Civil actions: disabled access.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 209 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 209.
You're tracking SB 209
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 209 — Civil actions: disabled access.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 569, Statutes of 2009.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law requires a court, with respect to an action involving a construction-related accessibility claim, to issue an order that, among other things, grants a 90-day stay of the proceedings with respect to that claim, schedules an early evaluation conference, and directs the defendant to file with the court under seal and serve on the plaintiff a copy of any relevant Certified Access Specialist inspection report, which shall be subject to a protective court order, as specified, if the defendant has satisfied certain requirements relating to inspection of the site at issue. Existing law requires the early evaluation conferences be conducted by a superior court judge or commissioner, or a court early evaluation conference officer, as defined. This bill would instead require the Certified Access Specialist inspection report to remain confidential and would allow disclosure only to the parties to the action, the parties' attorneys, and others involved in the evaluation and settlement of the case, as specified. The bill would also require the report to remain confidential until the conclusion of the claim, unless there is a showing of good cause by any party. This bill would make conforming and related technical changes.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/11/09 - Chaptered Current pdf October 11, 2009
- Enrolled 08/18/09 - Enrolled pdf August 18, 2009
- Amended 07/02/09 - Amended Assembly pdf July 02, 2009
- Amended 06/03/09 - Amended Assembly pdf June 03, 2009
- Introduced 02/23/09 - Introduced pdf February 23, 2009
- SB209 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 569, Statutes of 2009.
-
Approved by Governor.
-
Enrolled. To Governor at 11 a.m.
-
Ordered held in Engrossing and Enrolling.
-
Returned by the Governor at the request of the Senate.
-
Enrolled. To Governor at 1 p.m.
-
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 1841.) To enrollment.
-
To Special Consent Calendar.
-
In Senate. To unfinished business.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 74. Noes 0. Page 2448.) To Senate.
-
Read second time. To Consent Calendar.
-
Read second time. Amended. To second reading.
-
(Heard in committee on June 23.)
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.)
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
To Com. on JUD.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 451.) To Assembly.
-
Read second time. To Consent Calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 383.)
-
Set for hearing March 31.
-
To Com. on JUD.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 26.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Corbett · Primary
- Harman · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Corbett
Co-sponsors (1)
- Harman
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 33 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 36 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 0% | 0% | 12% |
How each member voted (41)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Not Voting |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Not Voting |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Not Voting |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Not Voting |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 81 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 85 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 93% | 0% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Not Voting |
| Charles | — | Not Voting |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Not Voting |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Not Voting |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 33 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 37 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 93% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Not Voting |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Not Voting |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 209 do?
- Existing law requires a court, with respect to an action involving a construction-related accessibility claim, to issue an order that, among other things, grants a 90-day stay of the proceedings with respect to that claim, schedules an early evaluation conference, and directs the defendant to file with the court under seal and serve on the plaintiff a copy of any relevant Certified Access Specialist inspection report, which shall be subject to a protective court order, as specified, if the defendant has satisfied certain requirements relating to inspection of the site at issue. Existing law requires the early evaluation conferences be conducted by a superior court judge or commissioner, or a court early evaluation conference officer, as defined. This bill would instead require the Certified Access Specialist inspection report to remain confidential and would allow disclosure only to the parties to the action, the parties' attorneys, and others involved in the evaluation and settlement of the case, as specified. The bill would also require the report to remain confidential until the conclusion of the claim, unless there is a showing of good cause by any party. This bill would make conforming and related technical changes.
- Who sponsors SB 209?
- SB 209 is sponsored by Corbett and Harman.
- What is the current status of SB 209?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 209?
- Track SB 209 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 209
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 209
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →