Powers of attorney: duties.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 1038 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 1038.
You're tracking SB 1038
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 1038 — Powers of attorney: duties.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 48, Statutes of 2010.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The Power of Attorney Law creates various duties and requires an attorney-in-fact to observe the standard of care that would be observed by a prudent person dealing with property of another, or if an attorney-in-fact has special skills he or she shall observe the standard of care that would be observed by others with similar skills. However, existing law provides that an attorney-in-fact is not liable for a loss to the principal's property if he or she is not compensated, unless the loss results from his or her bad faith, intentional wrongdoing, or gross negligence. This bill would delete the latter provision. The bill would provide that if the attorney-in-fact breaches a duty pursuant to the Power of Attorney Law he or she is chargeable with interest for any loss or depreciation in value of the property, any profit made through the breach, or any profit that would have accrued to the principal if the loss or profit is a result of the breach. This bill would allow the court, in its discretion, to excuse the attorney-in-fact if he or she acted reasonably and in good faith, or if the court finds that an attorney-in-fact acted in bad faith, he or she would be held liable for twice the value of the property recovered.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 07/06/10 - Chaptered Current pdf July 06, 2010
- Enrolled 06/22/10 - Enrolled pdf June 22, 2010
- Amended 04/26/10 - Amended Senate pdf April 26, 2010
- Amended 04/08/10 - Amended Senate pdf April 08, 2010
- Introduced 02/12/10 - Introduced pdf February 12, 2010
- SB1038 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 48, Statutes of 2010.
-
Approved by Governor.
-
Enrolled. To Governor at 2 p.m.
-
In Senate. To enrollment.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 5746.) To Senate.
-
Read second time. To Consent Calendar.
-
(Heard in committee on June 15.)
-
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.)
-
To Com. on JUD.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 31. Noes 0. Page 3519.) To Assembly.
-
Read second time. To Consent Calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 4. Noes 0. Page 3444.)
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
Set for hearing May 4.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
To Com. on JUD.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 15.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Harman · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Harman
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 82 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 87 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 96% | 0% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Not Voting |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Not Voting |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Not Voting |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 30 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 32 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| % of votes cast | 82% | 0% | 0% | 18% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| Corbett | — | Not Voting |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Not Voting |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Not Voting |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 0% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1038 do?
- The Power of Attorney Law creates various duties and requires an attorney-in-fact to observe the standard of care that would be observed by a prudent person dealing with property of another, or if an attorney-in-fact has special skills he or she shall observe the standard of care that would be observed by others with similar skills. However, existing law provides that an attorney-in-fact is not liable for a loss to the principal's property if he or she is not compensated, unless the loss results from his or her bad faith, intentional wrongdoing, or gross negligence. This bill would delete the latter provision. The bill would provide that if the attorney-in-fact breaches a duty pursuant to the Power of Attorney Law he or she is chargeable with interest for any loss or depreciation in value of the property, any profit made through the breach, or any profit that would have accrued to the principal if the loss or profit is a result of the breach. This bill would allow the court, in its discretion, to excuse the attorney-in-fact if he or she acted reasonably and in good faith, or if the court finds that an attorney-in-fact acted in bad faith, he or she would be held liable for twice the value of the property recovered.
- Who sponsors SB 1038?
- SB 1038 is sponsored by Harman.
- What is the current status of SB 1038?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1038?
- Track SB 1038 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1038
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1038
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →