with the Chief of the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and at his or her discretion, assist the director in the enforcement of prevailing rate wage laws and other requirements that apply to apprenticeships in public works projects through the operation of that approved labor compliance program under terms and conditions prescribed by the Chief of the Division of Apprenticeship Standards. The bill would allow a contractor to appeal the result of a labor compliance program enforcement action related to apprenticeships in public works projects through specified procedures. The bill would provide that, if the involvement of the Chief of the Division of Apprenticeship Standards in a labor compliance program enforcement action is limited to a review of an assessment and the matter is resolved without litigation, the awarding body that has implemented the labor compliance program shall enforce any applicable penalties and shall deposit any penalties and forfeitures collected in its general fund.
- Who sponsors AB 395?
- AB 395 is sponsored by Fuentes.
- What is the current status of AB 395?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 23, 2009. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 395?
- Track AB 395 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 395
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 395
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →