California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 1199 — Infrastructure financing districts: City and County of San Francisco.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 664, Statutes of 2010.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 27, 2009. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 9 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law specifically authorizes the City and County of San Francisco to create infrastructure financing districts, adopt infrastructure financing plans for those districts, and issue bonds financed by projected increases in ad valorem property taxes to fund certain public facilities, pursuant to a specified procedure. Existing property tax law establishes various procedures and requirements with respect to the annual apportionment and allocation of ad valorem property tax revenues, including increased revenues from infrastructure financing districts. This bill would recast these provisions authorizing the City and County of San Francisco to create infrastructure financing districts that include specified waterfront property. This bill would also modify the procedures for San Francisco to adopt an infrastructure financing plan, and allocate projected increases in ad valorem property taxes to specified annual apportionments. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for City and County of San Francisco.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 664, Statutes of 2010.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and to the Governor at 3 p.m.

  4. In Assembly. To enrollment.

  5. Read third time, passed, and to Assembly. (Ayes 30. Noes 0. Page 4871.)

  6. Read second time. To third reading.

  7. Received August 13 pursuant to JR 61(b)(14).

  8. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (August 12).

  9. In committee: Placed on APPR suspense file.

  10. From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (April 7).

  11. Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and APPR.

  12. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  13. Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 70. Noes 2. Page 3887.)

  14. Read second time. To third reading.

  15. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (January 21).

  16. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  17. From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (January 13).

  18. From committee: Be re-referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.). (1/7/2010)

  19. Re-referred to Com. on RULES. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.

  20. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  21. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.

  22. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  23. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  24. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.

  25. Referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  26. Read first time.

  27. From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.

  28. Introduced. To print.

Sponsors

  • Ammiano · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Ammiano

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Assembly 3rd Reading AB1199 Ammiano By Leno

Passed 31 Yea · 0 Nay · 9 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 29008
Democratic 1001
Republican 1000
Total 31009
% of votes cast 78%0%0%23%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Cogdill — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Florez — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Huff — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Correa — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Romero — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Runner — Not Voting
Hollingsworth — Not Voting
Ducheny — Not Voting
Oropeza — Not Voting
Simitian — Not Voting
Steinberg — Yea
Wiggins — Not Voting
Wolk — Yea
Aanestad — Yea
Ashburn — Not Voting
Blakeslee — Yea
Harman — Not Voting
Pavley — Yea
Price — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wright — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 11 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 11000
Total 11000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Leno — Yea
Price — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Ashburn — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Walters — Yea
Emmerson — Yea

Official roll call →

Placed on Appropriations Suspense file.

Passed 10 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 10001
Total 10001
% of votes cast 91%0%0%9%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Not Voting
Corbett — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Cox — Yea
Price — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Leno — Yea
Denham — Yea

Official roll call →

AB 1199 AMMIANO Assembly Third Reading

Passed 80 Yea · 2 Nay · 8 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 74208
Democratic 3000
Republican 3000
Total 80208
% of votes cast 89%2%0%9%
How each member voted (90)
Member Party Vote
Chesbro — Yea
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Cook — Yea
Coto — Yea
Bill — Yea
Tom — Yea
Charles — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Fong — Yea
Adams — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Beall — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Audra — Yea
V. — Not Voting
Manuel — Not Voting
Perez — Not Voting
Furutani — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Gilmore — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Hall — Not Voting
Harkey — Nay
Hayashi — Yea
Hill — Yea
Bass — Not Voting
Huffman — Yea
Knight — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Nay
Monning — Yea
Nava — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Silva — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Villines — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Huber — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Logue — Yea
Ma — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Torlakson — Not Voting
Tran — Yea
Carter — Not Voting
Conway — Not Voting
Emmerson — Yea
Evans — Yea
Davis — Yea
DeVore — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 16 Yea · 6 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 15500
Democratic 1000
Republican 0100
Total 16600
% of votes cast 73%27%0%0%
How each member voted (22)
Member Party Vote
Conway — Nay
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Charles — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Audra — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Miller — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Coto — Yea
Davis — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Be referred to Committee on Local Government.

Passed 10 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 10001
Total 10001
% of votes cast 91%0%0%9%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Fuller — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Hall — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Silva — Yea
Adams — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Swanson — Not Voting
Torlakson — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea

Official roll call →

Be referred to Committee on Appropriations.

Passed 10 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 10001
Total 10001
% of votes cast 91%0%0%9%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Silva — Yea
Swanson — Not Voting
Adams — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

taxation finance housing transportation
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 1199 do?
Existing law specifically authorizes the City and County of San Francisco to create infrastructure financing districts, adopt infrastructure financing plans for those districts, and issue bonds financed by projected increases in ad valorem property taxes to fund certain public facilities, pursuant to a specified procedure. Existing property tax law establishes various procedures and requirements with respect to the annual apportionment and allocation of ad valorem property tax revenues, including increased revenues from infrastructure financing districts. This bill would recast these provisions authorizing the City and County of San Francisco to create infrastructure financing districts that include specified waterfront property. This bill would also modify the procedures for San Francisco to adopt an infrastructure financing plan, and allocate projected increases in ad valorem property taxes to specified annual apportionments. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for City and County of San Francisco.
Who sponsors AB 1199?
AB 1199 is sponsored by Ammiano.
What is the current status of AB 1199?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 27, 2009. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 1199?
Track AB 1199 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 1199

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 1199

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →