Health facilities: chilling or therapeutic hypothermia.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1882 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1882.
You're tracking AB 1882
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1882 — Health facilities: chilling or therapeutic hypothermia.
Last action — From committee without further action.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law provides for the licensure of health facilities, including general acute care hospitals, by the State Department of Public Health. The violation of these provisions is a misdemeanor. This bill would require each general acute care hospital with an emergency department to adopt a protocol or policy establishing a procedure for assessing patients in the emergency room who are comatose after experiencing cardiac arrest to determine whether to treat these patients with chilling or therapeutic hypothermia. The bill would also impose additional requirements upon the hospital if it undertakes this treatment. By creating a new crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Amended 03/10/10 - Amended Assembly Current pdf March 10, 2010
- Introduced 02/16/10 - Introduced pdf February 16, 2010
- AB1882 View text html
Action History
-
From committee without further action.
-
In committee: Set, second hearing. Held without recommendation.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Portantino · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Portantino
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1882 do?
- Existing law provides for the licensure of health facilities, including general acute care hospitals, by the State Department of Public Health. The violation of these provisions is a misdemeanor. This bill would require each general acute care hospital with an emergency department to adopt a protocol or policy establishing a procedure for assessing patients in the emergency room who are comatose after experiencing cardiac arrest to determine whether to treat these patients with chilling or therapeutic hypothermia. The bill would also impose additional requirements upon the hospital if it undertakes this treatment. By creating a new crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 1882?
- AB 1882 is sponsored by Portantino.
- What is the current status of AB 1882?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1882?
- Track AB 1882 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1882
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1882
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →