Judiciary.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 75 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 75.
You're tracking SB 75
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 75 — Judiciary.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 342, Statutes of 2009.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
(1) The Public Employees' Retirement System provides pension benefits based in part upon credited service. The Public Employees' Retirement Law provides that credit for service generally is accrued based upon service rendered and compensated in a fiscal year, and that time during which a member is absent without compensation is not allowed for computing service. Existing law, in effect until July 1, 2010, authorizes the Judicial Council to provide that the courts be closed for the transaction of judicial business for one day per month, which would be treated as a holiday, and to adopt court rules to implement these provisions, subject to specified conditions. This bill would require that, for all retirement purposes, credit for service and compensation earnable for members of the Public Employees' Retirement System employed by a trial court that are subject to mandatory furloughs be based on the amount that would have been credited had the employee not been subject to mandatory furloughs. The bill would define mandatory furloughs and trial court employee in these regards. (2) Existing law sets the fees for filing first papers and other filing fees in civil actions, including various probate proceedings. This bill would make technical, conforming changes in related provisions specifying the distribution of the proceeds of those fees. (3) Existing law authorizes a court to use electronic recording equipment for the internal personnel purpose of monitoring judicial officer performance, if notice is provided to litigants that the proceeding may be recorded for that purpose, as specified. This bill would modify that provision to authorize a court to use electronic recording equipment for the internal personnel purpose of monitoring the performance of subordinate judicial officers, hearing officers, and temporary judges while proceedings are conducted in the courtroom, if notice is provided to the subordinate judicial officer, hearing officer, or temporary judge, and to the litigants, that the proceeding may be recorded for that purpose, as specified. (4) Existing law permits the referral of fines, state or local penalties, forfeitures, restitution fines, or restitution orders imposed by specified courts upon a person for criminal offenses under certain conditions to the Franchise Tax Board for collection. Existing law requires a board of supervisors to provide that disbursements of amounts collected by the Franchise Tax Board be made in accordance with specified priorities of payment. Existing law provides, until January 1, 2012, that any statute that takes effect after January 1, 2009, that increases the amount of any item that would be subject to disbursement under these provisions shall not be disbursed until all specified reimbursable costs have been disbursed. Existing law imposes a fee of $30, until July 1, 2011, and thereafter, a fee of $20, upon every conviction for a criminal offense, other than parking offenses, for funding of court security. This bill would provide that the court security fees collected pursuant to the latter provision shall be disbursed in accordance with the specified priorities of payment described above, and not first be subject to disbursement for those specified reimbursable costs.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/11/09 - Chaptered Current pdf October 11, 2009
- Enrolled 09/11/09 - Enrolled pdf September 11, 2009
- Amended 09/04/09 - Amended Assembly pdf September 04, 2009
- Introduced 01/20/09 - Introduced pdf January 20, 2009
- SB75 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 342, Statutes of 2009.
-
Approved by Governor.
-
Enrolled. To Governor at 11 a.m.
-
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 33. Noes 4. Page 2367.) To enrollment.
-
In Senate. To unfinished business.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 58. Noes 14. Page 3073.) To Senate.
-
Read third time. Amended. (Page 3040.) To third reading.
-
From inactive file to third reading file.
-
Notice of motion to remove from inactive file given by Assembly Member Torrico.
-
Placed on inactive file on request of Assembly Member Krekorian.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
Placed on second reading file.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 22. Noes 14. Page 513.) To Assembly.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
Placed on second reading file.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
To Com. on RLS.
-
Read first time.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after February 20.
-
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 32 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 34 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 83% | 10% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (41)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Nay |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Florez | — | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 60 | 17 | 0 | 8 |
| Republican | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 65 | 18 | 0 | 8 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 20% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Nay |
| Manuel | — | Nay |
| Perez | — | Nay |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Not Voting |
| Fletcher | — | Not Voting |
| Conway | — | Not Voting |
| Villines | — | Nay |
| Adams | — | Not Voting |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Not Voting |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Not Voting |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Garrick | — | Not Voting |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 21 | 13 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 23 | 14 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 58% | 35% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Hollingsworth | — | Nay |
| Cedillo | — | Not Voting |
| Cogdill | — | Nay |
| Maldonado | — | Not Voting |
| Ashburn | — | Nay |
| Benoit | — | Nay |
| Cox | — | Nay |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Nay |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 75 do?
- (1) The Public Employees' Retirement System provides pension benefits based in part upon credited service. The Public Employees' Retirement Law provides that credit for service generally is accrued based upon service rendered and compensated in a fiscal year, and that time during which a member is absent without compensation is not allowed for computing service. Existing law, in effect until July 1, 2010, authorizes the Judicial Council to provide that the courts be closed for the transaction of judicial business for one day per month, which would be treated as a holiday, and to adopt court rules to implement these provisions, subject to specified conditions. This bill would require that, for all retirement purposes, credit for service and compensation earnable for members of the Public Employees' Retirement System employed by a trial court that are subject to mandatory furloughs be based on the amount that would have been credited had the employee not been subject to mandatory furloughs. The bill would define mandatory furloughs and trial court employee in these regards. (2) Existing law sets the fees for filing first papers and other filing fees in civil actions, including various probate proceedings. This bill would make technical, conforming changes in related provisions specifying the distribution of the proceeds of those fees. (3) Existing law authorizes a court to use electronic recording equipment for the internal personnel purpose of monitoring judicial officer performance, if notice is provided to litigants that the proceeding may be recorded for that purpose, as specified. This bill would modify that provision to authorize a court to use electronic recording equipment for the internal personnel purpose of monitoring the performance of subordinate judicial officers, hearing officers, and temporary judges while proceedings are conducted in the courtroom, if notice is provided to the subordinate judicial officer, hearing officer, or temporary judge, and to the litigants, that the proceeding may be recorded for that purpose, as specified. (4) Existing law permits the referral of fines, state or local penalties, forfeitures, restitution fines, or restitution orders imposed by specified courts upon a person for criminal offenses under certain conditions to the Franchise Tax Board for collection. Existing law requires a board of supervisors to provide that disbursements of amounts collected by the Franchise Tax Board be made in accordance with specified priorities of payment. Existing law provides, until January 1, 2012, that any statute that takes effect after January 1, 2009, that increases the amount of any item that would be subject to disbursement under these provisions shall not be disbursed until all specified reimbursable costs have been disbursed. Existing law imposes a fee of $30, until July 1, 2011, and thereafter, a fee of $20, upon every conviction for a criminal offense, other than parking offenses, for funding of court security. This bill would provide that the court security fees collected pursuant to the latter provision shall be disbursed in accordance with the specified priorities of payment described above, and not first be subject to disbursement for those specified reimbursable costs.
- Who sponsors SB 75?
- SB 75 is sponsored by Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review.
- What is the current status of SB 75?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 75?
- Track SB 75 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 75
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 75
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →