State boards and commissions: salaries: suspension.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 685 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 685.
You're tracking SB 685
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 685 — State boards and commissions: salaries: suspension.
Last action — Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law provides for the payment of specified salaries to the members of various state boards and commissions. A member of a state board or commission may receive a per diem salary at a specified rate, except for a member whose salary is set pursuant to certain provisions of law. This bill would prohibit members appointed to specified state boards and commissions from receiving a salary for the 2010–11, 2011–12, and 2012–13 fiscal years. This bill would authorize a member of a state board or commission who is prohibited from receiving a salary under these provisions to receive a specified per diem payment during those fiscal years.
Bill Text
- Amended 04/13/09 - Amended Senate Current pdf April 13, 2009
- Introduced 02/27/09 - Introduced pdf February 27, 2009
- SB685 View text html
Action History
-
Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
-
Set, first hearing. Failed passage in committee. (Ayes 5. Noes 5. Page 682.) Reconsideration granted.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on G.O.
-
Set for hearing April 28.
-
To Com. on G.O.
-
Read first time.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 30.
-
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Tony Strickland · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Strickland, Tony Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 5 | 5 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 38% | 38% | 0% | 23% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Not Voting |
| Negrete | — | Not Voting |
| Wright | — | Nay |
| Benoit | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Nay |
| Wiggins | — | Nay |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Nay |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 77% | 0% | 0% | 23% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Not Voting |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Not Voting |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 685 do?
- Existing law provides for the payment of specified salaries to the members of various state boards and commissions. A member of a state board or commission may receive a per diem salary at a specified rate, except for a member whose salary is set pursuant to certain provisions of law. This bill would prohibit members appointed to specified state boards and commissions from receiving a salary for the 2010–11, 2011–12, and 2012–13 fiscal years. This bill would authorize a member of a state board or commission who is prohibited from receiving a salary under these provisions to receive a specified per diem payment during those fiscal years.
- Who sponsors SB 685?
- SB 685 is sponsored by Strickland, Tony (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 685?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 685?
- Track SB 685 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 685
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 685
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →