SB 239 — Mortgage fraud.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 174, Statutes of 2009.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law provides that a person, other than the loan applicant, who makes false financial statements in connection with an application for a loan to be secured by real property is guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine not exceeding $10,000, by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or by both the fine and imprisonment; and by restitution to the victim, as specified. This bill would delete this provision and provide instead for the offense of mortgage fraud, as defined, a violation of which would be a public offense punishable by imprisonment in the state prison or in a county jail for not more than one year. The bill would provide that mortgage fraud may only be prosecuted when the value of the alleged fraud meets the threshold for grand theft, as specified. The bill would set forth legislative findings, declarations, and intent with respect to its enactment. By revising existing crimes and creating new crimes, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/11/09 - Chaptered Current pdf October 11, 2009
- Enrolled 08/18/09 - Enrolled pdf August 18, 2009
- Amended 05/05/09 - Amended Senate pdf May 05, 2009
- Amended 04/15/09 - Amended Senate pdf April 15, 2009
- Introduced 02/24/09 - Introduced pdf February 24, 2009
- SB239 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 174, Statutes of 2009.
-
Approved by Governor.
-
Enrolled. To Governor at 11 a.m.
-
Ordered held in Engrossing and Enrolling.
-
Returned by the Governor at the request of the Senate.
-
Enrolled. To Governor at 1 p.m.
-
In Senate. To enrollment.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 2613.) To Senate.
-
From Consent Calendar to third reading.
-
Read second time. To Consent Calendar.
-
(Heard in committee on July 8.)
-
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.)
-
(Heard in committee on June 23.)
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
To Com. on PUB. S.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 1011.) To Assembly.
-
To Special Consent Calendar.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
Set for hearing May 18.
-
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 704.)
-
Set for hearing April 28.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Set for hearing April 21.
-
To Com. on PUB. S.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 27.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Hancock · Cosponsor
- Pavley · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Pavley
Co-sponsors (1)
- Hancock
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 82 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 87 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 96% | 0% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Not Voting |
| Charles | — | Not Voting |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Not Voting |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 18 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 20 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (21)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Not Voting |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 36 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 239 do?
- Existing law provides that a person, other than the loan applicant, who makes false financial statements in connection with an application for a loan to be secured by real property is guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine not exceeding $10,000, by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or by both the fine and imprisonment; and by restitution to the victim, as specified. This bill would delete this provision and provide instead for the offense of mortgage fraud, as defined, a violation of which would be a public offense punishable by imprisonment in the state prison or in a county jail for not more than one year. The bill would provide that mortgage fraud may only be prosecuted when the value of the alleged fraud meets the threshold for grand theft, as specified. The bill would set forth legislative findings, declarations, and intent with respect to its enactment. By revising existing crimes and creating new crimes, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors SB 239?
- SB 239 is sponsored by Hancock and Pavley.
- What is the current status of SB 239?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 239?
- Track SB 239 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 239
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 239
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →