Public utilities: residential utility services.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 771 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 771.
You're tracking AB 771
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 771 — Public utilities: residential utility services.
Last action — From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
(1) Existing law prohibits a municipally owned or operated public utility (publicly owned utility) furnishing light, water, power, or heat, or an electrical, gas, heat, or water corporation, (corporation) from terminating residential service for nonpayment of a delinquent account in specified situations, including on the certification of a licensed physician and surgeon that to do so will be life threatening to the customer and the customer is financially unable to pay for service within the normal payment period and willing to enter into an amortization agreement with the publicly owned utility or corporation with respect to all charges that the customer is unable to pay prior to delinquency. Existing law permits a customer meeting these requirements to amortize the unpaid balance of a bill over a period not exceeding 12 months. This bill would increase the maximum amortization period to 18 months. (2) Existing law prohibits an electrical, gas, heat, telephone, or water corporation from terminating residential service for nonpayment of any delinquent account or other indebtedness owned by the customer or subscriber to any other person or corporation or when the obligation represented by the delinquent account or other indebtedness was incurred with a person or corporation other than the corporation demanding payment for it. The act exempts from this prohibition a utility that collects sanitation or sewerage charges for a public agency, as specified. This bill would delete that exemption. (3) Existing law requires a decision of an electrical, gas, heat, telephone, or water corporation to require a new residential applicant to deposit a sum of money with that corporation prior to furnishing service to be based solely upon the creditworthiness of the applicant, as determined by the corporation. This bill would prohibit those corporations from seeking to recover charges or penalties, in connection with furnishing services to a tenant of the owner of the residential property to which services were provided, from any subsequent tenant or the property owner. The bill also would prohibit those corporations from demanding or receiving a security deposit in an amount that is more than 2 times the estimated average periodic bill or 3 times the estimated average monthly bill for the provision of services and would prohibit those corporations from imposing a reconnection charge for terminated service if the customer provides that security deposit. (4) Existing law requires the decision of a publicly owned utility to require a new residential applicant to deposit a sum of money with the publicly owned utility prior to furnishing service to be based solely upon the creditworthiness of the applicant, as determined by the public utility. Existing law limits the amount of money that a publicly owned utility may demand or receive from a customer as security for the provision of services. This bill would prohibit a publicly owned utility from demanding or receiving a charge for reconnecting service terminated for nonpayment if the customer posts that security. By imposing new duties on publicly owned utilities, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (5) Under existing law, a violation of any provision of the Public Utilities Act or of any rules or orders issued under the act, is a crime. By imposing new requirements under the act, the violation of which is a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (6) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
1 added · 1 removed1 line(s) added, 1 removed.
Bill Number Bill Keyword Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites Bill Information >> Bill Search >> Text Bill TextBillText Information PDF2 Add To My Favorites | Version:
View plain text versions (2)
- Introduced 02/26/09 - Introduced Current pdf February 26, 2009
- AB771 View text html
Action History
-
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
-
Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on U. & C.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 29.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- De Leon · Cosponsor
- Torres · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Torres
Co-sponsors (1)
- De Leon
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 771 do?
- (1) Existing law prohibits a municipally owned or operated public utility (publicly owned utility) furnishing light, water, power, or heat, or an electrical, gas, heat, or water corporation, (corporation) from terminating residential service for nonpayment of a delinquent account in specified situations, including on the certification of a licensed physician and surgeon that to do so will be life threatening to the customer and the customer is financially unable to pay for service within the normal payment period and willing to enter into an amortization agreement with the publicly owned utility or corporation with respect to all charges that the customer is unable to pay prior to delinquency. Existing law permits a customer meeting these requirements to amortize the unpaid balance of a bill over a period not exceeding 12 months. This bill would increase the maximum amortization period to 18 months. (2) Existing law prohibits an electrical, gas, heat, telephone, or water corporation from terminating residential service for nonpayment of any delinquent account or other indebtedness owned by the customer or subscriber to any other person or corporation or when the obligation represented by the delinquent account or other indebtedness was incurred with a person or corporation other than the corporation demanding payment for it. The act exempts from this prohibition a utility that collects sanitation or sewerage charges for a public agency, as specified. This bill would delete that exemption. (3) Existing law requires a decision of an electrical, gas, heat, telephone, or water corporation to require a new residential applicant to deposit a sum of money with that corporation prior to furnishing service to be based solely upon the creditworthiness of the applicant, as determined by the corporation. This bill would prohibit those corporations from seeking to recover charges or penalties, in connection with furnishing services to a tenant of the owner of the residential property to which services were provided, from any subsequent tenant or the property owner. The bill also would prohibit those corporations from demanding or receiving a security deposit in an amount that is more than 2 times the estimated average periodic bill or 3 times the estimated average monthly bill for the provision of services and would prohibit those corporations from imposing a reconnection charge for terminated service if the customer provides that security deposit. (4) Existing law requires the decision of a publicly owned utility to require a new residential applicant to deposit a sum of money with the publicly owned utility prior to furnishing service to be based solely upon the creditworthiness of the applicant, as determined by the public utility. Existing law limits the amount of money that a publicly owned utility may demand or receive from a customer as security for the provision of services. This bill would prohibit a publicly owned utility from demanding or receiving a charge for reconnecting service terminated for nonpayment if the customer posts that security. By imposing new duties on publicly owned utilities, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (5) Under existing law, a violation of any provision of the Public Utilities Act or of any rules or orders issued under the act, is a crime. By imposing new requirements under the act, the violation of which is a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (6) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
- Who sponsors AB 771?
- AB 771 is sponsored by De Leon and Torres.
- What is the current status of AB 771?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 771?
- Track AB 771 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 771
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 771
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →