Medi-Cal: foster children: eligibility.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 771 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 771.
You're tracking SB 771
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 771 — Medi-Cal: foster children: eligibility.
Last action — From Assembly without further action.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law establishes the federal Medicaid Program, administered by each state, California's version of which is the Medi-Cal program. The Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, provides health care services to qualified low-income recipients. This bill would, to the extent federal financial participation is available, extend Medi-Cal eligibility, including eligibility for the Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment (EPSDT) Program, to children who were formerly in foster care and are under 26 years of age, pursuant to prescribed provisions of federal law. Because each county is responsible for making Medi-Cal eligibility determinations, by expanding Medi-Cal eligibility the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill Text
- Amended 08/02/10 - Amended Assembly Current pdf August 02, 2010
- Amended 06/22/10 - Amended Assembly pdf June 22, 2010
- Amended 01/26/10 - Amended Senate pdf January 26, 2010
- Amended 12/16/09 - Amended Senate pdf December 16, 2009
- Amended 04/02/09 - Amended Senate pdf April 02, 2009
- Introduced 02/27/09 - Introduced pdf February 27, 2009
- SB771 View text html
Action History
-
From Assembly without further action.
-
From committee without further action.
-
Set, second hearing. Held in committee and under submission.
-
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Joint Rule 62(a) file notice suspended. (Page 5989.)
-
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
(Heard in committee on June 29.)
-
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 15. Noes 4.)
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
To Com. on HEALTH.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 24. Noes 10. Page 2733.) To Assembly.
-
Read second time. Amended. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 3. Page 2694.)
-
(Suspense - for vote only.)
-
Set for hearing January 21.
-
Set for hearing January 19.
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1. Page 2673.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing January 13.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
To Com. on RLS.
-
Read first time.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 30.
-
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Alquist · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Alquist
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 20 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 22 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 85% | 15% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (26)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 23 | 9 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 25 | 10 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 63% | 25% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Nay |
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Harman | — | Nay |
| Hollingsworth | — | Nay |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Maldonado | — | Not Voting |
| Alquist | — | Not Voting |
| Ashburn | — | Nay |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Huff | — | Not Voting |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 6 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 55% | 27% | 0% | 18% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Not Voting |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Nay |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 0% | 0% | 27% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| Alquist | — | Not Voting |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Not Voting |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 70% | 10% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Not Voting |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Not Voting |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 771 do?
- Existing law establishes the federal Medicaid Program, administered by each state, California's version of which is the Medi-Cal program. The Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, provides health care services to qualified low-income recipients. This bill would, to the extent federal financial participation is available, extend Medi-Cal eligibility, including eligibility for the Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment (EPSDT) Program, to children who were formerly in foster care and are under 26 years of age, pursuant to prescribed provisions of federal law. Because each county is responsible for making Medi-Cal eligibility determinations, by expanding Medi-Cal eligibility the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
- Who sponsors SB 771?
- SB 771 is sponsored by Alquist.
- What is the current status of SB 771?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 771?
- Track SB 771 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 771
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 771
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →