Correctional facilities: wireless communication devices.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 434 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 434.
You're tracking SB 434
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 434 — Correctional facilities: wireless communication devices.
Last action — From Assembly without further action.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law establishes various offenses relating to the unauthorized provision of specified items to persons confined in local and state correctional facilities. This bill would provide, subject to exceptions, that any inmate or ward who possesses any cellular telephone or other wireless communication device or any component thereof, including, but not limited to, a subscriber identity module (SIM card) or memory storage device, or any person who possesses with the intent to deliver, or delivers, to an inmate or ward in the custody of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation any cellular telephone or other wireless communication device or any component thereof, including, but not limited to, a subscriber identity module (SIM card) or memory storage device, is guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine not exceeding $5,000. The bill would also provide that if a person visiting an inmate or ward is found to be in possession of a cellular telephone or other wireless communication device or any component thereof, including, but not limited to, a subscriber identity module (SIM card) or memory storage device, when searched or subjected to a metal detector, as specified, that cellular telephone or wireless communication device or component shall be subject to confiscation. The bill would require posted notices regarding those search and confiscation provisions, as specified. By creating a new crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Amended 01/25/10 - Amended Assembly Current pdf January 25, 2010
- Amended 06/23/09 - Amended Assembly pdf June 23, 2009
- Amended 06/08/09 - Amended Assembly pdf June 08, 2009
- Amended 04/22/09 - Amended Senate pdf April 22, 2009
- Amended 04/02/09 - Amended Senate pdf April 02, 2009
- Introduced 02/26/09 - Introduced pdf February 26, 2009
- SB434 View text html
Action History
-
From Assembly without further action.
-
From committee without further action.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
(Heard in committee on June 16.)
-
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.)
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
To Com. on PUB. S.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 797.) To Assembly.
-
To Special Consent Calendar.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing April 27.
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 480.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
Set for hearing April 14.
-
To Com. on PUB. S.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 28.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Florez · Cosponsor
- Gilmore · Cosponsor
- Harman · Primary
- Huff · Cosponsor
- Leno · Cosponsor
- Stephen C. Padilla · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 5 co-sponsors · 116 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Harman
Co-sponsors (5)
- Florez
- Gilmore
- Huff
- Leno
- Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic
Not signed on (116)
116 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 116 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Not Voting |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 32 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 36 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 0% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Not Voting |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Not Voting |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Not Voting |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 434 do?
- Existing law establishes various offenses relating to the unauthorized provision of specified items to persons confined in local and state correctional facilities. This bill would provide, subject to exceptions, that any inmate or ward who possesses any cellular telephone or other wireless communication device or any component thereof, including, but not limited to, a subscriber identity module (SIM card) or memory storage device, or any person who possesses with the intent to deliver, or delivers, to an inmate or ward in the custody of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation any cellular telephone or other wireless communication device or any component thereof, including, but not limited to, a subscriber identity module (SIM card) or memory storage device, is guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine not exceeding $5,000. The bill would also provide that if a person visiting an inmate or ward is found to be in possession of a cellular telephone or other wireless communication device or any component thereof, including, but not limited to, a subscriber identity module (SIM card) or memory storage device, when searched or subjected to a metal detector, as specified, that cellular telephone or wireless communication device or component shall be subject to confiscation. The bill would require posted notices regarding those search and confiscation provisions, as specified. By creating a new crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors SB 434?
- SB 434 is sponsored by Florez, Gilmore, Harman, Huff, Leno, and Padilla, Stephen C. (Democratic).
- What is the current status of SB 434?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 434?
- Track SB 434 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 434
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 434
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →