AB 1699 — Interim appropriations.
Last action — Read third time. Urgency clause refused adoption. (Ayes 23. Noes 10. Page 5116.)
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
(1) The California Constitution requires the Legislature to pass a budget bill by June 15 of each year for the fiscal year commencing on July 1. Existing law provides that no state officer or employee shall be deemed to have a break in service or to have terminated his or her employment, for any purpose, or to have incurred any change in his or her authority, status, or jurisdiction or in his or her salary or other conditions of employment, solely because of the failure to enact a Budget Act for a fiscal year prior to the beginning of that fiscal year. Under the California Constitution, money may be drawn from the Treasury only through an appropriation made by law and upon a Controller's duly drawn warrant. This bill would continuously appropriate from the General Fund and other specified funds to the Controller an amount necessary for the payment of compensation and employee benefits to state employees, as defined, for work performed on or after July 1 of a fiscal year for which no budget has been enacted. This bill would specify, if a memorandum of understanding is in effect that has been approved by the Legislature, that the compensation and contribution for employee benefits for represented state employees be at a rate consistent with the memorandum of understanding and, for state employees excluded from collective bargaining, at the rate approved by the Department of Personnel Administration prior to the commencement of the fiscal year for which a Budget Act has not been enacted. The bill would require, if a memorandum of understanding is not in effect for represented state employees and the department has not approved a compensation package for state employees excluded from collective bargaining, that the compensation and contribution for employee benefits for represented state employees and state employees excluded from collective bargaining be at the rate in effect at the expiration of the last fiscal year for which a budget was enacted. (2) Existing law establishes standards for the use of personal services contracts. Existing law prohibits the use of state funds to reimburse a state contractor for any costs incurred to assist, promote, or deter union organizing. For the purposes of that provision, "state contractor" is defined as any employer that receives state funds for supplying goods or services pursuant to a written contract with the state or any of its agencies. This bill would continuously appropriate from the fund from which a state contractor received compensation in the prior fiscal year to the Controller the amount necessary for payment of contract obligations to a state contractor that provides goods or services to the state until the Budget Act of that fiscal year is enacted. The bill would provide that if payments are made to a contractor pursuant to that provision, the first payment shall be made on July 15, with payments to be made on the 15th of each month thereafter until enactment of the Budget Act. (3) Under existing law, the California Department of Aging administers the federal Older Americans Act in California. Pursuant to this federal act and the Mello-Granlund Older Californians Act, the department allocates federal funds, in accordance with prescribed funding formulas, to area agencies on aging in order to provide an array of services to seniors. This bill would continuously appropriate from the General Fund, unallocated special funds, federal funds, and any other fund from which area agencies on aging are compensated to the Controller the amount necessary for the payment of the amount necessary to pay area agencies on aging the sums necessary for the administration of programs under their jurisdiction, including both state and federal funds used for the provision of services and program administration. The bill would provide that if payments are made to area agencies on aging pursuant to that provision, the first payment would be made on July 15, with payments to be made on the 15th of each month thereafter until enactment of the Budget Act. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill Text
- Amended 08/31/10 - Amended Senate Current pdf August 31, 2010
- Amended 08/17/10 - Amended Senate pdf August 17, 2010
- Introduced 02/01/10 - Introduced pdf February 01, 2010
- AB1699 View text html
Action History
-
Read third time. Urgency clause refused adoption. (Ayes 23. Noes 10. Page 5116.)
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
(Ayes 23. Noes 11. Page 5072.)
-
Senate Rule 29.3(b) suspended.
-
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
Read third time, amended. To second reading.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (July 15).
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (June 23).
-
Referred to Com. on P.E. & R.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed and to Senate. (Ayes 54. Noes 19. Page 5569.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 28).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (April 7).
-
Referred to Com. on P.E.,R. & S.S.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 4.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Beall · Cosponsor
- Blumenfield · Cosponsor
- Jones · Cosponsor
- Portantino · Cosponsor
- Saldana · Cosponsor
- Eng · Cosponsor
- Furutani · Cosponsor
- Hernandez · Primary
- Hayashi · Cosponsor
- Lieu · Cosponsor
- Ma · Cosponsor
- Monning · Cosponsor
- Skinner · Cosponsor
- Torlakson · Cosponsor
- Torres · Cosponsor
- Torrico · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 15 co-sponsors · 106 not signed on · 3 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Hernandez
Co-sponsors (15)
- Beall
- Blumenfield
- Jones
- Portantino
- Saldana
- Eng
- Furutani
- Hayashi
- Lieu
- Ma
- Monning
- Skinner
- Torlakson
- Torres
- Torrico
Not signed on (106)
106 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 106 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 22 | 10 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 24 | 10 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 25% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Not Voting |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Nay |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Nay |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Nay |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Not Voting |
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 19 | 12 | 0 | 5 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 20 | 13 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 51% | 33% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Not Voting |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Harman | — | Nay |
| Cogdill | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Nay |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Not Voting |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Nay |
| Correa | — | Not Voting |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wiggins | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 6 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 10% | 0% | 30% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Not Voting |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Emmerson | — | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 17% | 0% | 17% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Not Voting |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 59 | 20 | 0 | 6 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 63 | 20 | 0 | 8 |
| % of votes cast | 69% | 22% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Nay |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Tom | — | Not Voting |
| Audra | — | Not Voting |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Not Voting |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Nay |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Not Voting |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Nay |
| Emmerson | — | Not Voting |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 72% | 28% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (18)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 17% | 0% | 17% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Not Voting |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1699 do?
- (1) The California Constitution requires the Legislature to pass a budget bill by June 15 of each year for the fiscal year commencing on July 1. Existing law provides that no state officer or employee shall be deemed to have a break in service or to have terminated his or her employment, for any purpose, or to have incurred any change in his or her authority, status, or jurisdiction or in his or her salary or other conditions of employment, solely because of the failure to enact a Budget Act for a fiscal year prior to the beginning of that fiscal year. Under the California Constitution, money may be drawn from the Treasury only through an appropriation made by law and upon a Controller's duly drawn warrant. This bill would continuously appropriate from the General Fund and other specified funds to the Controller an amount necessary for the payment of compensation and employee benefits to state employees, as defined, for work performed on or after July 1 of a fiscal year for which no budget has been enacted. This bill would specify, if a memorandum of understanding is in effect that has been approved by the Legislature, that the compensation and contribution for employee benefits for represented state employees be at a rate consistent with the memorandum of understanding and, for state employees excluded from collective bargaining, at the rate approved by the Department of Personnel Administration prior to the commencement of the fiscal year for which a Budget Act has not been enacted. The bill would require, if a memorandum of understanding is not in effect for represented state employees and the department has not approved a compensation package for state employees excluded from collective bargaining, that the compensation and contribution for employee benefits for represented state employees and state employees excluded from collective bargaining be at the rate in effect at the expiration of the last fiscal year for which a budget was enacted. (2) Existing law establishes standards for the use of personal services contracts. Existing law prohibits the use of state funds to reimburse a state contractor for any costs incurred to assist, promote, or deter union organizing. For the purposes of that provision, "state contractor" is defined as any employer that receives state funds for supplying goods or services pursuant to a written contract with the state or any of its agencies. This bill would continuously appropriate from the fund from which a state contractor received compensation in the prior fiscal year to the Controller the amount necessary for payment of contract obligations to a state contractor that provides goods or services to the state until the Budget Act of that fiscal year is enacted. The bill would provide that if payments are made to a contractor pursuant to that provision, the first payment shall be made on July 15, with payments to be made on the 15th of each month thereafter until enactment of the Budget Act. (3) Under existing law, the California Department of Aging administers the federal Older Americans Act in California. Pursuant to this federal act and the Mello-Granlund Older Californians Act, the department allocates federal funds, in accordance with prescribed funding formulas, to area agencies on aging in order to provide an array of services to seniors. This bill would continuously appropriate from the General Fund, unallocated special funds, federal funds, and any other fund from which area agencies on aging are compensated to the Controller the amount necessary for the payment of the amount necessary to pay area agencies on aging the sums necessary for the administration of programs under their jurisdiction, including both state and federal funds used for the provision of services and program administration. The bill would provide that if payments are made to area agencies on aging pursuant to that provision, the first payment would be made on July 15, with payments to be made on the 15th of each month thereafter until enactment of the Budget Act. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
- Who sponsors AB 1699?
- AB 1699 is sponsored by Beall, Blumenfield, Jones, Portantino, Saldana, Eng, Furutani, Hernandez, Hayashi, Lieu, Ma, Monning, Skinner, Torlakson, Torres, and Torrico.
- What is the current status of AB 1699?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1699?
- Track AB 1699 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1699
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1699
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →