California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: Passed Assembly

AB 315 — Public resources: Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy: Los Angeles River parkway projects.

Last action — From Senate committee without further action.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law establishes the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy in the Natural Resources Agency and specifies the authority and purposes of the conservancy. This bill would require the conservancy to develop a feasibility study on or before June 30, 2012, for the creation of Los Angeles River parkway projects in, and adjacent to, the Los Angeles State Historic Park and Rio de Los Angeles State Park (Bowtie Parcel) . The bill would require the study to include, among other things, objectives for extending regional wildlife linkages and exploring river recreational activities. The bill would require the conservancy to develop the study with community input and to request voluntary cooperation of other governmental authorities with jurisdiction in the parks. The bill would also require the conservancy to use existing budget resources, and authorize the conservancy to use funds received from private and nonprofit sources in preparing the study. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From Senate committee without further action.

  2. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  3. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  4. Referred to Com. on RLS.

  5. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  6. Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 47. Noes 30. Page 2044.)

  7. Read second time. To third reading.

  8. Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.

  9. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 28).

  10. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  11. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  12. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.

  13. From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 8. Noes 2.) (April 29).

  14. Re-referred to Com. on ED.

  15. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.

  16. Referred to Com. on ED.

  17. From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.

  18. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • De Leon · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • De Leon

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 56 Yea · 33 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 523103
Democratic 3000
Republican 1200
Total 563303
% of votes cast 61%36%0%3%
How each member voted (92)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Yea
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Charles — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Yamada — Not Voting
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Conway — Nay
Cook — Nay
DeVore — Nay
Bill — Nay
Tom — Nay
Evans — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Fletcher — Nay
Audra — Nay
Galgiani — Yea
Gilmore — Nay
Hagman — Nay
Bass — Yea
Duvall — Nay
Harkey — Nay
Hayashi — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huber — Nay
Jeffries — Nay
Knight — Nay
Lieu — Yea
Logue — Nay
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Nay
Nava — Yea
Nestande — Nay
Price — Not Voting
Ruskin — Yea
Silva — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Villines — Nay
Adams — Nay
Anderson — Nay
Beall — Yea
Blakeslee — Nay
Block — Not Voting
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Krekorian — Yea
Ma — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Smyth — Nay
Torlakson — Yea
Tran — Nay
Emmerson — Nay
Coto — Yea
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Davis — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Garrick — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 16 Yea · 6 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 15500
Democratic 1000
Republican 0100
Total 16600
% of votes cast 73%27%0%0%
How each member voted (22)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Charles — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Audra — Nay
Duvall — Nay
Miller — Nay
Price — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Krekorian — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Davis — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 315 do?
Existing law establishes the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy in the Natural Resources Agency and specifies the authority and purposes of the conservancy. This bill would require the conservancy to develop a feasibility study on or before June 30, 2012, for the creation of Los Angeles River parkway projects in, and adjacent to, the Los Angeles State Historic Park and Rio de Los Angeles State Park (Bowtie Parcel) . The bill would require the study to include, among other things, objectives for extending regional wildlife linkages and exploring river recreational activities. The bill would require the conservancy to develop the study with community input and to request voluntary cooperation of other governmental authorities with jurisdiction in the parks. The bill would also require the conservancy to use existing budget resources, and authorize the conservancy to use funds received from private and nonprofit sources in preparing the study. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Who sponsors AB 315?
AB 315 is sponsored by De Leon.
What is the current status of AB 315?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 315?
Track AB 315 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 315

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 315

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →