A resolution to propose to the people of the State of California an amendment to the Constitution of the St...
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SCA 26 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SCA 26.
You're tracking SCA 26
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SCA 26 — A resolution to propose to the people of the State of California an amendment to the Constitution of the State, by amending Section 9 of Article IX thereof, relating to the University of California.
Last action — From committee without further action.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The California Constitution establishes the University of California as a public trust and requires the university to be administered by the Regents of the University of California, a corporation in the form of a board, with full powers of organization and government, subject to legislative control only for specified purposes. These provisions grant the regents all powers necessary or convenient for the effective administration of its trust. This measure would prohibit an increase in the mandatory systemwide fees charged to students attending the university that is adopted by the regents from becoming effective before 180 calendar days have elapsed after the date on which the increase is adopted. The measure would prohibit the regents from increasing mandatory systemwide fees in any fiscal year by a cumulative amount exceeding 10% of the mandatory systemwide fees charged for the immediately preceding fiscal year.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removed1 line(s) added, 1 removed.
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBillText Information PDF2 Add To My Favorites | Version:
View plain text versions (2)
- Introduced 02/01/10 - Introduced Current pdf February 01, 2010
- SCA26 View text html
Action History
-
From committee without further action.
-
Set, second hearing. Failed passage in committee. (Ayes 2. Noes 2. Page 3296.) Reconsideration granted.
-
Set for hearing April 21.
-
Set, first hearing. Further hearing to be set.
-
Set for hearing April 14.
-
To Coms. on ED. and E., R., & C.A.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 4.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Denham · Primary
- Yee · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Denham
Co-sponsors (1)
- Yee
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Not Voting |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Total | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 22% | 22% | 0% | 56% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Not Voting |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Not Voting |
| Price | — | Not Voting |
| Romero | — | Not Voting |
| Simitian | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Nay |
| Maldonado | — | Not Voting |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SCA 26 do?
- The California Constitution establishes the University of California as a public trust and requires the university to be administered by the Regents of the University of California, a corporation in the form of a board, with full powers of organization and government, subject to legislative control only for specified purposes. These provisions grant the regents all powers necessary or convenient for the effective administration of its trust. This measure would prohibit an increase in the mandatory systemwide fees charged to students attending the university that is adopted by the regents from becoming effective before 180 calendar days have elapsed after the date on which the increase is adopted. The measure would prohibit the regents from increasing mandatory systemwide fees in any fiscal year by a cumulative amount exceeding 10% of the mandatory systemwide fees charged for the immediately preceding fiscal year.
- Who sponsors SCA 26?
- SCA 26 is sponsored by Denham and Yee.
- What is the current status of SCA 26?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SCA 26?
- Track SCA 26 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SCA 26
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SCA 26
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →