California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: To Executive

AB 338 — Transit village developments: infrastructure financing.

Last action — Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law authorizes a city or county to create a transit village plan for a transit village development district. A transit village plan is required to include all land within not less than 14 mile of the exterior boundary of the parcel on which is located a transit station, as defined. A legislative body is authorized to create an infrastructure financing district, adopt an infrastructure financing plan, and issue bonds, for which only the district is liable, to finance specified public facilities, upon voter approval. This bill would recast the area included in a transit village plan to include all land within not more than 12 mile of the main entrance of a transit station. The requirement of voter approval for the formation of an infrastructure financing district, adoption of an infrastructure financing plan, and an issuance of bonds for the purpose of implementing a transit facility, as defined, would be eliminated. A transit village plan financed by these bonds would be required to include specified demonstrable public benefits regarding housing, replacement dwelling units at an affordable housing cost when specified dwelling units are destroyed or removed, and a provision that at least 20% of all revenues derived from the property tax increment be dedicated to increase, improve, and preserve the transit village district's supply of affordable housing, as defined. The bill also would make technical, nonsubstantive changes. This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 65460.2 of the Government Code proposed by AB 1158, that would become operative only if AB 1158 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2010, and this bill is chaptered last.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.

  2. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.

  3. Vetoed by Governor.

  4. Enrolled and to the Governor at 5 p.m.

  5. Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 48. Noes 29. Page 3256.)

  6. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 10 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  7. Read third time, passed, and to Assembly. (Ayes 22. Noes 16. Page 2169.)

  8. Read second time. To third reading.

  9. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 3. Noes 2.) (July 8).

  10. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  11. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  12. Referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  13. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  14. Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 48. Noes 31. Page 1873.)

  15. Read third time, amended, and returned to third reading. (Page 1349.).

  16. Read second time. To third reading.

  17. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 5.) (April 22).

  18. From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (April 1).

  19. Referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  20. From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.

  21. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Ma · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Ma

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 57 Yea · 32 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 533003
Democratic 3000
Republican 1200
Total 573203
% of votes cast 62%35%0%3%
How each member voted (92)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Yea
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Coto — Yea
Charles — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Fong — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Beall — Yea
Davis — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Conway — Nay
Bill — Nay
Tom — Nay
Fuller — Nay
Fletcher — Nay
Audra — Nay
Garrick — Nay
Gilmore — Nay
Duvall — Not Voting
Hagman — Nay
Hayashi — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Huber — Nay
Huffman — Yea
Knight — Nay
Krekorian — Yea
Adams — Nay
Anderson — Nay
Blakeslee — Nay
Logue — Nay
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Nay
Monning — Yea
Nestande — Nay
Ruskin — Yea
Silva — Nay
Smyth — Nay
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Tran — Nay
Villines — Nay
Bass — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Not Voting
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Nay
Hill — Yea
Jeffries — Nay
Lieu — Yea
Ma — Yea
Nava — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Cook — Nay
Emmerson — Nay
Evans — Yea
DeVore — Nay
Yamada — Yea
Furutani — Not Voting
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 22 Yea · 16 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 201503
Democratic 2000
Republican 0100
Total 221603
% of votes cast 54%39%0%7%
How each member voted (41)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Wyland — Nay
Corbett — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Dutton — Nay
Hollingsworth — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Runner — Nay
Negrete — Not Voting
Leno — Yea
Benoit — Nay
McLeod — Not Voting
Pavley — Yea
Romero — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wiggins — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Aanestad — Nay
Alquist — Yea
Ashburn — Nay
Harman — Nay
Huff — Nay
Liu — Yea
Maldonado — Nay
Oropeza — Yea
Price — Yea
Wright — Yea
Cogdill — Nay
Correa — Nay
Cox — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Nay
Florez — Not Voting
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 3 Yea · 2 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 3200
Total 3200
% of votes cast 60%40%0%0%
How each member voted (5)
Member Party Vote
Cox — Nay
Wiggins — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Aanestad — Nay
Kehoe — Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 57 Yea · 34 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 533201
Republican 1200
Democratic 3000
Total 573401
% of votes cast 62%37%0%1%
How each member voted (92)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Cook — Nay
Davis — Yea
Duvall — Nay
Bill — Nay
Tom — Nay
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Galgiani — Nay
Fletcher — Nay
Audra — Nay
Bass — Yea
Blakeslee — Nay
Gilmore — Nay
Hagman — Nay
Harkey — Nay
Hayashi — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huber — Nay
Jeffries — Nay
Knight — Nay
Lieu — Yea
Logue — Nay
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Nay
Nava — Yea
Nestande — Nay
Price — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Silva — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Villines — Nay
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Charles — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Beall — Yea
Adams — Nay
Anderson — Nay
Block — Not Voting
Blumenfield — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Krekorian — Yea
Ma — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Smyth — Nay
Swanson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Tran — Nay
Conway — Nay
Emmerson — Nay
Coto — Yea
Evans — Yea
DeVore — Nay
Fuller — Nay
Garrick — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Nay
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 15 Yea · 6 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 14500
Democratic 1000
Republican 0101
Total 15601
% of votes cast 68%27%0%5%
How each member voted (22)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Yea
Charles — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Audra — Nay
Harkey — Nay
Ammiano — Yea
Duvall — Nay
Miller — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Skinner — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Price — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Davis — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Not Voting
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 338 do?
Existing law authorizes a city or county to create a transit village plan for a transit village development district. A transit village plan is required to include all land within not less than 14 mile of the exterior boundary of the parcel on which is located a transit station, as defined. A legislative body is authorized to create an infrastructure financing district, adopt an infrastructure financing plan, and issue bonds, for which only the district is liable, to finance specified public facilities, upon voter approval. This bill would recast the area included in a transit village plan to include all land within not more than 12 mile of the main entrance of a transit station. The requirement of voter approval for the formation of an infrastructure financing district, adoption of an infrastructure financing plan, and an issuance of bonds for the purpose of implementing a transit facility, as defined, would be eliminated. A transit village plan financed by these bonds would be required to include specified demonstrable public benefits regarding housing, replacement dwelling units at an affordable housing cost when specified dwelling units are destroyed or removed, and a provision that at least 20% of all revenues derived from the property tax increment be dedicated to increase, improve, and preserve the transit village district's supply of affordable housing, as defined. The bill also would make technical, nonsubstantive changes. This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 65460.2 of the Government Code proposed by AB 1158, that would become operative only if AB 1158 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2010, and this bill is chaptered last.
Who sponsors AB 338?
AB 338 is sponsored by Ma.
What is the current status of AB 338?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 338?
Track AB 338 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 338

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 338

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →