Employment: payment of wages.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 2187 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 2187.
You're tracking AB 2187
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 2187 — Employment: payment of wages.
Last action — Vetoed by Governor.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law makes it a misdemeanor for a person or employer who, having the ability to pay, willfully refuses to pay wages due to a current employee, an employee who has resigned, or an employee who has been discharged. Under existing law, an aggrieved employee has the right to restitution for unpaid wages. Existing law also imposes civil penalties against a person or employer who wrongfully fails to pay wages. This bill would create a separate prohibition against a person or an employer who, having the ability to pay, willfully fails to pay all wages due to an employee who has been discharged or who has quit within 90 days of the date of the wages becoming due, unless exempted, and would impose additional criminal penalties for that conduct. The bill would also require a person or employer who violates these provisions to pay restitution in an amount equal to the amount of unpaid wages to the aggrieved employee upon conviction. Because this bill would create a new crime, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Enrolled 08/31/10 - Enrolled Current pdf August 31, 2010
- Amended 08/11/10 - Amended Senate pdf August 11, 2010
- Amended 03/24/10 - Amended Assembly pdf March 24, 2010
- Introduced 02/18/10 - Introduced pdf February 18, 2010
- AB2187 View text html
Action History
-
Vetoed by Governor.
-
Enrolled and to the Governor at 3 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 47. Noes 27. Page 6686.)
-
Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Ayes 49. Noes 27. Page 6645.)
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 26 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Assembly. (Ayes 21. Noes 14. Page 4849.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
Read third time, amended. To second reading.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (June 23).
-
Referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 42. Noes 28. Page 5048.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (April 21).
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (April 7).
-
Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. & E. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on L. & E.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Joaquin Arambula · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Arambula, Joaquin Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 52 | 28 | 0 | 4 |
| Republican | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 56 | 30 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 62% | 33% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (90)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Nay |
| Tom | — | Nay |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Gilmore | — | Nay |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Nay |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Not Voting |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Not Voting |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Not Voting |
| Villines | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Fuentes | — | Not Voting |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Nay |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 20 | 13 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 22 | 14 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 55% | 35% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Nay |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Ducheny | — | Not Voting |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Nay |
| Hollingsworth | — | Nay |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Not Voting |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 17% | 0% | 17% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Nay |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 43 | 29 | 0 | 13 |
| Republican | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 47 | 31 | 0 | 13 |
| % of votes cast | 52% | 34% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Audra | — | Nay |
| De | — | Not Voting |
| La | — | Not Voting |
| Torre | — | Not Voting |
| V. | — | Not Voting |
| Manuel | — | Not Voting |
| Perez | — | Not Voting |
| Galgiani | — | Not Voting |
| Gilmore | — | Not Voting |
| Mendoza | — | Not Voting |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Block | — | Not Voting |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Villines | — | Nay |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Nay |
| Tom | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Nay |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Bass | — | Not Voting |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Not Voting |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Not Voting |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Nay |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Nay |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 72% | 28% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (18)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 43% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bill | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2187 do?
- Existing law makes it a misdemeanor for a person or employer who, having the ability to pay, willfully refuses to pay wages due to a current employee, an employee who has resigned, or an employee who has been discharged. Under existing law, an aggrieved employee has the right to restitution for unpaid wages. Existing law also imposes civil penalties against a person or employer who wrongfully fails to pay wages. This bill would create a separate prohibition against a person or an employer who, having the ability to pay, willfully fails to pay all wages due to an employee who has been discharged or who has quit within 90 days of the date of the wages becoming due, unless exempted, and would impose additional criminal penalties for that conduct. The bill would also require a person or employer who violates these provisions to pay restitution in an amount equal to the amount of unpaid wages to the aggrieved employee upon conviction. Because this bill would create a new crime, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 2187?
- AB 2187 is sponsored by Arambula, Joaquin (Democratic).
- What is the current status of AB 2187?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 2187?
- Track AB 2187 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2187
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2187
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →