Escrow agents.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 1223 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 1223.
You're tracking SB 1223
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 1223 — Escrow agents.
Last action — Died on file.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law, the Escrow Law, provides for the licensure and regulation by the Commissioner of Corporations of persons engaged in business as escrow agents, unless specifically exempted from licensure. Under the Escrow Law, a "licensee" is defined as any person holding a valid, unrevoked license as an escrow agent, and an "escrow agent" is defined as any person engaged in the business of receiving escrows for deposit or delivery. A willful violation of the Escrow Law constitutes a crime. This bill would require a licensed escrow agent and any person acting as an escrow agent who is exempt from licensure under the Escrow Law to return or cause to be returned to the bidder all deposits and fees received from that bidder in connection with an auction sale of real property that has been the subject of a foreclosure sale, upon receipt of escrow instructions from the bidder and auctioneer or auction company directing the return of all funds placed on deposit by the bidder with that agent or person, except as specified. Existing law requires each person licensed under the Escrow Law to establish a bond with the commissioner and to participate as a member of Fidelity Corporation, a nonprofit mutual benefit corporation, established to indemnify its members against loss. This bill would require the surety or sureties of a bond established by an escrow agent to give notice to the commissioner and to Fidelity Corporation of any release, substitution, cancellation, withdrawal, or nonrenewal of a bond. Because a willful violation of these provisions would constitute a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Enrolled 08/23/10 - Enrolled Current pdf August 23, 2010
- Amended 05/27/10 - Amended Assembly pdf May 27, 2010
- Amended 05/25/10 - Amended Assembly pdf May 25, 2010
- Amended 04/08/10 - Amended Senate pdf April 08, 2010
- Amended 03/22/10 - Amended Senate pdf March 22, 2010
- Introduced 02/18/10 - Introduced pdf February 18, 2010
- SB1223 View text html
Action History
-
Died on file.
-
In Senate. To unfinished business. (Veto)
-
Vetoed by Governor.
-
Enrolled. To Governor at 5 p.m.
-
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 4651.) To enrollment.
-
In Senate. To unfinished business.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 6180.) To Senate.
-
Read second time. To Consent Calendar.
-
(Heard in committee on August 4.)
-
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.)
-
(Heard in committee on June 29.)
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
(Heard in committee on June 21.)
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
Hearing postponed by committee.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.
-
To Coms. on B. & F. and JUD.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 33. Noes 0. Page 3379.) To Assembly.
-
Read second time. To Consent Calendar.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and be placed on Consent Calendar.
-
Set for hearing April 26.
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 4. Noes 0. Page 3184.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing April 13.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on B., F. & I.
-
Set for hearing April 7.
-
To Coms. on B., F. & I. and JUD.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 21.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Calderon · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Calderon
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 33 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 36 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Wiggins | — | Not Voting |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 84 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 90 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 99% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Not Voting |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (19)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (12)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Not Voting |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 32 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 34 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 87% | 0% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Not Voting |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Not Voting |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Not Voting |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Not Voting |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 0% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 82% | 0% | 0% | 18% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Not Voting |
| Cox | — | Not Voting |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1223 do?
- Existing law, the Escrow Law, provides for the licensure and regulation by the Commissioner of Corporations of persons engaged in business as escrow agents, unless specifically exempted from licensure. Under the Escrow Law, a "licensee" is defined as any person holding a valid, unrevoked license as an escrow agent, and an "escrow agent" is defined as any person engaged in the business of receiving escrows for deposit or delivery. A willful violation of the Escrow Law constitutes a crime. This bill would require a licensed escrow agent and any person acting as an escrow agent who is exempt from licensure under the Escrow Law to return or cause to be returned to the bidder all deposits and fees received from that bidder in connection with an auction sale of real property that has been the subject of a foreclosure sale, upon receipt of escrow instructions from the bidder and auctioneer or auction company directing the return of all funds placed on deposit by the bidder with that agent or person, except as specified. Existing law requires each person licensed under the Escrow Law to establish a bond with the commissioner and to participate as a member of Fidelity Corporation, a nonprofit mutual benefit corporation, established to indemnify its members against loss. This bill would require the surety or sureties of a bond established by an escrow agent to give notice to the commissioner and to Fidelity Corporation of any release, substitution, cancellation, withdrawal, or nonrenewal of a bond. Because a willful violation of these provisions would constitute a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors SB 1223?
- SB 1223 is sponsored by Calderon.
- What is the current status of SB 1223?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1223?
- Track SB 1223 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1223
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1223
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →