Electricity: net energy metering.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 228 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 228.
You're tracking AB 228
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 228 — Electricity: net energy metering.
Last action — From Senate committee without further action.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
(1) Existing law, relative to private energy producers, requires every electric utility, as defined, to make available to an eligible customer‑generator, as defined, a standard contract or tariff for net energy metering on a first-come-first-served basis until the time that the total rated generating capacity used by eligible customer‑generators exceeds 5% of the electric utility's aggregate customer peak demand. The existing definition of an eligible customer-generator limits the generating capacity of the solar or wind turbine electrical generating facility, or hybrid facility of both, used by the eligible customer-generator to one megawatt. This bill would require that the standard contract or tariff for net energy metering be offered on a first-come-first-served basis until the time that the total rated generating capacity used by eligible customer‑generators exceeds 6% of the electric utility's aggregate customer peak demand and, until January 1, 2016, would reserve 1% of this limit for large commercial or industrial customer-generators, as defined. This bill would prohibit the electricity fed back to the electric grid by large commercial or industrial customer-generators from offsetting charges for transmission and distribution services. The bill would revise the definition of an eligible customer-generator to authorize generating facilities of up to 5 megawatts. The bill would make other conforming and clarifying changes. (2) Existing law requires electric utilities to ensure that requests for an interconnection agreement from an eligible customer-generator are processed in a time period not to exceed 30 working days from the date the application is received. This bill would require electric utilities to process these requests from eligible large commercial or industrial customer-generators in a time period not to exceed 90 days and would require the costs of required interconnection studies and upgrades to be paid by the large commercial or industrial customer-generator. (3) Existing law makes legislative findings and declarations relative to the repeal of provisions of the net metering program for large customers. This bill would repeal these findings and declarations.
Bill Text
- Amended 06/17/10 - Amended Senate Current pdf June 17, 2010
- Amended 05/24/10 - Amended Senate pdf May 24, 2010
- Amended 05/10/10 - Amended Senate pdf May 10, 2010
- Amended 02/19/10 - Amended Senate pdf February 19, 2010
- Amended 06/22/09 - Amended Senate pdf June 22, 2009
- Amended 04/20/09 - Amended Assembly pdf April 20, 2009
- Amended 04/02/09 - Amended Assembly pdf April 02, 2009
- Introduced 02/04/09 - Introduced pdf February 04, 2009
- AB228 View text html
Action History
-
From Senate committee without further action.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
-
Re-referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Withdrawn from committee. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
-
In committee: Set, second hearing. Testimony taken. Further hearing to be set.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 45. Noes 31. Page 1542.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 5.) (May 6).
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (April 27).
-
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. (Ayes 9. Noes 5.) (April 13).
-
Re-referred to Com. on U. & C.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on U. & C. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Coms. on U. & C. and NAT. RES.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 7.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Blakeslee · Cosponsor
- Huffman · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Huffman
Co-sponsors (1)
- Blakeslee
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 0 | 1 | 0 | 10 |
| % of votes cast | 0% | 9% | 0% | 91% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Corbett | — | Not Voting |
| Florez | — | Not Voting |
| Lowenthal | — | Not Voting |
| Dutton | — | Not Voting |
| Kehoe | — | Not Voting |
| Simitian | — | Not Voting |
| Wright | — | Not Voting |
| Cox | — | Not Voting |
| DeSaulnier | — | Not Voting |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 48 | 32 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 54 | 34 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 59% | 37% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (92)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Nay |
| Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Tom | — | Nay |
| Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Gaines | — | Nay |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Nay |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Saldana | — | Not Voting |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Price | — | Not Voting |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Torres | — | Not Voting |
| Tran | — | Nay |
| Adams | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Nay |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Nay |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Eng | — | Not Voting |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Gilmore | — | Nay |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Nay |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 13 | 6 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 62% | 29% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (21)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Nay |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Charles | — | Not Voting |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 70% | 30% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Gilmore | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 6 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 6 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 56% | 38% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (16)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Nay |
| Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Nay |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Not Voting |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 228 do?
- (1) Existing law, relative to private energy producers, requires every electric utility, as defined, to make available to an eligible customer‑generator, as defined, a standard contract or tariff for net energy metering on a first-come-first-served basis until the time that the total rated generating capacity used by eligible customer‑generators exceeds 5% of the electric utility's aggregate customer peak demand. The existing definition of an eligible customer-generator limits the generating capacity of the solar or wind turbine electrical generating facility, or hybrid facility of both, used by the eligible customer-generator to one megawatt. This bill would require that the standard contract or tariff for net energy metering be offered on a first-come-first-served basis until the time that the total rated generating capacity used by eligible customer‑generators exceeds 6% of the electric utility's aggregate customer peak demand and, until January 1, 2016, would reserve 1% of this limit for large commercial or industrial customer-generators, as defined. This bill would prohibit the electricity fed back to the electric grid by large commercial or industrial customer-generators from offsetting charges for transmission and distribution services. The bill would revise the definition of an eligible customer-generator to authorize generating facilities of up to 5 megawatts. The bill would make other conforming and clarifying changes. (2) Existing law requires electric utilities to ensure that requests for an interconnection agreement from an eligible customer-generator are processed in a time period not to exceed 30 working days from the date the application is received. This bill would require electric utilities to process these requests from eligible large commercial or industrial customer-generators in a time period not to exceed 90 days and would require the costs of required interconnection studies and upgrades to be paid by the large commercial or industrial customer-generator. (3) Existing law makes legislative findings and declarations relative to the repeal of provisions of the net metering program for large customers. This bill would repeal these findings and declarations.
- Who sponsors AB 228?
- AB 228 is sponsored by Blakeslee and Huffman.
- What is the current status of AB 228?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 228?
- Track AB 228 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 228
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 228
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →