California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: Passed Assembly

AB 1853 — Corcoran District Hospital: design-build.

Last action — Read third time, passage refused. (Ayes 13. Noes 10. Page 5119.)

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law provides for local health care districts that are authorized to own and operate certain health facilities, including hospitals. Each health care district has specific duties and powers respecting the creation, administration, and maintenance of the districts, including to purchase, receive, take, hold, lease, use, and enjoy property of every kind and description of property within the district. Existing law permits the Sonoma Valley Health Care District, upon the approval of its board of directors, to use a prescribed design-build procedure set forth in a specific code section when assigning contracts for the construction of a building and improvements directly related to a hospital or health facility building at the Sonoma Valley Hospital. Under existing law, that code section would be repealed on January 1, 2011, unless that date is deleted or extended. This bill would also allow the Corcoran District Hospital, upon approval by its board of directors, to use the above-mentioned design-build procedure described in that code section to award contracts for the construction of an outpatient care facility , but would make these provisions inoperative if the project does not meet specified requirements. Existing law requires that, under the existing design-build procedure, a health care district would be required to pay a fee into the continuously appropriated State Public Works Enforcement Fund, the moneys in which are used by the Department of Industrial relations to enforce applicable prevailing wage and labor requirements. Because this bill would authorize additional fees to be paid into a continuously appropriated fund, the bill would constitute an appropriation. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Corcoran District Hospital.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Read third time, passage refused. (Ayes 13. Noes 10. Page 5119.)

  2. Ordered to third reading.

  3. Withdrawn from committee.

  4. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  5. (Ayes 23. Noes 9. Page 5117.)

  6. Senate Rule 29.3(b) suspended.

  7. Joint Rule 61(b)(15) suspended. (Page 5108.)

  8. Withdrawn from committee. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  9. In committee: Held under submission.

  10. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR suspense file.

  11. From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 1.) (June 29).

  12. Referred to Com. on G.O.

  13. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  14. Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 47. Noes 25. Page 5527.)

  15. Read second time. To third reading.

  16. Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.

  17. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 28).

  18. In committee: Set, second hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  19. In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  20. From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 4.) (March 23).

  21. Referred to Com. on B. & P.

  22. From printer. May be heard in committee March 18.

  23. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • De La Torre · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 5 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • De La Torre

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

W/O REF. TO FILE AB1853 De La Torre

Failed 14 Yea · 10 Nay · 16 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 148015
Democratic 0200
Republican 0001
Total 1410016
% of votes cast 35%25%0%40%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Nay
Hancock — Nay
Negrete — Yea
Florez — Yea
Lowenthal — Nay
Cedillo — Yea
Cogdill — Not Voting
Harman — Yea
Runner — Not Voting
Hollingsworth — Yea
Huff — Not Voting
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Nay
McLeod — Yea
Oropeza — Not Voting
Ashburn — Not Voting
Ducheny — Not Voting
Dutton — Not Voting
Pavley — Not Voting
Romero — Yea
Walters — Not Voting
Wolk — Nay
Wright — Yea
Aanestad — Not Voting
Alquist — Yea
Blakeslee — Not Voting
Liu — Nay
Price — Not Voting
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wiggins — Not Voting
Wyland — Not Voting
Corbett — Nay
Emmerson — Yea
Correa — Yea
DeSaulnier — Nay
Denham — Not Voting
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Nay
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Nay
Strickland, Tony Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Placed on Appropriations Suspense file.

Passed 10 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 10001
Total 10001
% of votes cast 91%0%0%9%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Leno — Yea
Ashburn — Yea
Price — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Walters — Not Voting
Wolk — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Emmerson — Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations.

Passed 8 Yea · 1 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6103
Democratic 2000
Total 8103
% of votes cast 67%8%0%25%
How each member voted (12)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Florez — Yea
Harman — Nay
Oropeza — Not Voting
Wright — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Price — Yea
Wyland — Not Voting
Denham — Not Voting
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

AB 1853 HUFFMAN Assembly Third Reading

Passed 55 Yea · 26 Nay · 10 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 522508
Democratic 2001
Republican 1101
Total 5526010
% of votes cast 60%29%0%11%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Yea
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Nay
Evans — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Furutani — Yea
Gilmore — Nay
Hagman — Nay
Harkey — Nay
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Cook — Nay
Coto — Yea
Bill — Nay
Hayashi — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huber — Yea
Jeffries — Nay
Fletcher — Nay
Anderson — Nay
Bass — Yea
Blakeslee — Nay
Davis — Yea
DeVore — Nay
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nava — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Tom — Not Voting
Charles — Not Voting
Audra — Not Voting
Galgiani — Not Voting
Lieu — Not Voting
Miller — Nay
Nestande — Not Voting
Norby — Not Voting
Silva — Nay
Smyth — Nay
Villines — Nay
Adams — Nay
Ammiano — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Knight — Nay
Logue — Nay
Ma — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Tran — Nay
Emmerson — Nay
Eng — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Garrick — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Strickland, Tony Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 13 Yea · 5 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 12500
Democratic 1000
Total 13500
% of votes cast 72%28%0%0%
How each member voted (18)
Member Party Vote
Charles — Yea
Monning — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Conway — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Norby — Nay
Torrico — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Miller — Nay
Ruskin — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Coto — Yea
Davis — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

healthcare labor
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 1853 do?
Existing law provides for local health care districts that are authorized to own and operate certain health facilities, including hospitals. Each health care district has specific duties and powers respecting the creation, administration, and maintenance of the districts, including to purchase, receive, take, hold, lease, use, and enjoy property of every kind and description of property within the district. Existing law permits the Sonoma Valley Health Care District, upon the approval of its board of directors, to use a prescribed design-build procedure set forth in a specific code section when assigning contracts for the construction of a building and improvements directly related to a hospital or health facility building at the Sonoma Valley Hospital. Under existing law, that code section would be repealed on January 1, 2011, unless that date is deleted or extended. This bill would also allow the Corcoran District Hospital, upon approval by its board of directors, to use the above-mentioned design-build procedure described in that code section to award contracts for the construction of an outpatient care facility , but would make these provisions inoperative if the project does not meet specified requirements. Existing law requires that, under the existing design-build procedure, a health care district would be required to pay a fee into the continuously appropriated State Public Works Enforcement Fund, the moneys in which are used by the Department of Industrial relations to enforce applicable prevailing wage and labor requirements. Because this bill would authorize additional fees to be paid into a continuously appropriated fund, the bill would constitute an appropriation. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Corcoran District Hospital.
Who sponsors AB 1853?
AB 1853 is sponsored by De La Torre.
What is the current status of AB 1853?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 1853?
Track AB 1853 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 1853

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 1853

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →