AB 2789 — Money transmission.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 612, Statutes of 2010.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 09, 2010. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 6 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law provides for the regulation and licensure by the Commissioner of Financial Institutions of money transmitters, issuers of travelers checks, and sellers of payment instruments. This bill would repeal those provisions and enact the Money Transmission Act, which would provide for the regulation and licensure by the commissioner of persons in the business of money transmission, defined to mean the selling or issuing of payment instruments or stored value and the receiving of money for transmission. The bill would prohibit a person from engaging in the business of money transmission in California or advertising, soliciting, or holding itself out as providing money transmission unless licensed by the commissioner or exempt from licensure. The bill would provide that only a corporation or limited liability company may be licensed to engage in the business of money transmission. The bill would require specified information to be included in an application for a license. The bill would authorize the commissioner to conduct an examination of an applicant, at the applicant's expense, and would require the commissioner to approve an application for a license if the commissioner makes specified findings, including that the applicant has adequate tangible shareholders' equity, as defined, and is competent to engage in the business of money transmission. The bill would require licensees to file with the commissioner audit reports within 90 days after the end of each fiscal year and other specified reports each calendar quarter. The bill would impose various fees and would require the commissioner to levy assessments on licensees for the purposes of administering these provisions regulating money transmission. The bill would establish requirements in order for a licensee to appoint an agent to conduct money transmission on behalf of the licensee. The bill would require a licensee to maintain eligible securities, as defined, meeting specified requirements. The bill would authorize the commissioner to issue an order requiring the licensee to maintain and obtain specified securities if the commissioner finds that the financial condition of a licensee is unstable, as specified. The bill would require a licensee to provide specified notices and disclosures to customers, including a notice relative to a customer's right to a refund, disclosures relating to rates of exchange, a notice indicating that payment instruments are not insured, and a notice providing information on making complaints to the commissioner against a licensee. The bill would require licensees to maintain certain financial records for a 3-year period. The bill would authorize the commissioner to examine the business and office of a licensee and to suspend or revoke a license if the commissioner finds that a licensee or agent of a licensee has, among other things, violated the provisions of the act or engaged in fraud or unsound practices and would authorize the commissioner to assess specified civil penalties against a person that violates these provisions. The bill would also make it a crime for a person to engage in the business of money transmission without a license or an exemption from licensure or for a person to intentionally make a false statement, misrepresentation, or false certification in a record filed or required to be maintained under these provisions. By establishing new crimes, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/30/10 - Chaptered Current pdf September 30, 2010
- Enrolled 08/30/10 - Enrolled pdf August 30, 2010
- Amended 07/15/10 - Amended Senate pdf July 15, 2010
- Amended 06/10/10 - Amended Senate pdf June 10, 2010
- Amended 04/12/10 - Amended Assembly pdf April 12, 2010
- Introduced 03/09/10 - Introduced pdf March 09, 2010
- AB2789 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 612, Statutes of 2010.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and to the Governor at 12:15 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 71. Noes 4. Page 6422.)
-
Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Page 6373.)
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 20 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Assembly. (Ayes 33. Noes 1. Page 4584.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
(Corrected July 15.)
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 30).
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B., F. & I.
-
Referred to Com. on B., F. & I.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 68. Noes 5. Page 5030.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 14. Noes 1.) (April 28).
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 11. Noes 1.) (April 19).
-
Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on B. & F. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on B. & F.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee April 9.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Committee on Banking and Finance · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Committee on Banking and Finance
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 77 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 82 | 4 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 4% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Not Voting |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Silva | — | Not Voting |
| Smyth | — | Not Voting |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Not Voting |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 31 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 34 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 87% | 3% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Not Voting |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Wiggins | — | Not Voting |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 0% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Not Voting |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 74 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 80 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 5% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Bass | — | Not Voting |
| DeVore | — | Not Voting |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Not Voting |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Not Voting |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Not Voting |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 15 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 15 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 79% | 5% | 0% | 16% |
How each member voted (19)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Not Voting |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Not Voting |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 8% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (12)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2789 do?
- Existing law provides for the regulation and licensure by the Commissioner of Financial Institutions of money transmitters, issuers of travelers checks, and sellers of payment instruments. This bill would repeal those provisions and enact the Money Transmission Act, which would provide for the regulation and licensure by the commissioner of persons in the business of money transmission, defined to mean the selling or issuing of payment instruments or stored value and the receiving of money for transmission. The bill would prohibit a person from engaging in the business of money transmission in California or advertising, soliciting, or holding itself out as providing money transmission unless licensed by the commissioner or exempt from licensure. The bill would provide that only a corporation or limited liability company may be licensed to engage in the business of money transmission. The bill would require specified information to be included in an application for a license. The bill would authorize the commissioner to conduct an examination of an applicant, at the applicant's expense, and would require the commissioner to approve an application for a license if the commissioner makes specified findings, including that the applicant has adequate tangible shareholders' equity, as defined, and is competent to engage in the business of money transmission. The bill would require licensees to file with the commissioner audit reports within 90 days after the end of each fiscal year and other specified reports each calendar quarter. The bill would impose various fees and would require the commissioner to levy assessments on licensees for the purposes of administering these provisions regulating money transmission. The bill would establish requirements in order for a licensee to appoint an agent to conduct money transmission on behalf of the licensee. The bill would require a licensee to maintain eligible securities, as defined, meeting specified requirements. The bill would authorize the commissioner to issue an order requiring the licensee to maintain and obtain specified securities if the commissioner finds that the financial condition of a licensee is unstable, as specified. The bill would require a licensee to provide specified notices and disclosures to customers, including a notice relative to a customer's right to a refund, disclosures relating to rates of exchange, a notice indicating that payment instruments are not insured, and a notice providing information on making complaints to the commissioner against a licensee. The bill would require licensees to maintain certain financial records for a 3-year period. The bill would authorize the commissioner to examine the business and office of a licensee and to suspend or revoke a license if the commissioner finds that a licensee or agent of a licensee has, among other things, violated the provisions of the act or engaged in fraud or unsound practices and would authorize the commissioner to assess specified civil penalties against a person that violates these provisions. The bill would also make it a crime for a person to engage in the business of money transmission without a license or an exemption from licensure or for a person to intentionally make a false statement, misrepresentation, or false certification in a record filed or required to be maintained under these provisions. By establishing new crimes, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 2789?
- AB 2789 is sponsored by Committee on Banking and Finance.
- What is the current status of AB 2789?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 09, 2010. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 2789?
- Track AB 2789 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2789
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2789
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →