Public resources: Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy: Los Angeles River parkway projects.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 315 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 315.
You're tracking AB 315
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 315 — Public resources: Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy: Los Angeles River parkway projects.
Last action — From Senate committee without further action.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law establishes the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy in the Natural Resources Agency and specifies the authority and purposes of the conservancy. This bill would require the conservancy to develop a feasibility study on or before June 30, 2012, for the creation of Los Angeles River parkway projects in, and adjacent to, the Los Angeles State Historic Park and Rio de Los Angeles State Park (Bowtie Parcel) . The bill would require the study to include, among other things, objectives for extending regional wildlife linkages and exploring river recreational activities. The bill would require the conservancy to develop the study with community input and to request voluntary cooperation of other governmental authorities with jurisdiction in the parks. The bill would also require the conservancy to use existing budget resources, and authorize the conservancy to use funds received from private and nonprofit sources in preparing the study. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill Text
- Amended 08/19/10 - Amended Senate Current pdf August 19, 2010
- Amended 06/21/10 - Amended Senate pdf June 21, 2010
- Amended 06/01/09 - Amended Assembly pdf June 01, 2009
- Amended 05/06/09 - Amended Assembly pdf May 06, 2009
- Amended 04/14/09 - Amended Assembly pdf April 14, 2009
- Introduced 02/18/09 - Introduced pdf February 18, 2009
- AB315 View text html
Action History
-
From Senate committee without further action.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Referred to Com. on RLS.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 47. Noes 30. Page 2044.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 28).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 8. Noes 2.) (April 29).
-
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on ED.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- De Leon · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- De Leon
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 52 | 31 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 56 | 33 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 61% | 36% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (92)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Not Voting |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Bill | — | Nay |
| Tom | — | Nay |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Nay |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Nay |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Nay |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Price | — | Not Voting |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Nay |
| Adams | — | Nay |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Block | — | Not Voting |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Nay |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Nay |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 15 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 27% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (22)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Duvall | — | Nay |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 18% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Not Voting |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 315 do?
- Existing law establishes the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy in the Natural Resources Agency and specifies the authority and purposes of the conservancy. This bill would require the conservancy to develop a feasibility study on or before June 30, 2012, for the creation of Los Angeles River parkway projects in, and adjacent to, the Los Angeles State Historic Park and Rio de Los Angeles State Park (Bowtie Parcel) . The bill would require the study to include, among other things, objectives for extending regional wildlife linkages and exploring river recreational activities. The bill would require the conservancy to develop the study with community input and to request voluntary cooperation of other governmental authorities with jurisdiction in the parks. The bill would also require the conservancy to use existing budget resources, and authorize the conservancy to use funds received from private and nonprofit sources in preparing the study. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
- Who sponsors AB 315?
- AB 315 is sponsored by De Leon.
- What is the current status of AB 315?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 315?
- Track AB 315 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 315
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 315
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →