California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: To Executive

SB 209 — Civil actions: disabled access.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 569, Statutes of 2009.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law requires a court, with respect to an action involving a construction-related accessibility claim, to issue an order that, among other things, grants a 90-day stay of the proceedings with respect to that claim, schedules an early evaluation conference, and directs the defendant to file with the court under seal and serve on the plaintiff a copy of any relevant Certified Access Specialist inspection report, which shall be subject to a protective court order, as specified, if the defendant has satisfied certain requirements relating to inspection of the site at issue. Existing law requires the early evaluation conferences be conducted by a superior court judge or commissioner, or a court early evaluation conference officer, as defined. This bill would instead require the Certified Access Specialist inspection report to remain confidential and would allow disclosure only to the parties to the action, the parties' attorneys, and others involved in the evaluation and settlement of the case, as specified. The bill would also require the report to remain confidential until the conclusion of the claim, unless there is a showing of good cause by any party. This bill would make conforming and related technical changes.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 569, Statutes of 2009.

  2. Approved by Governor.

  3. Enrolled. To Governor at 11 a.m.

  4. Ordered held in Engrossing and Enrolling.

  5. Returned by the Governor at the request of the Senate.

  6. Enrolled. To Governor at 1 p.m.

  7. Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 1841.) To enrollment.

  8. To Special Consent Calendar.

  9. In Senate. To unfinished business.

  10. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 74. Noes 0. Page 2448.) To Senate.

  11. Read second time. To Consent Calendar.

  12. Read second time. Amended. To second reading.

  13. (Heard in committee on June 23.)

  14. From committee: Do pass as amended. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.)

  15. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  16. To Com. on JUD.

  17. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  18. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 451.) To Assembly.

  19. Read second time. To Consent Calendar.

  20. From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 383.)

  21. Set for hearing March 31.

  22. To Com. on JUD.

  23. From print. May be acted upon on or after March 26.

  24. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Corbett · Primary
  • Harman · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Corbett

Co-sponsors (1)

  • Harman

Not signed on (120)

120 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 120 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 36 Yea · 0 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 33005
Democratic 2000
Republican 1000
Total 36005
% of votes cast 88%0%0%12%
How each member voted (41)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Cogdill — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Ducheny — Not Voting
Florez — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Hollingsworth — Yea
Huff — Yea
Liu — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Runner — Yea
Ashburn — Yea
Benoit — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Oropeza — Not Voting
Price — Yea
Romero — Not Voting
Steinberg — Yea
Wiggins — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Not Voting
Aanestad — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Harman — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Maldonado — Not Voting
Pavley — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Walters — Yea
Correa — Yea
Cox — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 85 Yea · 0 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 81004
Democratic 2001
Republican 2001
Total 85006
% of votes cast 93%0%0%7%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
Hagman — Yea
Coto — Yea
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cook — Yea
Bill — Yea
Tom — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Beall — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Audra — Yea
Duvall — Not Voting
Charles — Not Voting
Evans — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Bass — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Gilmore — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Krekorian — Not Voting
Lieu — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nava — Not Voting
Ruskin — Yea
Silva — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Villines — Yea
Adams — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Huber — Yea
Knight — Yea
Logue — Yea
Ma — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Tran — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Eng — Yea
Davis — Yea
DeVore — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Jones, Brian W. Republican Not Voting
Niello, Roger W. Republican Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 10 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 1000
Unaffiliated 9000
Total 10000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (10)
Member Party Vote
Evans — Yea
Knight — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Silva — Yea
Tran — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Krekorian — Yea
Monning — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 37 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 33003
Democratic 3000
Republican 1000
Total 37003
% of votes cast 93%0%0%8%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Cogdill — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Huff — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Romero — Yea
Runner — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Cedillo — Not Voting
Harman — Not Voting
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wiggins — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Aanestad — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Ashburn — Yea
Benoit — Yea
Hollingsworth — Yea
Liu — Yea
Maldonado — Yea
Wright — Yea
Correa — Not Voting
Cox — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Yea
Florez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 209 do?
Existing law requires a court, with respect to an action involving a construction-related accessibility claim, to issue an order that, among other things, grants a 90-day stay of the proceedings with respect to that claim, schedules an early evaluation conference, and directs the defendant to file with the court under seal and serve on the plaintiff a copy of any relevant Certified Access Specialist inspection report, which shall be subject to a protective court order, as specified, if the defendant has satisfied certain requirements relating to inspection of the site at issue. Existing law requires the early evaluation conferences be conducted by a superior court judge or commissioner, or a court early evaluation conference officer, as defined. This bill would instead require the Certified Access Specialist inspection report to remain confidential and would allow disclosure only to the parties to the action, the parties' attorneys, and others involved in the evaluation and settlement of the case, as specified. The bill would also require the report to remain confidential until the conclusion of the claim, unless there is a showing of good cause by any party. This bill would make conforming and related technical changes.
Who sponsors SB 209?
SB 209 is sponsored by Corbett and Harman.
What is the current status of SB 209?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 209?
Track SB 209 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 209

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 209

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →