Medi-Cal: proof of eligibility.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1142 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1142.
You're tracking AB 1142
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1142 — Medi-Cal: proof of eligibility.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 511, Statutes of 2009.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 27, 2009. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 8 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law establishes the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services and under which qualified low-income persons receive health care services. Existing law provides that it is the responsibility of the Medi-Cal beneficiary to provide information and evidence of Medi-Cal eligibility to that person's health care provider if that information is requested by the provider prior to rendering services to that beneficiary. Existing law provides that it is the responsibility of the provider prior to rendering Medi-Cal reimbursable services to persons presenting themselves as Medi-Cal beneficiaries to make a good faith effort to verify the person's identity, if the person is not known to the provider, otherwise payment for those services may later be disallowed by the department. This bill would provide, if a hospital obtains proof of Medi-Cal eligibility for a patient subsequent to the date of service, that it is the responsibility of a hospital to provide all information regarding that person's Medi-Cal eligibility to certain providers that bill separately for all services associated with the person's treatment in the hospital rendered during the same time period for which the hospital is submitting a claim, as specified. Existing law prohibits any provider of health care services who obtains a label or copy from the Medi-Cal card or other proof of eligibility from seeking reimbursement or attempting to obtain payment for the cost of the covered health care services from the eligible applicant or recipient, or any person other than the department or a 3rd-party payor who provides a contractual or legal entitlement to health care services. This bill would require a Medi-Cal provider, if the provider receives proof of a patient's Medi-Cal eligibility and has previously referred an unpaid bill for services rendered to the patient to a debt collector, to promptly notify the debt collector of the patient's Medi-Cal coverage, instruct the debt collector to cease collection efforts on the unpaid bill for covered services, and notify the patient accordingly. This bill would provide that a provider of health care services who obtains a label from, or copy of, the Medi-Cal card or other proof of eligibility and who subsequently pursues reimbursement or payment for the cost of covered services from the beneficiary or fails to cease collection efforts against the beneficiary for covered services, as prescribed, may be subject to a penalty, payable to the department, not to exceed 3 times the amount payable by the Medi-Cal program. The bill would also require that prescribed mitigating circumstances be considered when assessing the penalty. The bill would require that a provider have the right to appeal the assessed penalty, as specified. Existing law prohibits a person furnishing information on a specific transaction or experience to any consumer credit reporting agency if the person knows or should know the information is incomplete or inaccurate. This bill would provide that if a Medi-Cal provider or debt collector receives proof of Medi-Cal coverage for services rendered and then reports the services rendered to a consumer credit reporting agency or fails to provide corrections of, or instructions to delete, as appropriate, information regarding Medi-Cal covered services to a consumer reporting agency, the provider or debt collector shall be deemed to be in violation of the above-described provisions.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/11/09 - Chaptered Current pdf October 11, 2009
- Enrolled 09/16/09 - Enrolled pdf September 16, 2009
- Amended 09/03/09 - Amended Senate pdf September 03, 2009
- Amended 09/01/09 - Amended Senate pdf September 01, 2009
- Amended 08/17/09 - Amended Senate pdf August 17, 2009
- Amended 06/28/09 - Amended Senate pdf June 28, 2009
- Amended 04/28/09 - Amended Assembly pdf April 28, 2009
- Amended 04/14/09 - Amended Assembly pdf April 14, 2009
- Introduced 02/27/09 - Introduced pdf February 27, 2009
- AB1142 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 511, Statutes of 2009.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and to the Governor at 5 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 46. Noes 30. Page 3279.)
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Assembly. (Ayes 26. Noes 13. Page 2297.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
Read third time, amended. To second reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 8. Noes 5.) (August 27).
-
In committee: Placed on Appropriations suspense file.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
(Corrected August 17.)
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 3.) (June 24).
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 47. Noes 29. Page 1682.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 5.) (May 13).
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 13. Noes 4.) (April 21).
-
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.
-
Introduced. To print.
Sponsors
- Price · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Price
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 51 | 31 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 55 | 33 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 36% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (92)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Nay |
| Tom | — | Nay |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Chesbro | — | Not Voting |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Gilmore | — | Nay |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Tran | — | Nay |
| Villines | — | Nay |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Duvall | — | Not Voting |
| Adams | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Not Voting |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Nay |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 25 | 12 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 27 | 13 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 66% | 32% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (41)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Nay |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Nay |
| Hollingsworth | — | Nay |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Benoit | — | Nay |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Nay |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Not Voting |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 62% | 38% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Cox | — | Nay |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 75% | 25% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (12)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 50 | 30 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 56 | 32 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 61% | 35% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (92)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Not Voting |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Bill | — | Nay |
| Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Tom | — | Nay |
| Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Gaines | — | Nay |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Gilmore | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Not Voting |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Duvall | — | Nay |
| Adams | — | Nay |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Nay |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Nay |
| Villines | — | Nay |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Not Voting |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Not Voting |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Nay |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 14 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 15 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (21)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 17 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 19 | 5 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 19% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (26)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Fletcher | — | Not Voting |
| Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1142 do?
- Existing law establishes the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services and under which qualified low-income persons receive health care services. Existing law provides that it is the responsibility of the Medi-Cal beneficiary to provide information and evidence of Medi-Cal eligibility to that person's health care provider if that information is requested by the provider prior to rendering services to that beneficiary. Existing law provides that it is the responsibility of the provider prior to rendering Medi-Cal reimbursable services to persons presenting themselves as Medi-Cal beneficiaries to make a good faith effort to verify the person's identity, if the person is not known to the provider, otherwise payment for those services may later be disallowed by the department. This bill would provide, if a hospital obtains proof of Medi-Cal eligibility for a patient subsequent to the date of service, that it is the responsibility of a hospital to provide all information regarding that person's Medi-Cal eligibility to certain providers that bill separately for all services associated with the person's treatment in the hospital rendered during the same time period for which the hospital is submitting a claim, as specified. Existing law prohibits any provider of health care services who obtains a label or copy from the Medi-Cal card or other proof of eligibility from seeking reimbursement or attempting to obtain payment for the cost of the covered health care services from the eligible applicant or recipient, or any person other than the department or a 3rd-party payor who provides a contractual or legal entitlement to health care services. This bill would require a Medi-Cal provider, if the provider receives proof of a patient's Medi-Cal eligibility and has previously referred an unpaid bill for services rendered to the patient to a debt collector, to promptly notify the debt collector of the patient's Medi-Cal coverage, instruct the debt collector to cease collection efforts on the unpaid bill for covered services, and notify the patient accordingly. This bill would provide that a provider of health care services who obtains a label from, or copy of, the Medi-Cal card or other proof of eligibility and who subsequently pursues reimbursement or payment for the cost of covered services from the beneficiary or fails to cease collection efforts against the beneficiary for covered services, as prescribed, may be subject to a penalty, payable to the department, not to exceed 3 times the amount payable by the Medi-Cal program. The bill would also require that prescribed mitigating circumstances be considered when assessing the penalty. The bill would require that a provider have the right to appeal the assessed penalty, as specified. Existing law prohibits a person furnishing information on a specific transaction or experience to any consumer credit reporting agency if the person knows or should know the information is incomplete or inaccurate. This bill would provide that if a Medi-Cal provider or debt collector receives proof of Medi-Cal coverage for services rendered and then reports the services rendered to a consumer credit reporting agency or fails to provide corrections of, or instructions to delete, as appropriate, information regarding Medi-Cal covered services to a consumer reporting agency, the provider or debt collector shall be deemed to be in violation of the above-described provisions.
- Who sponsors AB 1142?
- AB 1142 is sponsored by Price.
- What is the current status of AB 1142?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 27, 2009. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 1142?
- Track AB 1142 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1142
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1142
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →