General obligation bonds.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 826 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 826.
You're tracking SB 826
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 826 — General obligation bonds.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 205, Statutes of 2009.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
(1) The State General Obligation Bond Law generally provides for a procedure that may be adopted by other acts, with any necessary modifications, in authorizing the issuance and sale of state general obligation bonds and providing for the repayment of those bonds, including the determination of interest rates the bonds shall bear. Existing law requires, with regard to a resolution specifying that the bonds may pay a variable interest rate, that the aggregate principal amount of all state general obligation bonds bearing variable interest rates does not exceed 20 percent of the aggregate principal amount of all outstanding general obligation bonds. Existing law exempts, from this calculation, variable rate bonds that have an effective fixed interest rate through a hedging contract. This bill would require the Treasurer to determine, with regard to those bonds that have an effective fixed interest rate through a hedging contract, that the hedging contract either significantly reduces variable rate risk or qualifies for integration with the bonds in calculating the yield on the bonds under certain federal rules. (2) Existing law provides that certain amounts payable or contractual obligations regarding bonds that bear a variable interest rate under a bond act that was approved by the voters before July 1, 2002, are not backed by the full faith and credit of the state. Existing law specifies that this contractual obligation is under a standby bond purchase agreement or other liquidity facility. This bill would instead provide that this contractual obligation is to repay advances and pay interest thereon under a credit enhancement or liquidity agreement. The bill would also provide that those amounts payable or those contractual obligations are backed by the full faith and credit of the state, if the bond act was approved on or after January 1, 2002. (3) Existing law requires, for bonds approved by the voters after January 1, 2006, that the payment of interest include the payment of any amounts owed by a counterparty after any offset for payments owed to the state on a hedging contract, and prohibits the total payments of stated interest on the bonds and payments owed by the state from exceeding a specified maximum rate after a specified offset. This bill would instead provide that the payment of any amounts owed by the state, after any offset, shall be deemed to be included within the appropriation for interest on the bonds. The bill would allow the payments of interest on a bond and the payments on a hedging contract that exceed the maximum rate in a fiscal year to be paid in subsequent fiscal years, under specified conditions. (4) Existing law requires, when the finance committee created by the bond act determines to issue commercial paper notes, for purposes of determining the principal amount of outstanding bonds, that the principal amount deemed outstanding be the maximum amount authorized in the resolution. This bill would delete that condition. (5) Existing law authorizes the Treasurer, when the finance committee created by the bond act deems it in the best interests of the state, to issue notes, on a negotiated or a competitive-bid basis, maturing within a period not to exceed 2 years, in anticipation of the sale of bonds. This bill would increase the maturation date of those notes to 5 years and make related changes. (6) Existing law specifies the manner in which the Treasurer may sell bonds. This bill would revise these provisions regarding the competitive sale of bonds and the conditions for bidding in a competitive sale or purchasing in a negotiated sale. The bill would make other conforming and nonsubstantive changes to the bond law. (7) Existing law allows a finance committee to also provide for the issuance and sale or exchange of refunding bonds for the purpose of redeeming, retiring, or purchasing for retirement, outstanding bonds at or before their maturity, if the committee determines, among other things, that refunding is necessary or advisable to effect a saving in debt service cost to the state. This bill would require the committee, when making this determination, to include, as interest on a refunded bond, the interest, if any, that will result from a related hedging contract and would authorize the committee, when determining debt service savings, to base the interest of a refunding bond upon the effective fixed interest rate under a hedging contract.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/11/09 - Chaptered Current pdf October 11, 2009
- Enrolled 09/04/09 - Enrolled pdf September 04, 2009
- Amended 05/13/09 - Amended Senate pdf May 13, 2009
- Introduced 03/19/09 - Introduced pdf March 19, 2009
- SB826 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 205, Statutes of 2009.
-
Approved by Governor.
-
Enrolled. To Governor at 9 p.m.
-
In Senate. To enrollment.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 76. Noes 2. Page 2852.) To Senate.
-
From Consent Calendar to third reading.
-
Read second time. To Consent Calendar.
-
(Heard in committee on July 8.)
-
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.)
-
(Heard in committee on June 29.)
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
To Com. on B. & F.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 1148.) To Assembly.
-
To Special Consent Calendar.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 0. Page 1027.)
-
(For vote only.)
-
Set for hearing May 26.
-
Set, first hearing. Testimony taken. Further hearing to be set.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing May 18.
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0. Page 682.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing April 28.
-
To Com. on G.O.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after April 19.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Committee on Governmental Organization · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Committee on Governmental Organization
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 82 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 88 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 2% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Not Voting |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 18 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 20 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (21)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Not Voting |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 37 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 826 do?
- (1) The State General Obligation Bond Law generally provides for a procedure that may be adopted by other acts, with any necessary modifications, in authorizing the issuance and sale of state general obligation bonds and providing for the repayment of those bonds, including the determination of interest rates the bonds shall bear. Existing law requires, with regard to a resolution specifying that the bonds may pay a variable interest rate, that the aggregate principal amount of all state general obligation bonds bearing variable interest rates does not exceed 20 percent of the aggregate principal amount of all outstanding general obligation bonds. Existing law exempts, from this calculation, variable rate bonds that have an effective fixed interest rate through a hedging contract. This bill would require the Treasurer to determine, with regard to those bonds that have an effective fixed interest rate through a hedging contract, that the hedging contract either significantly reduces variable rate risk or qualifies for integration with the bonds in calculating the yield on the bonds under certain federal rules. (2) Existing law provides that certain amounts payable or contractual obligations regarding bonds that bear a variable interest rate under a bond act that was approved by the voters before July 1, 2002, are not backed by the full faith and credit of the state. Existing law specifies that this contractual obligation is under a standby bond purchase agreement or other liquidity facility. This bill would instead provide that this contractual obligation is to repay advances and pay interest thereon under a credit enhancement or liquidity agreement. The bill would also provide that those amounts payable or those contractual obligations are backed by the full faith and credit of the state, if the bond act was approved on or after January 1, 2002. (3) Existing law requires, for bonds approved by the voters after January 1, 2006, that the payment of interest include the payment of any amounts owed by a counterparty after any offset for payments owed to the state on a hedging contract, and prohibits the total payments of stated interest on the bonds and payments owed by the state from exceeding a specified maximum rate after a specified offset. This bill would instead provide that the payment of any amounts owed by the state, after any offset, shall be deemed to be included within the appropriation for interest on the bonds. The bill would allow the payments of interest on a bond and the payments on a hedging contract that exceed the maximum rate in a fiscal year to be paid in subsequent fiscal years, under specified conditions. (4) Existing law requires, when the finance committee created by the bond act determines to issue commercial paper notes, for purposes of determining the principal amount of outstanding bonds, that the principal amount deemed outstanding be the maximum amount authorized in the resolution. This bill would delete that condition. (5) Existing law authorizes the Treasurer, when the finance committee created by the bond act deems it in the best interests of the state, to issue notes, on a negotiated or a competitive-bid basis, maturing within a period not to exceed 2 years, in anticipation of the sale of bonds. This bill would increase the maturation date of those notes to 5 years and make related changes. (6) Existing law specifies the manner in which the Treasurer may sell bonds. This bill would revise these provisions regarding the competitive sale of bonds and the conditions for bidding in a competitive sale or purchasing in a negotiated sale. The bill would make other conforming and nonsubstantive changes to the bond law. (7) Existing law allows a finance committee to also provide for the issuance and sale or exchange of refunding bonds for the purpose of redeeming, retiring, or purchasing for retirement, outstanding bonds at or before their maturity, if the committee determines, among other things, that refunding is necessary or advisable to effect a saving in debt service cost to the state. This bill would require the committee, when making this determination, to include, as interest on a refunded bond, the interest, if any, that will result from a related hedging contract and would authorize the committee, when determining debt service savings, to base the interest of a refunding bond upon the effective fixed interest rate under a hedging contract.
- Who sponsors SB 826?
- SB 826 is sponsored by Committee on Governmental Organization.
- What is the current status of SB 826?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 826?
- Track SB 826 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 826
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 826
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →