California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: In Committee

AB 683 — Local educational agencies: program improvement.

Last action — From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law, implementing federal requirements under the federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, provides that a local educational agency identified for corrective action shall be subject to specified sanctions and may apply for a one-year, nonrenewable grant of federal improvement funding to assist in its improvement process. Existing law provides that the amount of the grant shall be based upon whether the agency has extensive and severe, moderate, or minor or isolated performance problems, and the number of schools in the local educational agency identified for program improvement pursuant to federal law. This bill would specify that the amount of a grant for a local educational agency that is identified for corrective action and subject to sanctions, that does not have a school identified for program improvement pursuant to federal law, shall be based on the overall proportion of schools identified for program improvement of all local educational agencies determined to be within one of 3 categories, multiplied by the number of schools in the local educational agency, multiplied by the grant amount that would be appropriate to the local educational agency based upon the pervasiveness and severity of its performance problems, as specified. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

  2. Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.

  3. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  4. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  5. Read second time and amended.

  6. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (April 29).

  7. Referred to Com. on ED.

  8. From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.

  9. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Chesbro · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Chesbro

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 11 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 10000
Democratic 1000
Total 11000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Carter — Yea
Eng — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Miller — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 683 do?
Existing law, implementing federal requirements under the federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, provides that a local educational agency identified for corrective action shall be subject to specified sanctions and may apply for a one-year, nonrenewable grant of federal improvement funding to assist in its improvement process. Existing law provides that the amount of the grant shall be based upon whether the agency has extensive and severe, moderate, or minor or isolated performance problems, and the number of schools in the local educational agency identified for program improvement pursuant to federal law. This bill would specify that the amount of a grant for a local educational agency that is identified for corrective action and subject to sanctions, that does not have a school identified for program improvement pursuant to federal law, shall be based on the overall proportion of schools identified for program improvement of all local educational agencies determined to be within one of 3 categories, multiplied by the number of schools in the local educational agency, multiplied by the grant amount that would be appropriate to the local educational agency based upon the pervasiveness and severity of its performance problems, as specified. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Who sponsors AB 683?
AB 683 is sponsored by Chesbro.
What is the current status of AB 683?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 683?
Track AB 683 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 683

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 683

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →