Food safety.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 602 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 602.
You're tracking SB 602
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 602 — Food safety.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 309, Statutes of 2010.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The California Retail Food Code provides for the regulation of health and sanitation standards for retail food facilities by the State Department of Public Health. Under existing law, a violation of these provisions is a misdemeanor. Local health agencies are primarily responsible for enforcing this law. This law generally requires food facilities, except temporary food facilities, to have an owner or employee who has successfully passed an approved and accredited food safety certification examination from an accredited food protection manager certification organization, except as specified. This bill would require at least one of the accredited food safety certification examinations to be offered online. This bill would also require, with specified exceptions, a food handler, as defined, who is hired prior to June 1, 2011, to obtain a food handler card on or before July 1, 2011. The bill would require food handlers hired after June 1, 2011, to obtain a food handler card within 30 days of his or her date of hire. It would require each food handler to maintain a valid food handler card for the duration of his or her employment as a food handler. This bill would exempt from compliance any food handler subject to an existing local food handler program that took effect prior to January 1, 2009, and would also require a food facility that employs food handlers to maintain records documenting that each food handler employed by the facility possesses a food handler card. The bill would require at least one food handler training course to cost no more than $15 and, if a training course is not available at that cost, would remove the requirement to obtain a food handler card. By creating a new crime and expanding the duties of local enforcement officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/27/10 - Chaptered Current pdf September 27, 2010
- Enrolled 08/31/10 - Enrolled pdf August 31, 2010
- Amended 06/07/10 - Amended Assembly pdf June 07, 2010
- Amended 03/25/10 - Amended Assembly pdf March 25, 2010
- Amended 03/10/10 - Amended Assembly pdf March 10, 2010
- Amended 01/05/10 - Amended Assembly pdf January 05, 2010
- Amended 07/01/09 - Amended Assembly pdf July 01, 2009
- Amended 05/28/09 - Amended Senate pdf May 28, 2009
- Amended 05/18/09 - Amended Senate pdf May 18, 2009
- Amended 04/28/09 - Amended Senate pdf April 28, 2009
- Amended 04/21/09 - Amended Senate pdf April 21, 2009
- Amended 04/13/09 - Amended Senate pdf April 13, 2009
- Introduced 02/27/09 - Introduced pdf February 27, 2009
- SB602 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 309, Statutes of 2010.
-
Approved by Governor.
-
Enrolled. To Governor at 4 p.m.
-
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 30. Noes 1. Page 4975.) To enrollment.
-
Urgency clause adopted.
-
From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 6. Noes 1. Page 4954.)
-
(For vote only.)
-
Set for hearing August 26.
-
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on HEALTH. (Ayes 4. Noes 0. Page 4565.) Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.
-
In Senate. To unfinished business.
-
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 74. Noes 1. Page 6238.) To Senate.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
(Heard in committee on June 30).
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.)
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
(Heard in committee on March 23.)
-
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.)
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
(Heard in committee on September 10.)
-
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on HEALTH. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on G.O.
-
To Com. on G.O.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 23. Noes 13. Page 1182.) To Assembly.
-
Read second time. Amended. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 5. Page 1073.)
-
(Suspense - for vote only.)
-
Set for hearing May 28.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Placed on APPR suspense file.
-
Set for hearing May 11.
-
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 3. Page 639.)
-
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on REV. & TAX. (Ayes 7. Noes 3. Page 556.)
-
Set for hearing April 22 in REV. & TAX. pending receipt.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
Set for hearing April 15.
-
To Coms. on HEALTH and REV. & TAX.
-
Read first time.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 31.
-
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- DeSaulnier · Cosponsor
- Denham · Cosponsor
- Stephen C. Padilla · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 119 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic
Co-sponsors (2)
- DeSaulnier
- Denham
Not signed on (119)
119 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 119 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 29 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 31 | 1 | 0 | 8 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 3% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Not Voting |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Not Voting |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Not Voting |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Not Voting |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 80 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 85 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 93% | 1% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Not Voting |
| Monning | — | Nay |
| Bass | — | Not Voting |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Not Voting |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Not Voting |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (19)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 21 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 23 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 0% | 0% | 12% |
How each member voted (26)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carter | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Not Voting |
| Lowenthal | — | Not Voting |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Not Voting |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 0% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Not Voting |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 22 | 12 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 24 | 13 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 33% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Nay |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Not Voting |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Nay |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Nay |
| Benoit | — | Nay |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Not Voting |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Nay |
| Cox | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Florez | — | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 7 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 54% | 38% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Not Voting |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Cox | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 63% | 38% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (8)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Nay |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 25% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (12)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Not Voting |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 602 do?
- The California Retail Food Code provides for the regulation of health and sanitation standards for retail food facilities by the State Department of Public Health. Under existing law, a violation of these provisions is a misdemeanor. Local health agencies are primarily responsible for enforcing this law. This law generally requires food facilities, except temporary food facilities, to have an owner or employee who has successfully passed an approved and accredited food safety certification examination from an accredited food protection manager certification organization, except as specified. This bill would require at least one of the accredited food safety certification examinations to be offered online. This bill would also require, with specified exceptions, a food handler, as defined, who is hired prior to June 1, 2011, to obtain a food handler card on or before July 1, 2011. The bill would require food handlers hired after June 1, 2011, to obtain a food handler card within 30 days of his or her date of hire. It would require each food handler to maintain a valid food handler card for the duration of his or her employment as a food handler. This bill would exempt from compliance any food handler subject to an existing local food handler program that took effect prior to January 1, 2009, and would also require a food facility that employs food handlers to maintain records documenting that each food handler employed by the facility possesses a food handler card. The bill would require at least one food handler training course to cost no more than $15 and, if a training course is not available at that cost, would remove the requirement to obtain a food handler card. By creating a new crime and expanding the duties of local enforcement officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
- Who sponsors SB 602?
- SB 602 is sponsored by DeSaulnier, Denham, and Padilla, Stephen C. (Democratic).
- What is the current status of SB 602?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 602?
- Track SB 602 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 602
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 602
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →