California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: Passed Assembly

AB 2307 — Education: academic performance.

Last action — From Senate committee without further action.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction, with approval of the state board, to develop an Academic Performance Index (API) . The API primarily measures student academic achievement and is used in determining a school's adequate yearly progress under the federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Existing law requires the Superintendent, with approval of the state board, to develop an alternative accountability system for specified schools. Existing law allows these schools to receive an API score, but prohibits them from being included in the API rankings of schools. This bill would provide that, as part of the Public School Performance Accountability Program, the Superintendent and the state board shall allow a dropout recovery high school, as defined, to report, in lieu of other indicators, the results of an individual pupil growth model that is proposed by the school and certified by the Superintendent pursuant to specified criteria.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. From Senate committee without further action.

  2. In committee: Held under submission.

  3. In committee: Placed on APPR suspense file.

  4. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  5. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  6. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (June 30).

  7. Referred to Com. on ED.

  8. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  9. Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 63. Noes 0. Page 5343.)

  10. Read second time. To Consent Calendar.

  11. From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (May 19).

  12. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  13. Read second time and amended.

  14. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 21).

  15. Re-referred to Com. on ED.

  16. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.

  17. Referred to Com. on ED.

  18. Read first time.

  19. From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.

  20. Introduced. To print.

Sponsors

  • Carter · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Carter

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 10 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 10001
Total 10001
% of votes cast 91%0%0%9%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Ashburn — Yea
Price — Yea
Walters — Not Voting
Wolk — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Leno — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Emmerson — Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 69 Yea · 0 Nay · 22 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 640021
Democratic 3000
Republican 2001
Total 690022
% of votes cast 76%0%0%24%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
Conway — Yea
Cook — Yea
Coto — Yea
Davis — Yea
Evans — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Charles — Yea
Gilmore — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Beall — Yea
DeVore — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Knight — Yea
Logue — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Norby — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torres — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Carter — Not Voting
Bill — Not Voting
Tom — Not Voting
De — Not Voting
La — Not Voting
Torre — Not Voting
De — Not Voting
Leon — Not Voting
Salas — Not Voting
Audra — Not Voting
Chesbro — Not Voting
Furutani — Not Voting
Hall — Not Voting
Silva — Not Voting
Smyth — Not Voting
Villines — Yea
Adams — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Bass — Not Voting
Blakeslee — Not Voting
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Bradford — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huber — Yea
Jeffries — Not Voting
Lieu — Yea
Ma — Yea
Nava — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Tran — Yea
Emmerson — Not Voting
Eng — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Passed 17 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 16002
Democratic 1000
Total 17002
% of votes cast 89%0%0%11%
How each member voted (19)
Member Party Vote
Fuentes — Yea
Hall — Yea
Charles — Yea
Bradford — Yea
De — Not Voting
Leon — Not Voting
Harkey — Yea
Hill — Yea
Miller — Yea
Norby — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Conway — Yea
Coto — Yea
Davis — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 2307 do?
Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction, with approval of the state board, to develop an Academic Performance Index (API) . The API primarily measures student academic achievement and is used in determining a school's adequate yearly progress under the federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Existing law requires the Superintendent, with approval of the state board, to develop an alternative accountability system for specified schools. Existing law allows these schools to receive an API score, but prohibits them from being included in the API rankings of schools. This bill would provide that, as part of the Public School Performance Accountability Program, the Superintendent and the state board shall allow a dropout recovery high school, as defined, to report, in lieu of other indicators, the results of an individual pupil growth model that is proposed by the school and certified by the Superintendent pursuant to specified criteria.
Who sponsors AB 2307?
AB 2307 is sponsored by Carter.
What is the current status of AB 2307?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 2307?
Track AB 2307 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 2307

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 2307

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →