Agriculture: 22nd District Agricultural Association: greenway zone.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 1177 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 1177.
You're tracking SB 1177
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 1177 — Agriculture: 22nd District Agricultural Association: greenway zone.
Last action — From Assembly without further action.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law provides that the state is divided into agricultural districts in which 50 or more persons, who are residents of a district, may form a district agricultural association for the purpose of holding fairs for exhibiting all of the industries and industrial enterprises, resources, and products of the state and constructing, maintaining, and operating recreational and cultural facilities. This bill would require the 22nd District Agricultural Association (district) to develop, manage, and maintain a minimum 100-foot wide greenway zone at a specified location, a specified section of which would be required to be completed by January 1, 2012, as specified, for the purpose of protecting, enhancing, and restoring the overall environmental quality of the San Dieguito River and adjacent wetlands. The district also would be required to develop a public access trail in the greenway zone, as specified. The district would be required to submit its plan for implementation of the greenway zone to the California Coastal Commission at any time prior to, but no later than, the date the district applies for a coastal development permit, if required, for the replacement of an existing exhibit hall. Construction of certain sections of the greenway zone would be required to be completed prior to a certificate of occupancy being issued for a new exhibit hall, except that the maintenance period may still be incomplete. The bill would require the San Dieguito River Park Joint Powers Authority to maintain and manage the section of the Coast to Crest Trail located in the greenway zone. Because this bill would require a higher level of service from a local governmental entity, the bill would create a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the greenway zone to be permanently dedicated to the use and enjoyment of the public, so that if the district ceases to exist or sells the property, the greenway zone and public access trail remain as a condition of the sale to a local municipal government, or by transferring title of the greenway zone to the San Dieguito River Park Joint Powers Authority or to the Department of Fish and Game. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill Text
- Amended 07/01/10 - Amended Assembly Current pdf July 01, 2010
- Amended 06/01/10 - Amended Senate pdf June 01, 2010
- Introduced 02/18/10 - Introduced pdf February 18, 2010
- SB1177 View text html
Action History
-
From Assembly without further action.
-
From committee without further action.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on AGRI.
-
Set, first hearing. Held in committee and under submission.
-
(Heard in committee on June 28.)
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on AGRI. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) Re-referred to Com. on AGRI.
-
Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Assembly Rule 56 suspended. (Page 5694.)
-
To Coms. on NAT. RES. and AGRI.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 21. Noes 13. Page 3737.) To Assembly.
-
Read second time. Amended. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 3. Page 3672.)
-
(Suspense - for vote only.)
-
Set for hearing May 27.
-
Placed on APPR suspense file.
-
Set for hearing May 3.
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 1. Page 3301.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing April 20.
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on F. & A. (Ayes 5. Noes 3. Page 3163.) Re-referred to Com. on F. & A.
-
Set for hearing April 13.
-
Re-referred to Coms. on N.R. & W. and F. & A.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
Set for hearing April 6.
-
To Coms. on F. & A. and N.R. & W.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 21.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Kehoe · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Kehoe
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 70% | 30% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Gilmore | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 20 | 12 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 21 | 13 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 54% | 33% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Nay |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Negrete | — | Not Voting |
| Harman | — | Nay |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Hollingsworth | — | Nay |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Not Voting |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Ashburn | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 7 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 64% | 27% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Not Voting |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 0% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Not Voting |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 20% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Nay |
| Maldonado | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 56% | 33% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Nay |
| Hollingsworth | — | Nay |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1177 do?
- Existing law provides that the state is divided into agricultural districts in which 50 or more persons, who are residents of a district, may form a district agricultural association for the purpose of holding fairs for exhibiting all of the industries and industrial enterprises, resources, and products of the state and constructing, maintaining, and operating recreational and cultural facilities. This bill would require the 22nd District Agricultural Association (district) to develop, manage, and maintain a minimum 100-foot wide greenway zone at a specified location, a specified section of which would be required to be completed by January 1, 2012, as specified, for the purpose of protecting, enhancing, and restoring the overall environmental quality of the San Dieguito River and adjacent wetlands. The district also would be required to develop a public access trail in the greenway zone, as specified. The district would be required to submit its plan for implementation of the greenway zone to the California Coastal Commission at any time prior to, but no later than, the date the district applies for a coastal development permit, if required, for the replacement of an existing exhibit hall. Construction of certain sections of the greenway zone would be required to be completed prior to a certificate of occupancy being issued for a new exhibit hall, except that the maintenance period may still be incomplete. The bill would require the San Dieguito River Park Joint Powers Authority to maintain and manage the section of the Coast to Crest Trail located in the greenway zone. Because this bill would require a higher level of service from a local governmental entity, the bill would create a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the greenway zone to be permanently dedicated to the use and enjoyment of the public, so that if the district ceases to exist or sells the property, the greenway zone and public access trail remain as a condition of the sale to a local municipal government, or by transferring title of the greenway zone to the San Dieguito River Park Joint Powers Authority or to the Department of Fish and Game. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
- Who sponsors SB 1177?
- SB 1177 is sponsored by Kehoe.
- What is the current status of SB 1177?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1177?
- Track SB 1177 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1177
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1177
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →