Electricity: resource adequacy distributed generation program.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1536 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1536.
You're tracking AB 1536
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1536 — Electricity: resource adequacy distributed generation program.
Last action — From Senate committee without further action.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
(1) Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations, as defined. Existing law requires the commission, in consultation with the Independent System Operator (ISO) , to establish resource adequacy requirements for all load-serving entities, as defined, in accordance with specified objectives. This definition of a "load-serving entity" excludes a local publicly owned electric utility. However, other provisions of existing law require that each local publicly owned electric utility serving end-use customers prudently plan for and procure resources that are adequate to meet its planning reserve margin and peak demand and operating reserves, sufficient to provide reliable electric service to its customers. This bill would authorize an eligible customer-generator, as defined, to participate in resource adequacy distributed generation, as specified. The bill would require each responsible load-serving entity, as defined, to develop a standard offer contract for the purchase of electricity generated by an eligible facility, as defined, of an eligible customer-generator participating in resource adequacy distributed generation, and would require that the standard offer contract provide for payment for every kilowatthour delivered to the electrical grid by the eligible facility at the generation rate of the responsible load-serving entity. The bill would require that the commission approve, or approve as modified, the standard offer contract of a responsible load-serving entity that is an electrical corporation, electric service provider, or community choice aggregator, and would similarly require that the governing board approve, or approve as modified, the standard offer contract of a responsible load-serving entity that is a local publicly owned electric utility. The bill would authorize an electrical corporation or local publicly owned electric utility to offer resource adequacy distributed generation pursuant to a tariff, and would authorize the tariff to be offered in lieu of, or in addition to, the standard offer contract. The bill would require every responsible load-serving entity, upon approval of its standard offer contract or tariff, to make the standard offer contract or tariff available to eligible customer-generators within its service territory, or for an electric service provider, to any eligible customer-generator with which it has entered into a direct transaction. The bill would impose additional requirements upon responsible load-serving entities, the commission, and the governing board of a local publicly owned electric utility for implementation of the resource adequacy distributed generation program. The bill would provide that the physical generating capacity of the eligible facility available to the responsible load-serving entity pursuant to the program shall count toward the resource adequacy requirements of those entities. (2) Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act or of any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime. Because the provisions of this bill would require action by the commission to implement, a violation of these provisions would impose a state-mandated local program by creating a new crime. Because this bill would establish various requirements to be met by local publicly owned utilities, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for specified reasons.
Bill Text
- Amended 06/03/10 - Amended Senate Current pdf June 03, 2010
- Amended 12/17/09 - Amended Senate pdf December 17, 2009
- Amended 10/14/09 - Amended Senate pdf October 14, 2009
- Amended 09/10/09 - Amended Senate pdf September 10, 2009
- Amended 09/08/09 - Amended Senate pdf September 08, 2009
- Amended 09/02/09 - Amended Senate pdf September 02, 2009
- Amended 06/23/09 - Amended Senate pdf June 23, 2009
- Amended 05/06/09 - Amended Assembly pdf May 06, 2009
- Amended 04/14/09 - Amended Assembly pdf April 14, 2009
- Introduced 02/27/09 - Introduced pdf February 27, 2009
- AB1536 View text html
Action History
-
From Senate committee without further action.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
-
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Re-referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
(Page 2527.)
-
Senate Rule 29.3 suspended.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
(Ayes 23. Noes 14. Page 2280.)
-
Senate Rule 29.3 suspended.
-
Withdrawn from committee. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 1754.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (May 20).
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (April 27).
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Re-referred. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (April 20).
-
Re-referred to Com. on U. & C.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on U. & C. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Coms. on U. & C. and NAT. RES.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.
-
Introduced. To print.
Sponsors
- Blakeslee · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Blakeslee
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 83 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 91 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 99% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (92)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Not Voting |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 18 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 20 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (21)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Not Voting |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 6 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 20% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| De | — | Nay |
| Leon | — | Nay |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Not Voting |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Not Voting |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (18)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Berryhill | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1536 do?
- (1) Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations, as defined. Existing law requires the commission, in consultation with the Independent System Operator (ISO) , to establish resource adequacy requirements for all load-serving entities, as defined, in accordance with specified objectives. This definition of a "load-serving entity" excludes a local publicly owned electric utility. However, other provisions of existing law require that each local publicly owned electric utility serving end-use customers prudently plan for and procure resources that are adequate to meet its planning reserve margin and peak demand and operating reserves, sufficient to provide reliable electric service to its customers. This bill would authorize an eligible customer-generator, as defined, to participate in resource adequacy distributed generation, as specified. The bill would require each responsible load-serving entity, as defined, to develop a standard offer contract for the purchase of electricity generated by an eligible facility, as defined, of an eligible customer-generator participating in resource adequacy distributed generation, and would require that the standard offer contract provide for payment for every kilowatthour delivered to the electrical grid by the eligible facility at the generation rate of the responsible load-serving entity. The bill would require that the commission approve, or approve as modified, the standard offer contract of a responsible load-serving entity that is an electrical corporation, electric service provider, or community choice aggregator, and would similarly require that the governing board approve, or approve as modified, the standard offer contract of a responsible load-serving entity that is a local publicly owned electric utility. The bill would authorize an electrical corporation or local publicly owned electric utility to offer resource adequacy distributed generation pursuant to a tariff, and would authorize the tariff to be offered in lieu of, or in addition to, the standard offer contract. The bill would require every responsible load-serving entity, upon approval of its standard offer contract or tariff, to make the standard offer contract or tariff available to eligible customer-generators within its service territory, or for an electric service provider, to any eligible customer-generator with which it has entered into a direct transaction. The bill would impose additional requirements upon responsible load-serving entities, the commission, and the governing board of a local publicly owned electric utility for implementation of the resource adequacy distributed generation program. The bill would provide that the physical generating capacity of the eligible facility available to the responsible load-serving entity pursuant to the program shall count toward the resource adequacy requirements of those entities. (2) Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act or of any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime. Because the provisions of this bill would require action by the commission to implement, a violation of these provisions would impose a state-mandated local program by creating a new crime. Because this bill would establish various requirements to be met by local publicly owned utilities, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for specified reasons.
- Who sponsors AB 1536?
- AB 1536 is sponsored by Blakeslee.
- What is the current status of AB 1536?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1536?
- Track AB 1536 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1536
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1536
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →