SB 732 — Medi-Cal: skilled nursing facilities: quality assurance fees.
Last action — From Assembly without further action.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation by the State Department of Public Health of long-term health care facilities, including skilled nursing facilities. Existing law requires the department to impose a uniform quality assurance fee on each skilled nursing facility, with certain exceptions, in accordance with a prescribed formula. The formula is based on the determination of the projected net revenues of skilled nursing facilities. The fee will cease to be assessed and collected on and after July 31, 2011. Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which health care services, including nursing facility services, are provided to qualified low-income persons. Existing law authorizes the director to adopt regulations as are necessary to implement the above-described quality assurance fee. Existing law authorizes the director, as an alternative to adopting regulations, to implement the above-described provisions, in whole or in part, by means of a provider bulletin, or other similar instructions, without taking regulatory action, provided that neither the bulletin nor the other similar instructions remain in effect after July 31, 2010. This bill would permit provider bulletins or similar instructions related to exemptions from the quality assurance fee for providers of a continuum of services, including independent living services, assisted living services, and skilled nursing care on a single campus that have not received a Letter of Exemption from the State Department of Social Services, as specified, issued prior to July 31, 2010, to remain in effect after July 31, 2010. It would also authorize the director to issue new provider bulletins or similar instructions, after July 31, 2010, related to exemptions from the quality assurance fee for providers of a continuum of services, including independent living services, assisted living services, and skilled nursing care on a single campus that have not received a Letter of Exemption from the State Department of Social Services, as specified. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill Text
- Amended 03/08/10 - Amended Assembly Current pdf March 08, 2010
- Amended 01/20/10 - Amended Senate pdf January 20, 2010
- Amended 01/05/10 - Amended Senate pdf January 05, 2010
- Amended 12/17/09 - Amended Senate pdf December 17, 2009
- Amended 03/31/09 - Amended Senate pdf March 31, 2009
- Introduced 02/27/09 - Introduced pdf February 27, 2009
- SB732 View text html
Action History
-
From Assembly without further action.
-
From committee without further action.
-
Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
To Com. on HEALTH.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 2705.) To Assembly.
-
Read second time. Amended. To third reading.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and be amended.
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 2672.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing January 13.
-
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set, first hearing. Held in committee and under submission.
-
(Suspense - for vote only.)
-
Set for hearing May 28.
-
Placed on APPR suspense file.
-
Set for hearing May 4.
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 637.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing April 22.
-
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
To Com. on RLS.
-
Read first time.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 30.
-
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Alquist · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Alquist
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 34 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 37 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 93% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Not Voting |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Not Voting |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 0% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Not Voting |
| Alquist | — | Not Voting |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 85% | 0% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Not Voting |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (12)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 732 do?
- Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation by the State Department of Public Health of long-term health care facilities, including skilled nursing facilities. Existing law requires the department to impose a uniform quality assurance fee on each skilled nursing facility, with certain exceptions, in accordance with a prescribed formula. The formula is based on the determination of the projected net revenues of skilled nursing facilities. The fee will cease to be assessed and collected on and after July 31, 2011. Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which health care services, including nursing facility services, are provided to qualified low-income persons. Existing law authorizes the director to adopt regulations as are necessary to implement the above-described quality assurance fee. Existing law authorizes the director, as an alternative to adopting regulations, to implement the above-described provisions, in whole or in part, by means of a provider bulletin, or other similar instructions, without taking regulatory action, provided that neither the bulletin nor the other similar instructions remain in effect after July 31, 2010. This bill would permit provider bulletins or similar instructions related to exemptions from the quality assurance fee for providers of a continuum of services, including independent living services, assisted living services, and skilled nursing care on a single campus that have not received a Letter of Exemption from the State Department of Social Services, as specified, issued prior to July 31, 2010, to remain in effect after July 31, 2010. It would also authorize the director to issue new provider bulletins or similar instructions, after July 31, 2010, related to exemptions from the quality assurance fee for providers of a continuum of services, including independent living services, assisted living services, and skilled nursing care on a single campus that have not received a Letter of Exemption from the State Department of Social Services, as specified. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
- Who sponsors SB 732?
- SB 732 is sponsored by Alquist.
- What is the current status of SB 732?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 732?
- Track SB 732 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 732
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 732
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →