California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: To Executive

SB 676 — Local fees.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 606, Statutes of 2009.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

(1) Existing law, the Uniform Federal Lien Registration Act, governs the filing of notices of liens, certificates, and other notices affecting federal tax liens or other federal liens. The act requires a filing officer to issue, upon request, a certificate showing whether there is on file any notice of a federal lien or certificate or notice affecting any federal lien filed pursuant to the act or as specified. If the filing officer is a county recorder, the fee set by the filing officer may not exceed $15 for a certificate for each name searched. This bill would delete the limitation on the fee that may be charged by a county recorder acting as a filing officer for purposes of the act. (2) Existing law authorizes the county recorder of each county to charge a fee of $4 for the first page and $3 for each additional page for recording and indexing every instrument, paper, or notice required or permitted to be recorded, as specified. This bill would increase the maximum fee for the first page to $10, and would make other conforming changes. (3) Under existing law, every defendant, when represented by appointed counsel, is required to be assessed a registration fee not to exceed $25, but the fee is not required of any defendant that is financially unable to pay it. Under existing law, these provisions are operative in a county only upon the adoption of a resolution by the board of supervisors electing to establish the registration fee. This bill would increase the maximum amount for that registration fee to $50. (4) Existing law limits the fees that a court, county, or city, as applicable, may charge for various costs related to the judgment and execution of criminal matters, including certain administrative costs, costs related to collecting restitution or to probation supervision, certain costs of conducting a criminal investigation, and costs related to providing specified court services, such as a petition for changing a plea or for an order sealing a record. Existing law also limits the fee that a local agency may charge for taking fingerprints for licensing, employment, or certification to an amount not to exceed $10. This bill would increase the maximum fee for administrative costs of collection from 10% to 15%, and for other fees would delete those limits on the maximum fees that may be charged for providing those services pursuant to those provisions, as specified. This bill would also establish a fee to process installment payments, which would not exceed the administrative and clerical costs, and shall not exceed $75, as provided. Additionally, the bill would increase the maximum fee for changing a plea or setting aside a verdict from $120 to $150. (5) Existing law authorizes a county to levy charges for the reasonable costs of support of a minor against the father, mother, spouse, or other person, while the minor is placed, or detained in, or committed to, any institution or other place, or pursuant to an order of the juvenile court. Existing law limits the costs of support to actual costs incurred by the county for food and food preparation, clothing, personal supplies, and medical expenses, not to exceed a maximum cost of $15 per day, except that the cost may be adjusted every 3rd year to reflect the percentage change in the calendar year annual average of the California Consumer Price Index, as specified. This bill would increase that amount to $30 per day. (6) Existing law authorizes the county board of supervisors or the court, as the case may be, to require reimbursement for the actual cost of services rendered for a petition to seal or expunge a criminal record of a minor, not to exceed $120. This bill would raise that limit to $150.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 606, Statutes of 2009.

  2. Approved by Governor.

  3. Enrolled. To Governor at 11 a.m.

  4. Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 21. Noes 16. Page 2370.) To enrollment.

  5. In Senate. To unfinished business.

  6. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 49. Noes 29. Page 3110.) To Senate.

  7. Read third time. Amended. (Page 3036.) To third reading.

  8. Read third time. Amended. (Page 2757.) To third reading.

  9. Read second time. To third reading.

  10. Read second time. Amended. To second reading.

  11. (Heard in committee on July 7.)

  12. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.)

  13. (Heard in committee on July 1.)

  14. From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on PUB. S. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  15. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  16. To Coms. on L. GOV. and PUB. S.

  17. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  18. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 22. Noes 15. Page 1108.) To Assembly.

  19. Read second time. Amended. To third reading.

  20. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 3. Noes 1. Page 809.)

  21. Set for hearing May 6.

  22. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  23. From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on RLS. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 588.) Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  24. Set for hearing April 21.

  25. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  26. To Com. on PUB. S.

  27. Read first time.

  28. From print. May be acted upon on or after March 30.

  29. Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Wolk · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Wolk

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Unfinished Business SB676 Wolk Concurrence

Passed 21 Yea · 17 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 1001
Unaffiliated 201602
Republican 0100
Total 211703
% of votes cast 51%41%0%7%
How each member voted (41)
Member Party Vote
Wyland — Nay
Yee — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Cogdill — Nay
Hancock — Yea
Harman — Nay
Hollingsworth — Nay
Huff — Nay
Negrete — Nay
Runner — Nay
Corbett — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Liu — Yea
Maldonado — Not Voting
Ducheny — Yea
McLeod — Nay
Oropeza — Not Voting
Ashburn — Nay
Benoit — Nay
Dutton — Nay
Price — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wiggins — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Aanestad — Nay
Alquist — Yea
Leno — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Romero — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wright — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Correa — Nay
Cox — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Nay
Florez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Not Voting
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

SB 676 Wolk Senate Third Reading By HALL

Passed 56 Yea · 33 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 523102
Democratic 3000
Republican 1200
Total 563302
% of votes cast 62%36%0%2%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
Hagman — Nay
Hall — Yea
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Coto — Yea
Evans — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Charles — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Davis — Yea
Huber — Yea
Tom — Nay
Krekorian — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Bass — Yea
Blakeslee — Nay
Lieu — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Fletcher — Nay
V. — Nay
Manuel — Nay
Perez — Nay
Audra — Nay
Bill — Not Voting
Fuller — Nay
Garrick — Nay
Gilmore — Nay
Harkey — Nay
Conway — Nay
Cook — Nay
Duvall — Nay
Jeffries — Nay
Knight — Nay
Logue — Nay
Miller — Nay
Nestande — Nay
Silva — Nay
Smyth — Nay
Tran — Nay
Adams — Nay
Ammiano — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Ma — Yea
Nava — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Torres — Yea
Villines — Nay
Emmerson — Nay
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
DeVore — Nay
Yamada — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 5 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 4002
Democratic 1000
Total 5002
% of votes cast 71%0%0%29%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Hagman — Not Voting
Gilmore — Not Voting
Hill — Yea
Ma — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Senate 3rd Reading SB676 Wolk

Passed 23 Yea · 15 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 211402
Democratic 2000
Republican 0100
Total 231502
% of votes cast 58%38%0%5%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Hollingsworth — Nay
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Cogdill — Nay
Corbett — Yea
Huff — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Liu — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Runner — Not Voting
Correa — Nay
Cox — Nay
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Ducheny — Not Voting
Dutton — Nay
Walters — Nay
Wiggins — Yea
Wright — Yea
Aanestad — Nay
Ashburn — Nay
Benoit — Nay
Harman — Nay
Leno — Yea
Maldonado — Nay
Pavley — Yea
Romero — Yea
Wolk — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Nay
Florez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 3 Yea · 1 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 3101
Total 3101
% of votes cast 60%20%0%20%
How each member voted (5)
Member Party Vote
Wiggins — Yea
Aanestad — Not Voting
Kehoe — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Cox — Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety taxation finance
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 676 do?
(1) Existing law, the Uniform Federal Lien Registration Act, governs the filing of notices of liens, certificates, and other notices affecting federal tax liens or other federal liens. The act requires a filing officer to issue, upon request, a certificate showing whether there is on file any notice of a federal lien or certificate or notice affecting any federal lien filed pursuant to the act or as specified. If the filing officer is a county recorder, the fee set by the filing officer may not exceed $15 for a certificate for each name searched. This bill would delete the limitation on the fee that may be charged by a county recorder acting as a filing officer for purposes of the act. (2) Existing law authorizes the county recorder of each county to charge a fee of $4 for the first page and $3 for each additional page for recording and indexing every instrument, paper, or notice required or permitted to be recorded, as specified. This bill would increase the maximum fee for the first page to $10, and would make other conforming changes. (3) Under existing law, every defendant, when represented by appointed counsel, is required to be assessed a registration fee not to exceed $25, but the fee is not required of any defendant that is financially unable to pay it. Under existing law, these provisions are operative in a county only upon the adoption of a resolution by the board of supervisors electing to establish the registration fee. This bill would increase the maximum amount for that registration fee to $50. (4) Existing law limits the fees that a court, county, or city, as applicable, may charge for various costs related to the judgment and execution of criminal matters, including certain administrative costs, costs related to collecting restitution or to probation supervision, certain costs of conducting a criminal investigation, and costs related to providing specified court services, such as a petition for changing a plea or for an order sealing a record. Existing law also limits the fee that a local agency may charge for taking fingerprints for licensing, employment, or certification to an amount not to exceed $10. This bill would increase the maximum fee for administrative costs of collection from 10% to 15%, and for other fees would delete those limits on the maximum fees that may be charged for providing those services pursuant to those provisions, as specified. This bill would also establish a fee to process installment payments, which would not exceed the administrative and clerical costs, and shall not exceed $75, as provided. Additionally, the bill would increase the maximum fee for changing a plea or setting aside a verdict from $120 to $150. (5) Existing law authorizes a county to levy charges for the reasonable costs of support of a minor against the father, mother, spouse, or other person, while the minor is placed, or detained in, or committed to, any institution or other place, or pursuant to an order of the juvenile court. Existing law limits the costs of support to actual costs incurred by the county for food and food preparation, clothing, personal supplies, and medical expenses, not to exceed a maximum cost of $15 per day, except that the cost may be adjusted every 3rd year to reflect the percentage change in the calendar year annual average of the California Consumer Price Index, as specified. This bill would increase that amount to $30 per day. (6) Existing law authorizes the county board of supervisors or the court, as the case may be, to require reimbursement for the actual cost of services rendered for a petition to seal or expunge a criminal record of a minor, not to exceed $120. This bill would raise that limit to $150.
Who sponsors SB 676?
SB 676 is sponsored by Wolk.
What is the current status of SB 676?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 676?
Track SB 676 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 676

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 676

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →