Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 989 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 989.
You're tracking SB 989
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 989 — Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004.
Last action — From Assembly without further action.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law, the Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004, allows aggrieved employees to bring civil actions to recover penalties for violations of the Labor Code if the Labor and Workforce Development Agency or its departments, divisions, commissions, boards, agencies, or employees do not do so. The penalties collected in these actions are distributed 75% to the agency to be continuously appropriated for purposes of enforcement and education and 25% to the aggrieved employee, except that if the person does not employ one or more persons, 100% of the penalties are distributed to the agency by continuous appropriation. This bill would require an employee requesting court approval of the settlement of a civil action brought under the act to serve a copy of the court's final approval order and settlement agreement to the agency within 20 days after the order is made and the settlement is final. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill Text
- Amended 05/11/10 - Amended Senate Current pdf May 11, 2010
- Amended 04/15/10 - Amended Senate pdf April 15, 2010
- Amended 03/23/10 - Amended Senate pdf March 23, 2010
- Introduced 02/08/10 - Introduced pdf February 08, 2010
- SB989 View text html
Action History
-
From Assembly without further action.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 30. Noes 0. Page 4306.) To Assembly.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 4. Noes 0. Page 4167.)
-
Set for hearing June 29.
-
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 3429.)
-
(For vote only.)
-
Set for hearing May 3.
-
Set, first hearing. Testimony taken. Further hearing to be set.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
-
Set for hearing April 28.
-
Re-referred to Coms. on L. & I.R. and JUD.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
To Com. on RLS.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 11.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Hollingsworth · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Hollingsworth
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 28 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 31 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| % of votes cast | 79% | 0% | 0% | 21% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Not Voting |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Wiggins | — | Not Voting |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Not Voting |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Not Voting |
| Florez | — | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 0% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 989 do?
- Existing law, the Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004, allows aggrieved employees to bring civil actions to recover penalties for violations of the Labor Code if the Labor and Workforce Development Agency or its departments, divisions, commissions, boards, agencies, or employees do not do so. The penalties collected in these actions are distributed 75% to the agency to be continuously appropriated for purposes of enforcement and education and 25% to the aggrieved employee, except that if the person does not employ one or more persons, 100% of the penalties are distributed to the agency by continuous appropriation. This bill would require an employee requesting court approval of the settlement of a civil action brought under the act to serve a copy of the court's final approval order and settlement agreement to the agency within 20 days after the order is made and the settlement is final. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
- Who sponsors SB 989?
- SB 989 is sponsored by Hollingsworth.
- What is the current status of SB 989?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 989?
- Track SB 989 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 989
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 989
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →