South Coast Air Quality Management District: emission reduction credits: California Environmental Quality Act.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 388 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 388.
You're tracking SB 388
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 388 — South Coast Air Quality Management District: emission reduction credits: California Environmental Quality Act.
Last action — From committee without further action.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
(1) Under existing law, every air pollution control district or air quality management district in a federal nonattainment area for any national ambient air quality standard is required to establish by regulation, a system by which all reductions in emissions of air contaminants that are to be used to offset certain future increases in the emission of air contaminants are banked prior to use. The South Coast Air Quality Management District promulgated various rules establishing offset exemptions, providing Priority Reserve offset credits, and creating or tracking credits used for offset exemption or Priority Reserve projects. In Natural Resources Defense Council v. South Coast Air Quality Management District (Super. Ct. Los Angeles County, 2007, No. BS 110792) , the superior court found the promulgation of certain of these district rules to be in violation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) . This bill would require the executive officer of the South Coast Air Quality Management District, upon making a specified finding, to transfer emission reduction credits for certain pollutants from the south coast district's internal emission credit accounts to eligible electrical generating facilities, as described. The bill would exempt those actions from CEQA. By imposing these duties on the South Coast Air Quality Management District, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. These provisions would be repealed on January 1, 2013. (2) This bill would state the findings and declarations of the Legislature concerning the need for special legislation. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Amended 09/12/09 - Amended Assembly Current pdf September 12, 2009
- Amended 09/04/09 - Amended Assembly pdf September 04, 2009
- Amended 07/14/09 - Amended Assembly pdf July 14, 2009
- Amended 06/29/09 - Amended Assembly pdf June 29, 2009
- Amended 04/27/09 - Amended Senate pdf April 27, 2009
- Amended 04/22/09 - Amended Senate pdf April 22, 2009
- Amended 04/16/09 - Amended Senate pdf April 16, 2009
- Amended 04/01/09 - Amended Senate pdf April 01, 2009
- Introduced 02/26/09 - Introduced pdf February 26, 2009
- SB388 View text html
Action History
-
From committee without further action.
-
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
In Senate.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 44. Noes 16. Page 3409.) To Senate.
-
Amended.
-
Read second time.
-
(Heard in committee on September 11.)
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 9. Noes 2.)
-
Joint Rule 62(a) file notice suspended. (Page 3381.)
-
Re-referred to Com. On U. & C. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
-
Read third time. Amended. (Ayes 43. Noes 28. Page 3042.)
-
From inactive file to third reading file.
-
Notice of motion to remove from inactive file given by Assembly Member Torrico.
-
Placed on inactive file on request of Assembly Member Torrico.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
Placed on second reading file.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
(Heard in committee on July 7.)
-
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.)
-
(Corrected July 6.)
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.
-
To Com. on HIGHER ED.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 31. Noes 5. Page 895.) To Assembly.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
Placed on second reading file.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 807.) Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED.
-
Set for hearing May 6.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED.
-
Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Set for hearing April 22.
-
Re-referred to Coms. on ED. and JUD.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
To Com. on RLS.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 28.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Calderon · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 5 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Calderon
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 46 | 16 | 0 | 23 |
| Democratic | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 49 | 17 | 0 | 25 |
| % of votes cast | 54% | 19% | 0% | 27% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Not Voting |
| Chesbro | — | Nay |
| Evans | — | Not Voting |
| Yamada | — | Not Voting |
| Bonnie | — | Nay |
| Lowenthal | — | Nay |
| Feuer | — | Nay |
| Furutani | — | Not Voting |
| De | — | Not Voting |
| La | — | Not Voting |
| Torre | — | Not Voting |
| Fong | — | Not Voting |
| V. | — | Not Voting |
| Manuel | — | Not Voting |
| Perez | — | Not Voting |
| John | — | Not Voting |
| A. | — | Not Voting |
| Perez | — | Not Voting |
| Salas | — | Not Voting |
| Saldana | — | Not Voting |
| Hayashi | — | Nay |
| Hill | — | Nay |
| Huffman | — | Nay |
| Krekorian | — | Not Voting |
| Monning | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Nay |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Nay |
| Block | — | Not Voting |
| Skinner | — | Nay |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Not Voting |
| Torrico | — | Not Voting |
| Villines | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Nay |
| Bradford | — | Not Voting |
| Brownley | — | Nay |
| Buchanan | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Nay |
| Nava | — | Not Voting |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Nay |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Not Voting |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Total | 10 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 63% | 13% | 0% | 25% |
How each member voted (16)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Not Voting |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Not Voting |
| Huffman | — | Nay |
| Krekorian | — | Not Voting |
| Skinner | — | Nay |
| Torrico | — | Not Voting |
| Villines | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 46 | 28 | 0 | 11 |
| Republican | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 50 | 30 | 0 | 11 |
| % of votes cast | 55% | 33% | 0% | 12% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Bill | — | Nay |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Galgiani | — | Not Voting |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Tom | — | Not Voting |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| De | — | Not Voting |
| La | — | Not Voting |
| Torre | — | Not Voting |
| Duvall | — | Nay |
| Gilmore | — | Nay |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Not Voting |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Nay |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Nay |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Krekorian | — | Not Voting |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Nay |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Not Voting |
| Davis | — | Not Voting |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Furutani | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Nay |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 11% | 0% | 22% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Not Voting |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 28 | 5 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 32 | 5 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 13% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Not Voting |
| Dutton | — | Not Voting |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Not Voting |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Nay |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 388 do?
- (1) Under existing law, every air pollution control district or air quality management district in a federal nonattainment area for any national ambient air quality standard is required to establish by regulation, a system by which all reductions in emissions of air contaminants that are to be used to offset certain future increases in the emission of air contaminants are banked prior to use. The South Coast Air Quality Management District promulgated various rules establishing offset exemptions, providing Priority Reserve offset credits, and creating or tracking credits used for offset exemption or Priority Reserve projects. In Natural Resources Defense Council v. South Coast Air Quality Management District (Super. Ct. Los Angeles County, 2007, No. BS 110792) , the superior court found the promulgation of certain of these district rules to be in violation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) . This bill would require the executive officer of the South Coast Air Quality Management District, upon making a specified finding, to transfer emission reduction credits for certain pollutants from the south coast district's internal emission credit accounts to eligible electrical generating facilities, as described. The bill would exempt those actions from CEQA. By imposing these duties on the South Coast Air Quality Management District, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. These provisions would be repealed on January 1, 2013. (2) This bill would state the findings and declarations of the Legislature concerning the need for special legislation. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors SB 388?
- SB 388 is sponsored by Calderon.
- What is the current status of SB 388?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 388?
- Track SB 388 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 388
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 388
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →