Child support: compromise of arrears.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 696 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 696.
You're tracking SB 696
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 696 — Child support: compromise of arrears.
Last action — From Assembly without further action.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law establishes a statewide compromise of arrears program pursuant to which the Department of Child Support Services may accept offers in compromise of child support arrears and interest accrued thereon owed to the state for reimbursement of aid paid pursuant to the California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids Act. An offer in compromise must be rescinded and any compromised liability reestablished unless there is a finding of good cause or a determination by the director that it is in the best interest of the state to do otherwise. Existing law provides that the acceptance of an offer in compromise is deemed to be in the best interest of the state with regard to arrears that accrued as a result of a decrease in income when an obligor was a reservist or member of the National Guard activated to United States military service, and failed to modify the support order to reflect the reduction in income. This bill would provide that acceptance of an offer in compromise is deemed to be in the best interest of the state with regard to arrears that accrued as a result of a decrease in income when the obligor failed to modify the support order to reflect the reduction in income when an obligor was a reservist or member of the National Guard activated to United States military service, when the obligor was incarcerated for more than 90 days and does not have other sources of income, when the obligor's sole income was based on specified forms of public assistance, or when the obligor was receiving inpatient services in a medical facility for more than 90 days and does not have other sources of income.
Bill Text
- Amended 06/03/10 - Amended Assembly Current pdf June 03, 2010
- Amended 09/01/09 - Amended Senate pdf September 01, 2009
- Amended 06/17/09 - Amended Senate pdf June 17, 2009
- Amended 06/09/09 - Amended Senate pdf June 09, 2009
- Amended 05/05/09 - Amended Senate pdf May 05, 2009
- Amended 04/13/09 - Amended Senate pdf April 13, 2009
- Introduced 02/27/09 - Introduced pdf February 27, 2009
- SB696 View text html
Action History
-
From Assembly without further action.
-
From committee without further action.
-
Hearing postponed by committee.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
To Com. on JUD.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 31. Noes 2. Page 2120.) To Assembly.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 1987.)
-
Set for hearing August 26.
-
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on EQ.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on EQ. (Ayes 6. Noes 3. Page 1340.)
-
Set for hearing June 16.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
-
Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
-
Set for hearing May 12.
-
Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Set for hearing May 5.
-
Re-referred to Coms. on E., U., & C. and EQ.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
To Com. on RLS.
-
Read first time.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 30.
-
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Wright · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Wright
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 29 | 2 | 0 | 7 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 32 | 2 | 0 | 7 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 5% | 0% | 17% |
How each member voted (41)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Nay |
| Hancock | — | Not Voting |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Nay |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Ducheny | — | Not Voting |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Not Voting |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Not Voting |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Not Voting |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 6 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 55% | 27% | 0% | 18% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Lowenthal | — | Nay |
| Benoit | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Not Voting |
| Kehoe | — | Nay |
| Simitian | — | Nay |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Not Voting |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 696 do?
- Existing law establishes a statewide compromise of arrears program pursuant to which the Department of Child Support Services may accept offers in compromise of child support arrears and interest accrued thereon owed to the state for reimbursement of aid paid pursuant to the California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids Act. An offer in compromise must be rescinded and any compromised liability reestablished unless there is a finding of good cause or a determination by the director that it is in the best interest of the state to do otherwise. Existing law provides that the acceptance of an offer in compromise is deemed to be in the best interest of the state with regard to arrears that accrued as a result of a decrease in income when an obligor was a reservist or member of the National Guard activated to United States military service, and failed to modify the support order to reflect the reduction in income. This bill would provide that acceptance of an offer in compromise is deemed to be in the best interest of the state with regard to arrears that accrued as a result of a decrease in income when the obligor failed to modify the support order to reflect the reduction in income when an obligor was a reservist or member of the National Guard activated to United States military service, when the obligor was incarcerated for more than 90 days and does not have other sources of income, when the obligor's sole income was based on specified forms of public assistance, or when the obligor was receiving inpatient services in a medical facility for more than 90 days and does not have other sources of income.
- Who sponsors SB 696?
- SB 696 is sponsored by Wright.
- What is the current status of SB 696?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 696?
- Track SB 696 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 696
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 696
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →