SB 112 — Hemodialysis technicians.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 559, Statutes of 2009.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing federal law sets forth certain requirements that dialysis facilities must meet in order to be certified under the Medicare Program, including a requirement that patient care dialysis technicians at those facilities complete a specified training program, have a high school diploma or equivalency, be certified under a state or national certification program, and meet all applicable state requirements, as specified. Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation of various clinical laboratory personnel and makes a violation of those provisions a crime. Within that law, the Hemodialysis Technician Training Act prohibits a person from providing services as a hemodialysis technician without being certified by the State Department of Public Health as meeting certain requirements, as specified. This bill would revise those requirements and prohibit a person from providing services as a hemodialysis technician without being certified by the department as having a high school diploma or equivalency or 4 years of specified work experience, successfully completing a training program meeting specified requirements, and passing a standardized test, certified by faculty of the University of California and approved by the department, as specified, or passing an examination offered by a certification program approved by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, as specified. The bill would require technicians certified by the department as of the bill's operative date to meet those requirements by April 15, 2010, as specified. The bill would make other conforming and technical, nonsubstantive changes. By changing the definition of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would also declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/11/09 - Chaptered Current pdf October 11, 2009
- Enrolled 09/08/09 - Enrolled pdf September 08, 2009
- Amended 08/27/09 - Amended Assembly pdf August 27, 2009
- Amended 08/24/09 - Amended Assembly pdf August 24, 2009
- Amended 06/03/09 - Amended Assembly pdf June 03, 2009
- Amended 04/01/09 - Amended Senate pdf April 01, 2009
- Amended 03/04/09 - Amended Senate pdf March 04, 2009
- Introduced 01/29/09 - Introduced pdf January 29, 2009
- SB112 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 559, Statutes of 2009.
-
Approved by Governor.
-
Enrolled. To Governor at 9 p.m.
-
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 2218.) To enrollment.
-
In Senate. To unfinished business.
-
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 74. Noes 0. Page 2819.) To Senate.
-
Read third time. Amended. (Page 2756.) To third reading.
-
Read third time. Amended. (Page 2706.) To third reading.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
(Heard in committee on July 8.)
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.)
-
(Heard in committee on June 30.)
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on B. & P.
-
To Com. on B. & P.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 623.) To Assembly.
-
To Special Consent Calendar.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 555.)
-
Set for hearing April 20.
-
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0. Page 339.)
-
Set for hearing March 23.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
-
To Com. on B., P. & E.D.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 1.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Oropeza · Primary
- Wyland · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Oropeza
Co-sponsors (1)
- Wyland
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 34 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 37 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 0% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (41)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Not Voting |
| Ducheny | — | Not Voting |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Not Voting |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Not Voting |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 80 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 86 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Not Voting |
| Duvall | — | Not Voting |
| Knight | — | Not Voting |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Not Voting |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Not Voting |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 18 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 20 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (21)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Not Voting |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (12)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Eng | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 34 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 38 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Not Voting |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 85% | 0% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 112 do?
- Existing federal law sets forth certain requirements that dialysis facilities must meet in order to be certified under the Medicare Program, including a requirement that patient care dialysis technicians at those facilities complete a specified training program, have a high school diploma or equivalency, be certified under a state or national certification program, and meet all applicable state requirements, as specified. Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation of various clinical laboratory personnel and makes a violation of those provisions a crime. Within that law, the Hemodialysis Technician Training Act prohibits a person from providing services as a hemodialysis technician without being certified by the State Department of Public Health as meeting certain requirements, as specified. This bill would revise those requirements and prohibit a person from providing services as a hemodialysis technician without being certified by the department as having a high school diploma or equivalency or 4 years of specified work experience, successfully completing a training program meeting specified requirements, and passing a standardized test, certified by faculty of the University of California and approved by the department, as specified, or passing an examination offered by a certification program approved by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, as specified. The bill would require technicians certified by the department as of the bill's operative date to meet those requirements by April 15, 2010, as specified. The bill would make other conforming and technical, nonsubstantive changes. By changing the definition of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would also declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
- Who sponsors SB 112?
- SB 112 is sponsored by Oropeza and Wyland.
- What is the current status of SB 112?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 112?
- Track SB 112 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 112
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 112
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →