Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges: consultation process.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 2482 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 2482.
You're tracking AB 2482
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 2482 — Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges: consultation process.
Last action — From Senate committee without further action.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law establishes the California Community Colleges as one of the segments of public postsecondary education in this state. Existing law establishes the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges to administer the community colleges and requires the board to provide general supervision over the community college districts and to perform various functions. Existing law requires the board, in performing those functions, to establish and carry out a process for consultation with institutional representatives of community college districts to ensure their participation in the development and review of policy proposals. Existing law also requires the consultation process to afford community college organizations, as well as interested individuals and parties, an opportunity to review and comment on proposed policy before it is adopted by the board. Pursuant to these consultation requirements, the board has established a consultation council composed of various members. This bill would require the board to include among the membership of the consultation council 2 members who are classified employees, each representing one of 2 different statewide collective bargaining organizations.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removed1 line(s) added, 1 removed.
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBillText Information PDF2 Add To My Favorites | Version:
View plain text versions (2)
- Introduced 02/19/10 - Introduced Current pdf February 19, 2010
- AB2482 View text html
Action History
-
From Senate committee without further action.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on ED.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 50. Noes 25. Page 5132.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 5.) (April 28).
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (April 20).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
-
Introduced. To print.
Sponsors
- Furutani · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Furutani
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 55 | 26 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 59 | 28 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 65% | 31% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Bill | — | Nay |
| Tom | — | Nay |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Gilmore | — | Nay |
| Hagman | — | Not Voting |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Not Voting |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Not Voting |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Nay |
| Adams | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Not Voting |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Nay |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 5 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 11 | 5 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 58% | 26% | 0% | 16% |
How each member voted (19)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Not Voting |
| Bradford | — | Not Voting |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Nay |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2482 do?
- Existing law establishes the California Community Colleges as one of the segments of public postsecondary education in this state. Existing law establishes the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges to administer the community colleges and requires the board to provide general supervision over the community college districts and to perform various functions. Existing law requires the board, in performing those functions, to establish and carry out a process for consultation with institutional representatives of community college districts to ensure their participation in the development and review of policy proposals. Existing law also requires the consultation process to afford community college organizations, as well as interested individuals and parties, an opportunity to review and comment on proposed policy before it is adopted by the board. Pursuant to these consultation requirements, the board has established a consultation council composed of various members. This bill would require the board to include among the membership of the consultation council 2 members who are classified employees, each representing one of 2 different statewide collective bargaining organizations.
- Who sponsors AB 2482?
- AB 2482 is sponsored by Furutani.
- What is the current status of AB 2482?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 2482?
- Track AB 2482 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2482
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2482
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →