California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: Enacted 2 D cosponsors

AB 2058 — Unemployment insurance: retraining benefits.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 591, Statutes of 2010.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 18, 2010. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 82% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 11 sponsors

    1 primary, 10 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 8 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law provides unemployment compensation benefits to eligible persons who are unemployed through no fault of their own. Existing law, until January 1, 2015, provides for retraining benefits to eligible individuals pursuant to the federal Trade Act of 1974, as amended by the federal Trade Act of 2002. Existing law authorizes an unemployed individual who files a claim for unemployment compensation benefits or extended duration benefits, or an application for federal-state extended benefits or any federally funded unemployment compensation benefits, to apply to the Employment Development Department for benefits during a period of training or retraining. Existing law also requires that a determination of potential eligibility for specified training and retraining benefits be issued to an unemployed individual if the Director of Employment Development finds that specified conditions apply. This bill would establish the California Training Benefits Program, which, among other things, would revise those eligibility requirements to, instead, specify that an unemployed individual who qualifies for unemployment compensation benefits, extended duration benefits, or federal-state extended benefits or any federally funded unemployment compensation benefits, and applies for the program shall be deemed to automatically be eligible for the program during a period of training or retraining. Existing law requires that a determination of potential eligibility for training or retraining benefits be issued to an unemployed individual if the director makes a specified finding. This bill would, instead, require that a determination of automatic eligibility for training or retraining be issued to an unemployed individual if any of specified conditions apply. The bill would also require that, if training or retraining is not authorized under those provisions governing automatic eligibility for those benefits, a determination of potential eligibility for benefits be issued to the unemployed individual if the director finds that specified criteria apply. Existing law requires the department to inform all individuals who claim unemployment compensation benefits in this state of the benefits potentially available, and permits the department to convey this information verbally or in written form, as provided. This bill would, instead, require the department to convey that information verbally, in written form, or online, and would require that the information be made available on the department's Internet Web site in close proximity to information on unemployment compensation claim forms. This bill would provide that these changes are effective on January 1, 2011, unless the department determines that implementation by that date is not feasible, in which case it would require the department to implement the changes no later than July 1, 2011. Because the bill would make various changes to existing eligibility requirements for training and retraining benefits, which would result in additional amounts being payable from the Unemployment Fund for those benefits, the bill would make an appropriation. The bill would require the department, not later than September 1, 2016, to prepare and submit to the Governor and the Legislature a report evaluating the effectiveness of the program, containing data and information as prescribed.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 591, Statutes of 2010.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and to the Governor at 4:20 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 61. Noes 16. Page 6730.)

  5. Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Ayes 49. Noes 27. Page 6645.)

  6. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 26 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  7. Read third time, passed, and to Assembly. (Ayes 24. Noes 8. Page 4712.)

  8. Read second time. To third reading.

  9. Read third time, amended. To second reading.

  10. Read second time. To third reading.

  11. Received August 13 pursuant to Joint Rule 61(b)(14)

  12. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 4.) (August 12).

  13. In committee: Placed on APPR suspense file.

  14. From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (June 23).

  15. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on L. & I.R.

  16. Referred to Com. on L. & I.R.

  17. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  18. Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 58. Noes 19. Page 5558.)

  19. Assembly Rule 69(d) suspended. (Page 5549.)

  20. Read third time, amended, and returned to third reading. (Page 5447.).

  21. Read second time. To third reading.

  22. Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.

  23. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 28).

  24. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  25. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  26. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.

  27. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  28. Read second time and amended.

  29. From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 4.) (March 24).

  30. Referred to Com. on INS.

  31. From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.

  32. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Josh Lowenthal · Cosponsor
  • Beall · Cosponsor
  • Block · Primary
  • Blumenfield · Cosponsor
  • Negrete McLeod · Cosponsor
  • Correa · Cosponsor
  • DeSaulnier · Cosponsor
  • Hayashi · Cosponsor
  • Solorio · Cosponsor
  • Torrico · Cosponsor
  • Joaquin Arambula · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 10 co-sponsors · 111 not signed on · 4 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Block

Co-sponsors (10)

Not signed on (111)

111 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 111 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 71 Yea · 18 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 661701
Democratic 3000
Republican 2100
Total 711801
% of votes cast 79%20%0%1%
How each member voted (90)
Member Party Vote
Carter — Yea
Eng — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Cook — Yea
Tom — Yea
Charles — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bass — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Conway — Nay
DeVore — Nay
Bill — Nay
Fletcher — Nay
Audra — Nay
Feuer — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Furutani — Yea
Garrick — Nay
Gilmore — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Huber — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Knight — Nay
Lieu — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Nay
Monning — Yea
Nava — Yea
Norby — Not Voting
Ruskin — Yea
Silva — Nay
Smyth — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Tran — Yea
Villines — Yea
Adams — Nay
Anderson — Nay
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Hill — Yea
Jeffries — Nay
Logue — Nay
Ma — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Coto — Yea
Evans — Yea
Davis — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 25 Yea · 8 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 23706
Democratic 2000
Republican 0100
Total 25806
% of votes cast 64%21%0%15%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Florez — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Leno — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Runner — Nay
Cogdill — Not Voting
Hollingsworth — Nay
Price — Yea
Romero — Yea
Dutton — Nay
Steinberg — Yea
Wiggins — Not Voting
Wolk — Yea
Aanestad — Nay
Alquist — Yea
Ashburn — Nay
Harman — Not Voting
Huff — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Liu — Yea
Oropeza — Not Voting
Simitian — Yea
Walters — Not Voting
Wright — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Emmerson — Nay
Correa — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Not Voting
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 7 Yea · 4 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7400
Total 7400
% of votes cast 64%36%0%0%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Price — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Ashburn — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Walters — Nay
Corbett — Yea
Emmerson — Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 8 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 8002
Total 8002
% of votes cast 80%0%0%20%
How each member voted (10)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Not Voting
Corbett — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Walters — Yea
Alquist — Not Voting
Price — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Emmerson — Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 67 Yea · 20 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 622003
Democratic 3000
Republican 2001
Total 672004
% of votes cast 74%22%0%4%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Cook — Yea
Eng — Yea
Evans — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Charles — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Hall — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Beall — Yea
Coto — Yea
Davis — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huber — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Ma — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Saldana — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Bill — Nay
Fletcher — Nay
Tom — Not Voting
Audra — Not Voting
Conway — Nay
Fuller — Nay
Garrick — Nay
Harkey — Nay
Jeffries — Nay
Knight — Nay
Anderson — Nay
Miller — Nay
Norby — Nay
Silva — Nay
Smyth — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Tran — Nay
Adams — Nay
Ammiano — Yea
Bass — Yea
Blakeslee — Nay
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Logue — Nay
Monning — Yea
Nava — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Torres — Yea
Villines — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
DeVore — Nay
Yamada — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Gilmore — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 13 Yea · 5 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 12500
Democratic 1000
Total 13500
% of votes cast 72%28%0%0%
How each member voted (18)
Member Party Vote
Fuentes — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Charles — Yea
Miller — Nay
Ammiano — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Norby — Nay
Ruskin — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Conway — Nay
Coto — Yea
Davis — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 9 Yea · 4 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 2000
Unaffiliated 7300
Republican 0100
Total 9400
% of votes cast 69%31%0%0%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Charles — Yea
Salas — Yea
Carter — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Hagman — Nay
Hayashi — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Blakeslee — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Torres — Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 2058 do?
Existing law provides unemployment compensation benefits to eligible persons who are unemployed through no fault of their own. Existing law, until January 1, 2015, provides for retraining benefits to eligible individuals pursuant to the federal Trade Act of 1974, as amended by the federal Trade Act of 2002. Existing law authorizes an unemployed individual who files a claim for unemployment compensation benefits or extended duration benefits, or an application for federal-state extended benefits or any federally funded unemployment compensation benefits, to apply to the Employment Development Department for benefits during a period of training or retraining. Existing law also requires that a determination of potential eligibility for specified training and retraining benefits be issued to an unemployed individual if the Director of Employment Development finds that specified conditions apply. This bill would establish the California Training Benefits Program, which, among other things, would revise those eligibility requirements to, instead, specify that an unemployed individual who qualifies for unemployment compensation benefits, extended duration benefits, or federal-state extended benefits or any federally funded unemployment compensation benefits, and applies for the program shall be deemed to automatically be eligible for the program during a period of training or retraining. Existing law requires that a determination of potential eligibility for training or retraining benefits be issued to an unemployed individual if the director makes a specified finding. This bill would, instead, require that a determination of automatic eligibility for training or retraining be issued to an unemployed individual if any of specified conditions apply. The bill would also require that, if training or retraining is not authorized under those provisions governing automatic eligibility for those benefits, a determination of potential eligibility for benefits be issued to the unemployed individual if the director finds that specified criteria apply. Existing law requires the department to inform all individuals who claim unemployment compensation benefits in this state of the benefits potentially available, and permits the department to convey this information verbally or in written form, as provided. This bill would, instead, require the department to convey that information verbally, in written form, or online, and would require that the information be made available on the department's Internet Web site in close proximity to information on unemployment compensation claim forms. This bill would provide that these changes are effective on January 1, 2011, unless the department determines that implementation by that date is not feasible, in which case it would require the department to implement the changes no later than July 1, 2011. Because the bill would make various changes to existing eligibility requirements for training and retraining benefits, which would result in additional amounts being payable from the Unemployment Fund for those benefits, the bill would make an appropriation. The bill would require the department, not later than September 1, 2016, to prepare and submit to the Governor and the Legislature a report evaluating the effectiveness of the program, containing data and information as prescribed.
Who sponsors AB 2058?
AB 2058 is sponsored by Lowenthal, Josh (Democratic), Beall, Block, Blumenfield, Negrete McLeod, Correa, DeSaulnier, Hayashi, Solorio, Torrico, and Arambula, Joaquin (Democratic).
What is the current status of AB 2058?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 18, 2010. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 2058?
Track AB 2058 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 2058

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 2058

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →