California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate

SB 653 — State employees: memorandum of understanding.

Last action — From Assembly without further action.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Under existing law, a provision of a memorandum of understanding reached between the state employer and a recognized employee organization representing state civil service employees that requires the expenditure of funds does not become effective unless approved by the Legislature in the annual Budget Act. This bill would approve provisions that require the expenditure of funds of a memorandum of understanding entered into between the state employer and an unspecified bargaining unit, and would provide that these provisions will become effective even if these provisions are approved by the Legislature in legislation other than the annual Budget Act. This bill would provide that provisions of the memorandum of understanding approved by this bill that require the expenditure of funds will not take effect unless funds for these provisions are specifically appropriated by the Legislature, and would require the state employer and the affected employee organization to meet and confer to renegotiate the affected provisions if funds for these provisions are not specifically appropriated by the Legislature.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From Assembly without further action.

  2. From committee without further action.

  3. Hearing postponed by committee.

  4. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on P.E.,R. & S.S.

  5. (Heard in Committee on June 17.)

  6. From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on P.E.,R. & S.S. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on P.E.,R. & S.S.

  7. Re-referred to Com. on RULES.

  8. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  9. Hearing postponed by committee.

  10. To Com. on JUD.

  11. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  12. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 1149.) To Assembly.

  13. To Special Consent Calendar.

  14. Read second time. Amended. To third reading.

  15. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 13. Noes 0. Page 1026.)

  16. (For vote only.)

  17. Set for hearing May 26.

  18. Set, first hearing. Testimony taken. Further hearing to be set.

  19. Set for hearing May 18.

  20. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  21. From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 702.)

  22. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  23. Set for hearing April 28.

  24. Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  25. Set for hearing April 21.

  26. Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  27. Set for hearing April 14.

  28. To Com. on JUD.

  29. Read first time.

  30. From print. May be acted upon on or after March 30.

  31. Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Correa · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Correa

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Special Consent #7 SB653 Correa

Passed 40 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 37000
Democratic 2000
Republican 1000
Total 40000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Harman — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Runner — Yea
Cogdill — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Huff — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Ashburn — Yea
Benoit — Yea
Correa — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wiggins — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Aanestad — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Hollingsworth — Yea
Maldonado — Yea
Romero — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wright — Yea
Cox — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Yea
Florez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 13 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 13000
Total 13000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (13)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Runner — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Cox — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Leno — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

labor
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 653 do?
Under existing law, a provision of a memorandum of understanding reached between the state employer and a recognized employee organization representing state civil service employees that requires the expenditure of funds does not become effective unless approved by the Legislature in the annual Budget Act. This bill would approve provisions that require the expenditure of funds of a memorandum of understanding entered into between the state employer and an unspecified bargaining unit, and would provide that these provisions will become effective even if these provisions are approved by the Legislature in legislation other than the annual Budget Act. This bill would provide that provisions of the memorandum of understanding approved by this bill that require the expenditure of funds will not take effect unless funds for these provisions are specifically appropriated by the Legislature, and would require the state employer and the affected employee organization to meet and confer to renegotiate the affected provisions if funds for these provisions are not specifically appropriated by the Legislature.
Who sponsors SB 653?
SB 653 is sponsored by Correa.
What is the current status of SB 653?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 653?
Track SB 653 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 653

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 653

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →