SB 106 — Local agencies: ethics training.
Last action — From Assembly without further action.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law requires all local agency officials to receive training in ethics, at specified intervals, if the local agency provides any type of compensation, salary, or stipend to those officials. Existing law defines "local agency," for these purposes, to mean a city, county, city and county, charter city, charter county, charter city and county, or special district. This bill would include a community college district, county board of education, and school district in the definition of "local agency." The bill would also require local agency officials who serve a community college district, county board of education, or school district as of January 1, 2010, to receive the ethics training required by specified law before January 1, 2011, and at least every 2 years thereafter, except as specified.
Bill Text
- Amended 06/25/09 - Amended Assembly Current pdf June 25, 2009
- Introduced 01/27/09 - Introduced pdf January 27, 2009
- SB106 View text html
Action History
-
From Assembly without further action.
-
From committee without further action.
-
Set, second hearing. Held in committee and under submission.
-
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
(Heard in committee on June 17.)
-
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.)
-
To Coms. on ED. and APPR.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 33. Noes 0. Page 286.) To Assembly.
-
Read second time. To Consent Calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 255.)
-
Set for hearing March 4.
-
To Com. on L. GOV.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after February 27.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Committee on Local Government · Primary
- Florez · Cosponsor
- Huber · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 119 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Committee on Local Government
Co-sponsors (2)
- Florez
- Huber
Not signed on (119)
119 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 119 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 0% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Not Voting |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 30 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 34 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 85% | 0% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Not Voting |
| Simitian | — | Not Voting |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Not Voting |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 106 do?
- Existing law requires all local agency officials to receive training in ethics, at specified intervals, if the local agency provides any type of compensation, salary, or stipend to those officials. Existing law defines "local agency," for these purposes, to mean a city, county, city and county, charter city, charter county, charter city and county, or special district. This bill would include a community college district, county board of education, and school district in the definition of "local agency." The bill would also require local agency officials who serve a community college district, county board of education, or school district as of January 1, 2010, to receive the ethics training required by specified law before January 1, 2011, and at least every 2 years thereafter, except as specified.
- Who sponsors SB 106?
- SB 106 is sponsored by Committee on Local Government, Florez, and Huber.
- What is the current status of SB 106?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 106?
- Track SB 106 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 106
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 106
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →